To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session December 5, 2012
Scores after 5 rounds Average: 50.0 Section E North-South
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
1 55.00 55.00 A 1 1.25(A) James Andrews - Shay Andrews
3 51.50 51.50 C 2 1 1 0.98(B) Cheryl Rankin - Carol Adair
4 48.50 48.50 C 2/3 2/3 0.59(B) Tom Turner - Roy Shepard
5 48.50 48.50 C 2/3 2/3 0.59(B) Don Sandweiss - Liz Cogdill
2 46.50 46.50 C Bruce Zissen - Jim Ciolli
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session December 5, 2012
Scores after 5 rounds Average: 50.0 Section E East-West
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
1 60.50 60.50 A 1 1.25(A) Kathie Angione - John Lagodimos
2 54.50 54.50 C 2 1 1 0.98(B) Judy Shepard - Martha Walker
4 48.50 48.50 C 2 2 0.69(B) Judi Bunch - Hiroko Kitamura
5 47.00 47.00 C Gary Piazzoni - Liz Piazzoni
3 39.50 39.50 C Fran Hunter - Doral Hunter
Board 1 North Deals None Vul
♠
2
♥
A Q J 10 5 4
♦
A Q 4
♣
10 8 2
♠
A Q 9 4
♥
8 7 6 3
♦
6
♣
Q 9 4 3
N
W
E
S
♠
J 10 8 7 6
♥
—
♦
K 8 5 2
♣
K J 7 6
13 8 8 11
♠
K 5 3
♥
K 9 2
♦
J 10 9 7 3
♣
A 5
EW 4♠; NS 4♥; NS 2N; EW 3♣; NS 2♦; Par −100: NS 5♥×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♠ J 5 450 4.00 0.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
4 ♥ N ♠ J 4 420 2.50 1.50 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ N ♠ J 4 420 2.50 1.50 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♠ E ♥ K −1 50 1.00 3.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 2-Shepard-Walker
5 ♥ N ♠ J −2 100 0.00 4.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
3
♥
A K Q 10 6 2
♦
A J 2
♣
A 10 2
♠
A K 6 4
♥
9 5 4
♦
K 5 3
♣
K J 4
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 10 9 7 5
♥
8 7
♦
Q 9 8 4
♣
9 6
18 14 4 4
♠
J 8 2
♥
J 3
♦
10 7 6
♣
Q 8 7 5 3
NS 3♥; NS 4♣; NS 2N; EW 2♠; Par +130
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♣ 9 4 620 3.50 0.50 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
4 ♥ N ♣ 9 4 620 3.50 0.50 3-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♠ E ♥ J −3 150 2.00 2.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 2-Shepard-Walker
3 ♠× E ♥ J −1 100 1.00 3.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♥ N ♣ 9 −1 100 0.00 4.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
Q 3
♥
J 9 8 6
♦
8 7 6 5 3
♣
5 2
♠
J 6 2
♥
K Q 3
♦
A 10 9
♣
K J 9 4
N
W
E
S
♠
K 10 8
♥
7
♦
K Q 2
♣
A Q 10 7 6 3
3 14 14 9
♠
A 9 7 5 4
♥
A 10 5 4 2
♦
J 4
♣
8
EW 5N; EW 5♣; EW 2♠; EW 3♦; NS 1♥; Par −660
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 ♣ W ♣ 5 −1 100 4.00 0.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
2 ♣ E ♦ 5 5 150 3.00 1.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
5 ♣ W ♦ 8 5 600 1.50 2.50 3-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
5 ♣ W ♥ 6 5 600 1.50 2.50 4-Turner-Shepard vs 2-Shepard-Walker
3 NT E ♦ J 5 660 0.00 4.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul
♠
A 10 8 7
♥
A
♦
K 9 6 5 4
♣
J 8 6
♠
J 9 5 4 3
♥
Q 8 4 2
♦
A 10 8 3
♣
—
N
W
E
S
♠
6
♥
K J 9 7 5 3
♦
Q 7 2
♣
A 10 4
12 7 10 11
♠
K Q 2
♥
10 6
♦
J
♣
K Q 9 7 5 3 2
EW 3♥; NS 4♣; NS 1♠; NS 1♦; Par +130
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♥× E ♦ J −3 800 4.00 0.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
4 ♥× E ♦ J −1 200 3.00 1.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♣ S ♥ 2 4 130 2.00 2.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 2-Shepard-Walker
3 ♥ E ♦ J 3 140 1.00 3.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
3 NT N ♥ 7 −3 300 0.00 4.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
A 7 6 3 2
♥
K 4 3 2
♦
7 4 2
♣
4
♠
J 9 5
♥
A 10 7
♦
A 10 3
♣
