To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wed Eve Stac Wednesday Eve Session March 7, 2012
Scores after 7 rounds Average: 24.0 Section E
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
1 37.50 18.00 C Cheryl Rankin - Carol Adair
2 61.46 29.50 C 2 2 2 0.99(A) Osman Guner - Jim Ciolli
3 50.00 24.00 C 3 3 0.71(A) Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter
4 63.54 30.50 C 1 1 1 1.42(A) Don Sandweiss - Linda MacKey
5 42.71 20.50 C Susan Taylor - Martha Walker
6 46.88 22.50 C Judy Shepard - Roy Shepard
8 47.92 23.00 B Kathie Angione - Dan Bloch
NS 2♠; EW 2♥; EW 1N; NS 2♦; EW 2♣; Par +100: EW 2Nx-1; EW 3♣x-1; EW 3♥x-1
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠ N ♦ A 3 140 2.00 0.00 2-Guner-Ciolli vs 4-Sandweiss-MacKey
3 ♦ N ♥ A 3 110 1.00 1.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 1-Rankin-Adair
2 ♥ W ♦ 3 2 110 0.00 2.00 5-Taylor-Walker vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul
♠ J 8 ♥ 5 ♦ A K Q 10 8 ♣ K Q 5 3 2
♠ 10 6 5 3 2 ♥ 7 3 ♦ 4 ♣ J 9 8 7 6
N
W
E
S
♠ K Q 9 4 ♥ A K 9 8 ♦ J 7 5 3 ♣ A
♠ A 7 ♥ Q J 10 6 4 2 ♦ 9 6 2 ♣ 10 4
EW 3♠; EW 1N; NS 2♦; NS 1♥; NS 1♣; Par −140
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S ♣ 9 3 600 2.00 0.00 5-Taylor-Walker vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
3 ♥ S ♦ 4 -1 100 0.50 1.50 2-Guner-Ciolli vs 4-Sandweiss-MacKey
3 NT N ♠ 4 -1 100 0.50 1.50 8-Angione-Bloch vs 1-Rankin-Adair
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul
♠ 10 9 5 ♥ J ♦ Q 8 5 3 2 ♣ A 10 8 6
♠ K Q J 6 3 2 ♥ K 8 5 ♦ 10 6 ♣ 5 2
N
W
E
S
♠ A 4 ♥ Q 7 4 ♦ A 7 ♣ K Q 9 7 4 3
♠ 8 7 ♥ A 10 9 6 3 2 ♦ K J 9 4 ♣ J
NS 4♦; EW 2♠; NS 2♥; EW 1N; EW 2♣; Par +130
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ W ♥ J -2 200 1.50 0.50 5-Taylor-Walker vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
4 ♠ W ♥ J -2 200 1.50 0.50 8-Angione-Bloch vs 1-Rankin-Adair
4 ♠ W ♥ J -1 100 0.00 2.00 2-Guner-Ciolli vs 4-Sandweiss-MacKey
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul
♠ 8 2 ♥ Q 10 7 4 2 ♦ K 9 7 6 ♣ Q J
♠ J 9 7 5 ♥ 8 3 ♦ Q 8 4 ♣ 8 7 5 2
N
W
E
S
♠ A Q 10 3 ♥ A K J 9 ♦ J 10 5 ♣ K 6
♠ K 6 4 ♥ 6 5 ♦ A 3 2 ♣ A 10 9 4 3
NS 2N; EW 2♠; NS 2♣; NS 1♥; NS 1♦; Par +120
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT E ♣ 4 -2 200 2.00 0.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 1-Rankin-Adair
1 NT S ♣ 8 2 120 1.00 1.00 5-Taylor-Walker vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
2 NT E ♥ 6 2 120 0.00 2.00 2-Guner-Ciolli vs 4-Sandweiss-MacKey
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul
♠ 10 6 5 ♥ J 8 7 ♦ 9 2 ♣ A 10 7 5 2
♠ A K 4 ♥ K 6 2 ♦ Q 10 8 7 5 ♣ Q J
N
W
E
S
♠ J 9 8 7 2 ♥ Q 9 4 3 ♦ A K ♣ K 4
♠ Q 3 ♥ A 10 5 ♦ J 6 4 3 ♣ 9 8 6 3
E 5♠; W 4♠; EW 4♥; EW 3N; E 4♦; W 3♦; Par −450
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ E ♦ 3 4 420 2.00 0.00 4-Sandweiss-MacKey vs 1-Rankin-Adair
3 NT E ♥ 5 4 430 1.00 1.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Taylor-Walker
4 ♠ E ♣ 8 5 450 0.00 2.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 2-Guner-Ciolli
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul
♠ — ♥ Q 10 8 4 2 ♦ Q 10 9 4 ♣ A Q J 6
