NEWSLETTER | PHOTOS | RECIPES | CONVENTION CARD | COMMENT | MASTERPOINT RACE
Click --> HAND PRINTOUT to view all hands or RECAP for recap format.
To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
|
|
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session August 3, 2011 Scores after 5 rounds Average: 25.0 Section E Pair Pct Score Rank MPs 4 69.00 34.50 1 0.60 Jim Ciolli - Hiroko Kitamura 2 51.00 25.50 2 0.42 Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter 1 49.00 24.50 Cheryl Rankin - Carol Adair 3 48.00 24.00 Judith Mckay - Jack Purdum 6 46.00 23.00 Trish Lane - Kathie Angione 5 37.00 18.50 Gary Piazzoni - Liz Piazzoni |
W 6♥; W 5N; E 5♥; E 3N; W 4♦; E 3♦; N 1♠; W 1♣ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♠ 2 450 2.00 0.00 4-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ W ♦ 4 480 1.00 1.00 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
6 ♥ W ♣ A 980 0.00 2.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 1-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♥; NS 2N; NS 3♣; S 1♠; EW 1♦ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ S ♠ K 650 2.00 0.00 4-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ S ♠ K 620 1.00 1.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 1-Rankin-Adair
2 ♥ S ♠ K 170 0.00 2.00 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3N; NS 4♣; NS 2♠; EW 1♥; NS 1♦ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♥ 5 430 2.00 0.00 4-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
1 NT N ♥ 5 150 1.00 1.00 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
2 ♠ N ♣ 9 100 0.00 2.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 1-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♥; EW 4♣; EW 1N; N 1♠; NS 1♦ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠ N ♦ A 200 2.00 0.00 4-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ E ♠ Q 140 0.50 1.50 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
2 ♥ E ♦ 5 140 0.50 1.50 6-Lane-Angione vs 1-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 4♣; NS 2♥; EW 1♦ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♠ 3 660 2.00 0.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 1-Rankin-Adair
4 ♠ S ♦ 7 100 1.00 1.00 4-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
6 NT S ♦ 10 300 0.00 2.00 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 5N; EW 5♠; EW 4♦; EW 2♥; N 1♣ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT E ♣ 6 200 2.00 0.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 NT E ♥ 10 100 1.00 1.00 4-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
3 ♦ E ♣ A 130 0.00 2.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♥; EW 1N; NS 2♦; NS 1♠; NS 1♣ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT S ♣ J 120 2.00 0.00 4-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
2 ♦ N ♣ 6 110 1.00 1.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♠ N ♣ 6 100 0.00 2.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♦; EW 5♣; EW 2N; NS 1♠; NS 1♥ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ N ♣ A 110 2.00 0.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♠ N ♣ K 50 1.00 1.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ S ♦ 5 100 0.00 2.00 4-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
| ||||||||||||||||||
S 3N; NS 3♠; NS 4♣; N 2N; NS 2♥; NS 1♦ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♥ 3 430 2.00 0.00 4-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
3 NT N ♥ J 400 1.00 1.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 NT S ♦ 6 100 0.00 2.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 2N; EW 2♠; W 2♥; EW 2♦; EW 2♣; E 1♥ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT W ♥ 2 100 2.00 0.00 4-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
2 ♦ W ♠ Q 110 1.00 1.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
2 ♥ S ♠ 10 300 0.00 2.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 5♠; S 3N; NS 5♣; EW 2♥; NS 2♦ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ N ♥ 10 450 1.50 0.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Rankin-Adair
4 ♠ N ♣ 9 450 1.50 0.50 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
3 NT S ♦ 10 100 0.00 2.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 6♥; EW 6♦; EW 3N; EW 2♠; EW 3♣ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ E ♠ J 170 2.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Rankin-Adair
3 ♥ E ♠ K 200 1.00 1.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
4 ♥ W ♠ K 450 0.00 2.00 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♥; NS 2N; NS 3♣; NS 2♦; NS 1♠ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S ♥ 3 600 2.00 0.00 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
1 NT N ♦ 6 90 1.00 1.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
2 NT N ♠ 9 100 0.00 2.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 2♠; NS 1N; NS 2♦; NS 2♣; NS 1♥ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT S ♥ 9 150 2.00 0.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
2 ♦ N ♥ A 110 0.50 1.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Rankin-Adair
2 ♦ S ♠ 6 110 0.50 1.50 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 6N; EW 6♠; EW 4♥; EW 5♦; EW 3♣ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 ♠ W ♦ 8 100 2.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Rankin-Adair
3 NT W ♣ 5 400 1.00 1.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 3-Mckay-Purdum
6 ♠ W ♥ A 980 0.00 2.00 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♥; NS 2♠; EW 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♣ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W 100 2.00 0.00 3-Mckay-Purdum vs 1-Rankin-Adair
4 ♠ N ♣ A 100 1.00 1.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
2 ♥ W ♦ 9 170 0.00 2.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
| ||||||||||||||||||
S 4N; NS 5♦; NS 3♥; N 2N; NS 3♣; NS 1♠ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S ♥ 6 430 2.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 NT N ♠ 3 50 1.00 1.00 3-Mckay-Purdum vs 1-Rankin-Adair
3 NT N ♠ 6 100 0.00 2.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 4♥; EW 4♣; NS 1♦ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ E ♦ 8 420 2.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
4 ♥ E ♦ K 450 0.50 1.50 3-Mckay-Purdum vs 1-Rankin-Adair
4 ♥ E ♦ K 450 0.50 1.50 6-Lane-Angione vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♠; S 4♥; NS 3N; NS 5♣; N 3♥; NS 2♦ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♣ 2 400 2.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
2 NT N ♣ 2 150 1.00 1.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
3 NT N ♦ 9 50 0.00 2.00 3-Mckay-Purdum vs 1-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♥; NS 2♠; EW 3♦; NS 2♣ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ S ♣ 10 110 1.50 0.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
2 ♠ N ♣ 10 110 1.50 0.50 6-Lane-Angione vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
3 ♠ S ♦ A 100 0.00 2.00 3-Mckay-Purdum vs 1-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 2♠; EW 2♥; NS 1♣ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♦ K 100 2.00 0.00 3-Mckay-Purdum vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♠ W ♥ 6 110 0.50 1.50 1-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
2 ♠ W ♣ 2 110 0.50 1.50 6-Lane-Angione vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 2♠; EW 2♥; NS 1N; EW 2♣; EW 1♦ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT S ♠ 9 50 2.00 0.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
2 ♠ W ♦ 5 140 1.00 1.00 3-Mckay-Purdum vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT S 150 0.00 2.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||
S 3N; N 2N; NS 2♠; NS 2♦; NS 1♥; NS 1♣ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♦ 2 600 2.00 0.00 3-Mckay-Purdum vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 NT N ♦ 2 150 1.00 1.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 NT N ♥ 10 100 0.00 2.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 4♣; NS 2♥; EW 3♦ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♥ 4 150 2.00 0.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
4 ♠ E ♥ A 50 1.00 1.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
4 ♠ E ♥ A 420 0.00 2.00 3-Mckay-Purdum vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 3♥; EW 1N; NS 2♣; NS 1♦ |
CONTRACT LEAD SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT S ♠ A 50 2.00 0.00 6-Lane-Angione vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♠ W ♣ A 140 1.00 1.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Ciolli-Kitamura
1 ♠ W ♦ 7 170 0.00 2.00 3-Mckay-Purdum vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008