J 10 3 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K
♥
J 9 8 5
♦
K Q J 5
♣
Q 7 6 5
7 10 12 11
♠
Q 10 8 4
♥
Q 6
♦
9 8 6
♣
A K 9 8
NS 2♠; EW 2♣; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; Par +100: EW 3♣×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 ♠ N ♦ K 2 110 4.00 0.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
1 NT W ♠ 3 −1 50 3.00 1.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 2-Shepard-Walker
1 NT W ♠ 2 1 90 2.00 2.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
2 ♥ W ♥ 5 2 110 1.00 3.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
3 ♠ N ♦ K −2 200 0.00 4.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
A K J 8
♥
J 10 6
♦
A J 5 3
♣
6 3
♠
7
♥
5 4
♦
8 6 4
♣
A K Q 10 9 5 2
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 10 9 6 3
♥
A 8 2
♦
10 2
♣
J 8 7
14 9 7 10
♠
5 4 2
♥
K Q 9 7 3
♦
K Q 9 7
♣
4
NS 4♥; NS 3♠; NS 4♦; EW 3♣; EW 1N; Par +420
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ S ♣ A 4 170 3.00 1.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 2-Shepard-Walker
3 ♥ S ♣ A 4 170 3.00 1.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♥ S 4 170 3.00 1.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♣ W ♠ A −1 100 1.00 3.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
4 ♥ S ♠ 7 −1 50 0.00 4.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul
♠
J 8 7
♥
K
♦
Q J 9 8 5
♣
9 8 5 4
♠
—
♥
A Q J 5 3 2
♦
A 7 4 3
♣
K J 6
N
W
E
S
♠
A K 10 9 6 4 3
♥
—
♦
K 10 6 2
♣
10 7
7 15 10 8
♠
Q 5 2
♥
10 9 8 7 6 4
♦
—
♣
A Q 3 2
E 5♠; EW 4N; W 4♠; EW 4♦; EW 2♥; EW 1♣; Par −650
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♣ 9 −1 100 3.50 0.50 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
4 ♥ W ♦ Q −1 100 3.50 0.50 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT W ♦ 9 4 630 1.50 2.50 3-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
3 NT W ♦ Q 4 630 1.50 2.50 4-Turner-Shepard vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
4 ♠ E ♥ 10 5 650 0.00 4.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 2-Shepard-Walker
Board 8 West Deals None Vul
♠
Q 6 2
♥
8
♦
A Q 10 2
♣
K J 8 6 2
♠
9 7 5
♥
A K 5 4 2
♦
J 9 7 5
♣
5
N
W
E
S
♠
A K J 3
♥
J 10 6 3
♦
K 6
♣
Q 10 9
12 8 14 6
♠
10 8 4
♥
Q 9 7
♦
8 4 3
♣
A 7 4 3
EW 5♥; EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 2♦; NS 1♣; Par −450
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ E ♣ A −1 50 4.00 0.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♣ N ♥ 3 −2 100 3.00 1.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
2 ♥ W ♠ 2 3 140 2.00 2.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 2-Shepard-Walker
1 ♥ W ♠ 2 5 200 1.00 3.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ W ♠ 2 6 230 0.00 4.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
A J 7 2
♥
Q 8 5
♦
K 7
♣
Q 10 5 2
♠
9 4
♥
K 9 4 3
♦
9 6 4 3
♣
A K 3
N
W
E
S
♠
K 3
♥
7 6 2
♦
Q J 10 8 5
♣
J 9 8
12 10 7 11
♠
Q 10 8 6 5
♥
A J 10
♦
A 2
♣
7 6 4
NS 3♠; S 3♣; NS 1N; N 2♣; EW 1♦; Par +140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ S ♣ A 3 140 3.50 0.50 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♠ S ♣ A 3 140 3.50 0.50 4-Turner-Shepard vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
3 ♠ S ♣ A −1 50 1.00 3.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 2-Shepard-Walker
4 ♠ S ♣ K −1 50 1.00 3.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♠ S ♣ A −1 50 1.00 3.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul
♠
8 6 3
♥
A 8 7
♦
Q 3
♣
K 10 8 5 2
♠
A K 10 2
♥
K J 10 9 6 5
♦
J 2
♣
4
N
W
E
S
♠
Q J 9 5 4
♥
Q 2
♦
10 9 6
♣
Q 9 6
9 12 7 12
♠
7
♥
4 3
♦
A K 8 7 5 4
♣
A J 7 3
NS 6♦; NS 6♣; EW 3♠; NS 2N; EW 2♥; Par +800: EW 6♠×−3