♠ J 7 6 3 ♥ 3 ♦ K 8 6 5 3 2 ♣ K 2
N
W
E
S
♠ Q 9 8 2 ♥ A J 7 ♦ 7 ♣ 9 7 5 4 3
♠ A K 10 5 4 ♥ K 9 6 5 ♦ A J ♣ 10 8
NS 6♥; S 5N; N 4N; NS 2♠; NS 3♣; NS 2♦; Par +980
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♦ 7 4 420 2.00 0.00 4-Sandweiss-MacKey vs 1-Rankin-Adair
2 NT N ♣ 5 3 150 1.00 1.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Taylor-Walker
4 ♥ N ♦ 7 -1 50 0.00 2.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 2-Guner-Ciolli
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul
♠ A K Q ♥ K 10 9 7 5 4 2 ♦ 10 5 ♣ Q
♠ 10 8 7 ♥ Q 8 6 3 ♦ A 8 2 ♣ K J 5
N
W
E
S
♠ 5 4 2 ♥ A J ♦ J 6 ♣ A 10 6 4 3 2
♠ J 9 6 3 ♥ — ♦ K Q 9 7 4 3 ♣ 9 8 7
EW 3N; NS 3♠; NS 2♥; NS 3♦; EW 1♣; Par −200: NS 4♦x-1; NS 4♠x-1
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ S ♦ J -1 100 2.00 0.00 4-Sandweiss-MacKey vs 1-Rankin-Adair
3 ♥ N ♣ A -2 200 1.00 1.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 2-Guner-Ciolli
3 NT S ♥ 4 -3 300 0.00 2.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Taylor-Walker
Board 8 West Deals None Vul
♠ A Q 9 7 6 4 ♥ Q J 8 5 ♦ K J ♣ 7
♠ J 8 5 ♥ 7 3 ♦ 7 4 ♣ 10 8 5 4 3 2
N
W
E
S
♠ 10 2 ♥ A 10 9 6 ♦ A Q 9 5 3 ♣ K 6
♠ K 3 ♥ K 4 2 ♦ 10 8 6 2 ♣ A Q J 9
N 5♠; NS 4N; S 4♠; N 4♥; S 3♥; NS 3♦; N 2♣; S 1♣; Par +450
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ N ♠ 2 6 480 1.50 0.50 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Taylor-Walker
4 ♠ N ♥ A 6 480 1.50 0.50 4-Sandweiss-MacKey vs 1-Rankin-Adair
2 ♠ N ♥ A 3 140 0.00 2.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 2-Guner-Ciolli
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul
♠ Q 10 9 ♥ A J 7 5 ♦ A 10 7 ♣ A 8 7
♠ J ♥ 8 6 ♦ K 8 5 3 ♣ K 10 9 5 4 3
N
W
E
S
♠ A 8 7 5 2 ♥ K Q 4 2 ♦ J 9 ♣ 6 2
♠ K 6 4 3 ♥ 10 9 3 ♦ Q 6 4 2 ♣ Q J
NS 3N; N 3♠; S 2♠; NS 2♥; EW 2♣; NS 1♦; Par +400
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT N ♠ 5 5 210 2.00 0.00 4-Sandweiss-MacKey vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
2 NT N ♠ 5 2 120 1.00 1.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 NT N ♠ 3 -1 50 0.00 2.00 5-Taylor-Walker vs 2-Guner-Ciolli
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul
♠ A 6 4 2 ♥ J 10 ♦ 10 7 ♣ A 7 5 4 3
♠ K Q 10 9 5 ♥ 8 7 6 5 3 ♦ J 8 ♣ 10
N
W
E
S
♠ 8 7 3 ♥ K 4 2 ♦ K 9 6 4 3 ♣ Q J
♠ J ♥ A Q 9 ♦ A Q 5 2 ♣ K 9 8 6 2
NS 7♣; NS 5N; NS 4♦; NS 2♠; NS 2♥; Par +2140
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S ♠ 9 5 660 2.00 0.00 4-Sandweiss-MacKey vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
4 ♣ S ♠ K 7 190 1.00 1.00 5-Taylor-Walker vs 2-Guner-Ciolli
3 ♣ S ♠ 9 6 170 0.00 2.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 11 South Deals None Vul
♠ J 10 9 8 5 ♥ K 9 2 ♦ A 4 2 ♣ J 7
♠ A K 2 ♥ Q J 10 8 5 3 ♦ 9 ♣ Q 3 2
N
W
E
S
♠ Q 7 6 4 ♥ 6 ♦ K Q 10 7 6 3 ♣ 6 4
♠ 3 ♥ A 7 4 ♦ J 8 5 ♣ A K 10 9 8 5
NS 2N; NS 2♣; N 1♥; EW 1♦; Par +120
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ W ♣ J -3 150 2.00 0.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♥ W ♣ J -1 50 1.00 1.00 5-Taylor-Walker vs 2-Guner-Ciolli
3 ♣ S ♠ A -2 100 0.00 2.00 4-Sandweiss-MacKey vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul