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ S ♠ K 6 170 3.50 0.50 3-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♦ S ♠ A 6 170 3.50 0.50 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♥ W ♦ Q 3 140 1.00 3.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♥ W ♦ Q 3 140 1.00 3.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 2-Shepard-Walker
3 ♥ W ♦ Q 3 140 1.00 3.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 11 South Deals None Vul
♠
—
♥
A J
♦
6 5 4 3
♣
Q J 10 8 7 6 4
♠
9 8 4 3
♥
K 8 7 6 3 2
♦
A K
♣
5
N
W
E
S
♠
K Q 7 5
♥
Q
♦
Q J 10 7
♣
A K 9 2
8 10 17 5
♠
A J 10 6 2
♥
10 9 5 4
♦
9 8 2
♣
3
EW 3♠; W 3♥; EW 2N; E 2♥; EW 2♦; EW 1♣; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♣ Q −1 50 3.50 0.50 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
3 NT E ♣ 3 −1 50 3.50 0.50 3-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ W ♣ Q 3 140 2.00 2.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♥ W ♦ 6 5 200 1.00 3.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
3 NT E ♣ 3 3 400 0.00 4.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 2-Shepard-Walker
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul
♠
10 7 6 4
♥
A Q 6 4
♦
J 5
♣
Q 9 4
♠
8
♥
K 10 9 8 7 5 3
♦
6 4
♣
10 5 3
N
W
E
S
♠
K Q J 9 5 2
♥
2
♦
Q 9 8 2
♣
6 2
9 3 8 20
♠
A 3
♥
J
♦
A K 10 7 3
♣
A K J 8 7
NS 7♣; NS 6N; NS 6♦; NS 2♠; NS 2♥; Par +2000: EW 7♥×−8; EW 7♠×−8
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S ♠ 8 5 660 4.00 0.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
3 NT N ♠ K 4 630 3.00 1.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♣ S ♠ 8 6 170 1.50 2.50 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♣ S ♠ 8 6 170 1.50 2.50 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 2-Shepard-Walker
6 ♣× N ♥ 2 −1 200 0.00 4.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul
♠
8 4 3 2
♥
K 6 4
♦
A K J 2
♣
J 4
♠
A 6
♥
5 3
♦
10 8 4 3
♣
A Q 10 9 3
N
W
E
S
♠
J 10 9
♥
A Q 7 2
♦
Q 7 6
♣
K 8 2
12 10 12 6
♠
K Q 7 5
♥
J 10 9 8
♦
9 5
♣
7 6 5
EW 3N; EW 2♥; EW 3♦; EW 3♣; Par −600
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
Pass Pass 4.00 0.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
2 ♠ S ♣ 9 −1 100 3.00 1.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♣ W ♦ A 3 110 2.00 2.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
2 ♠ S ♥ 5 −2 200 0.50 3.50 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
2 ♠ S ♦ 10 −2 200 0.50 3.50 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 2-Shepard-Walker
Board 14 East Deals None Vul
♠
10 9 6
♥
10 7 3 2
♦
8 7 5
♣
A 10 8
♠
K 8 5 4 2
♥
Q J
♦
Q 10 3 2
♣
J 6
N
W
E
S
♠
A Q J
♥
5 4
♦
A K 6 4
♣
7 5 4 3
4 9 14 13
♠
7 3
♥
A K 9 8 6
♦
J 9
♣
K Q 9 2
EW 3♠; NS 3♥; EW 3♦; NS 2♣; Par −100: NS 4♥×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ W ♥ 2 −1 50 4.00 0.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 2-Shepard-Walker
3 ♠ W ♥ 10 3 140 1.50 2.50 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
2 ♠ W ♥ 2 3 140 1.50 2.50 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
2 ♠ W ♥ 10 3 140 1.50 2.50 3-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠ W ♥ 2 3 140 1.50 2.50 4-Turner-Shepard vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul
♠
8 4
♥
K 5 4
♦
K 10 8 7 4
♣
10 9 8
♠
Q 10 7 3 2
♥
J 10 7 6
♦
6 5
♣
A 7
N
W
E
S
♠
J 9 5
♥
A 3 2
♦
Q 3 2
♣
Q J 6 4
6 7 10 17
♠
A K 6
♥
Q 9 8
♦
A J 9
♣
K 5 3 2
S 4♦; N 3♦; NS 3♣; NS 1N; EW 1♠; NS 1♥; Par +130
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT S ♠ 2 3 150 4.00 0.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
1 NT S ♠ 3 1 90 2.00 2.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
1 NT S ♠ 3 1 90 2.00 2.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
1 NT S ♠ 3 1 90 2.00 2.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 2-Shepard-Walker
2 ♥ W ♣ 8 2 110 0.00 4.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul
♠
K 7 6 3 2
♥
A K
♦
A Q 10 4
♣
J 4
♠
Q J 4
♥
J 8 5 3
♦
—
♣
A K Q 7 6 2
N
W
E
S
♠
A
♥
Q 9 2
♦
K 9 7 5 3 2
♣
9 5 3
17 13 9 1
♠
10 9 8 5
♥
10 7 6 4
♦
J 8 6
♣
10 8
EW 5♣; EW 3♥; EW 2N; NS 2♠; EW 1♦; Par −500: NS 5♠×−3
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♠ 3 −2 200 4.00 0.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♠ N ♥ 2 −2 100 3.00 1.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
2 NT W ♠ 3 2 120 2.00 2.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
3 ♣ W ♥ A 4 130 1.00 3.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♣ W ♥ A 5 150 0.00 4.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Shepard-Walker
Board 17 North Deals None Vul
♠
J 10
♥
Q J 10 8 6
♦
K 9 6 5 4 2
♣
—
♠
K 7 6 4
♥
9 7
♦
—
♣
A 9 8 7 5 4 3
N
W
E
S
♠
A 2
♥
A 5 4 2
♦
A Q 10
♣
Q J 10 6
7 7 17 9
♠
Q 9 8 5 3
♥
K 3
♦
J 8 7 3
♣
K 2
EW 7♣; EW 5N; W 3♠; EW 3♥; E 2♠; NS 2♦; Par −1100: NS 7♦×−5
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♣ E ♥ K 6 420 4.00 0.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Shepard-Walker
5 ♣ W ♦ 5 7 440 3.00 1.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT E ♠ 6 6 490 2.00 2.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
5 ♦× S ♥ 9 −3 500 1.00 3.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 NT E ♦ 3 7 520 0.00 4.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
10 9
♥
K J 9 8 5
♦
K 6 2
♣
7 6 2
♠
K J 4
♥
Q 2
♦
J 8 4
♣
A Q J 9 5
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 8 7 3 2
♥
6
♦
A Q 9 5 3
♣
10 8
7 14 8 11
♠
A 6 5
♥
A 10 7 4 3
♦
10 7
♣
K 4 3
EW 5♠; EW 5♦; EW 4♣; EW 1N; NS 1♥; Par −450
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ S ♣ A 2 110 4.00 0.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
1 NT W ♥ 9 1 90 3.00 1.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
3 ♠ E ♥ 3 4 170 2.00 2.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Shepard-Walker
4 ♥ N ♣ 10 −3 300 1.00 3.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ E ♦ 10 6 480 0.00 4.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
9
♥
A J 8 6 5 4 2
♦
K 6 5 4
♣
Q
♠
K 10 7 4 3
♥
10 3
♦
J 10
♣
A J 8 7
N
W
E
S
♠
A Q J 6 5
♥
Q
♦
A 9
♣
K 6 5 3 2
10 9 16 5
♠
8 2
♥
K 9 7
♦
Q 8 7 3 2
♣
10 9 4
EW 6♠; NS 4♥; EW 5♣; NS 3♦; Par −500: NS 7♥×−3
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥× N ♦ A 5 690 4.00 0.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
5 ♥× N ♦ A 5 650 3.00 1.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
4 ♠ E ♥ 7 5 650 2.00 2.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Shepard-Walker
4 ♠ E ♥ K 6 680 0.50 3.50 4-Turner-Shepard vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♠ W ♥ A 6 680 0.50 3.50 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul
♠
K 10
♥
A K 10 6 4
♦
10 9 8 5
♣
6 4
♠
A Q J 2
♥
9
♦
Q J 7 4 2
♣
A K 3
N
W
E
S
♠
7 6 5 3
♥
7 3 2
♦
K 6
♣
J 8 5 2
10 17 4 9
♠
9 8 4
♥
Q J 8 5
♦
A 3
♣
Q 10 9 7
E 3♠; NS 3♥; W 2♠; NS 1N; EW 2♦; EW 1♣; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠× W ♥ A −1 200 4.00 0.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
2 ♥ N ♦ K 3 140 3.00 1.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
1 ♦ W ♦ 10 −1 100 2.00 2.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♥ N ♦ K −1 100 1.00 3.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Shepard-Walker
3 ♠ W ♥ A 3 140 0.00 4.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
A J 10 7 3
♥
J
♦
A 6 5 4 3
♣
10 3
♠
Q 5 4
♥
7 6 4 2
♦
Q J
♣
A 5 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠
9
♥
K Q 8 5
♦
K 8 7 2
♣
K Q J 7
10 9 14 7
♠
K 8 6 2
♥
A 10 9 3
♦
10 9
♣
9 8 6
NS 3♠; EW 2♥; NS 1N; NS 2♦; EW 2♣; Par +140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♠ 7 −3 150 4.00 0.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♠ N ♣ K 2 110 2.50 1.50 3-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
2 ♠ N ♣ K 2 110 2.50 1.50 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
1 NT W ♠ 7 −1 50 1.00 3.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♠ N ♥ K −1 100 0.00 4.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Shepard-Walker
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
9 7 4
♥
K 9 8 7 5
♦
Q 6 3
♣
5 3
♠
Q 10 8
♥
J 6 2
♦
8 5 4
♣
A Q 7 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K 5
♥
Q 10 4 3
♦
K J
♣
10 9 8 6 4
5 9 9 17
♠
A J 6 3 2
♥
A
♦
A 10 9 7 2
♣
K J
NS 2♠; EW 3♣; EW 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♥; Par −100: NS 3♦×−1; NS 3♠×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 ♠ S ♥ 6 2 110 4.00 0.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
1 ♠ S ♥ 5 1 80 3.00 1.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Shepard-Walker
4 ♠ S ♣ 2 −1 50 1.50 2.50 4-Turner-Shepard vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ S ♣ A −1 50 1.50 2.50 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♣ W ♠ 9 4 130 0.00 4.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul
♠
K
♥
Q 9 5 4 3 2
♦
Q 7 6 5 2
♣
7
♠
Q J 10 8 7
♥
J 8 6
♦
8 3
♣
K 10 6
N
W
E
S
♠
A 9 5
♥
K
♦
A 9 4
♣
Q 9 8 4 3 2
7 7 13 13
♠
6 4 3 2
♥
A 10 7
♦
K J 10
♣
A J 5
NS 5♥; NS 5♦; EW 3♠; EW 4♣; NS 1N; Par +500: EW 5♠×−2; EW 6♣×−2
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♠ A 5 650 4.00 0.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Shepard-Walker
2 ♥ N ♣ 9 6 230 3.00 1.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ N ♠ A 5 200 1.50 2.50 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♥ N ♣ 9 5 200 1.50 2.50 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♠ W ♣ 7 3 140 0.00 4.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 24 West Deals None Vul
♠
J 9 7
♥
A Q 8
♦
Q J 10 7
♣
10 6 2
♠
8 6
♥
K 10 6 4 3
♦
A 9 5 2
♣
J 4
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 10 5 4 2
♥
7 2
♦
K 8 6 4 3
♣
Q
10 8 7 15
♠
A K 3
♥
J 9 5
♦
—
♣
A K 9 8 7 5 3
NS 7♣; NS 5N; NS 3♥; NS 2♠; NS 1♦; Par +1440
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♠ 4 7 520 4.00 0.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Shepard-Walker
5 ♣ S ♠ 8 6 420 3.00 1.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
5 ♣ S ♣ 4 5 400 2.00 2.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
2 ♣ S ♠ 8 6 170 0.50 3.50 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
2 ♣ S ♥ 6 6 170 0.50 3.50 4-Turner-Shepard vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
J 10 8 6 4
♥
K 10 4 3
♦
J 2
♣
4 2
♠
A 9 7 5 2
♥
A J 7 2
♦
—
♣
A K J 8
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 3
♥
8 6 5
♦
A Q 10 8 6
♣
9 6 5
5 17 8 10
♠
K
♥
Q 9
♦
K 9 7 5 4 3
♣
Q 10 7 3
EW 3N; EW 3♥; EW 2♠; EW 3♣; EW 1♦; Par −600
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠× W ♦ J −2 500 4.00 0.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Angione-Lagodimos
3 ♠ W ♦ J −3 300 3.00 1.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠ W ♦ J −2 200 2.00 2.00 2-Zissen-Ciolli vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
3 NT E ♦ 5 −1 100 1.00 3.00 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Shepard-Walker
2 ♠ W ♥ 3 2 110 0.00 4.00 5-Sandweiss-Cogdill vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008