♠ Q J 10 3 ♥ K 8 7 2 ♦ K ♣ 10 9 7 6
♠ 4 ♥ 10 5 3 ♦ Q 10 7 4 2 ♣ A 8 5 3
N
W
E
S
♠ A 9 8 ♥ A Q 4 ♦ A J 9 5 3 ♣ Q 2
♠ K 7 6 5 2 ♥ J 9 6 ♦ 8 6 ♣ K J 4
EW 3N; EW 5♦; EW 2♥; NS 1♠; EW 1♣; Par −400
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT E ♠ 5 2 120 1.50 0.50 4-Sandweiss-MacKey vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
1 NT E ♠ 5 2 120 1.50 0.50 8-Angione-Bloch vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
1 NT E ♠ 5 3 150 0.00 2.00 5-Taylor-Walker vs 2-Guner-Ciolli
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul
♠ Q 6 ♥ Q J 10 9 3 ♦ A Q 8 3 ♣ 9 3
♠ 10 7 5 4 ♥ — ♦ 10 5 4 2 ♣ Q 8 5 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠ K J 2 ♥ A K 7 4 ♦ 9 7 6 ♣ J 10 7
♠ A 9 8 3 ♥ 8 6 5 2 ♦ K J ♣ A K 6
NS 4♥; S 3N; N 2N; S 2♠; NS 2♦; N 1♠; EW 1♣; Par +620
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♣ J 4 620 1.50 0.50 1-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Guner-Ciolli
4 ♥ N ♣ J 4 620 1.50 0.50 6-Shepard-Shepard vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
1 ♥ N ♠ 2 4 170 0.00 2.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 4-Sandweiss-MacKey
Board 14 East Deals None Vul
♠ A 9 8 7 3 2 ♥ Q J 10 9 4 ♦ 5 ♣ 3
♠ J 6 ♥ 5 2 ♦ A J 7 ♣ A J 9 5 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠ Q 10 5 ♥ A 8 6 3 ♦ 6 2 ♣ K Q 10 6
♠ K 4 ♥ K 7 ♦ K Q 10 9 8 4 3 ♣ 8 7
NS 3♠; EW 2N; NS 2♥; EW 3♣; NS 2♦; Par +100: EW 3Nx-1; EW 4♣x-1
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ S ♠ J 3 110 2.00 0.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 4-Sandweiss-MacKey
4 ♣ W ♦ 5 -1 50 1.00 1.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Guner-Ciolli
4 ♣ E ♦ K 4 130 0.00 2.00 6-Shepard-Shepard vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul
♠ A 7 5 2 ♥ Q 6 5 3 ♦ J 8 7 ♣ 4 3
♠ Q J 9 ♥ 7 4 ♦ 9 6 4 2 ♣ J 7 6 2
N
W
E
S
♠ K 10 4 3 ♥ 9 2 ♦ A K Q 10 3 ♣ A 5
♠ 8 6 ♥ A K J 10 8 ♦ 5 ♣ K Q 10 9 8
NS 4♥; EW 2♠; EW 3♦; NS 2♣; Par +300: EW 4♠x-2; EW 5♦x-2
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♦ A 4 620 2.00 0.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 4-Sandweiss-MacKey
2 ♥ N ♦ K 4 170 1.00 1.00 6-Shepard-Shepard vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♦ E ♥ A 4 130 0.00 2.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Guner-Ciolli
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul
♠ 10 7 6 ♥ K 8 7 ♦ A 4 2 ♣ A 7 6 5
♠ A Q 2 ♥ J 5 4 2 ♦ 10 9 5 3 ♣ J 4
N
W
E
S
♠ 5 4 3 ♥ A 9 6 ♦ J 8 7 6 ♣ 10 3 2
♠ K J 9 8 ♥ Q 10 3 ♦ K Q ♣ K Q 9 8
NS 4♠; NS 3N; NS 4♣; NS 2♥; NS 2♦; Par +420
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S ♥ 2 4 430 2.00 0.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 4-Sandweiss-MacKey
3 NT N ♦ 6 3 400 1.00 1.00 6-Shepard-Shepard vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♣ S ♣ J 4 130 0.00 2.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Guner-Ciolli
Board 17 North Deals None Vul
♠ 6 4 ♥ A J 10 6 ♦ J 10 7 4 ♣ 10 5 3
♠ K 8 2 ♥ K 8 5 ♦ A K Q 9 ♣ J 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠ A J 10 9 ♥ 7 4 ♦ 3 2 ♣ A K 9 8 7
♠ Q 7 5 3 ♥ Q 9 3 2 ♦ 8 6 5 ♣ Q 6
W 6♣; W 5N; W 5♠; E 4♠; E 3N; W 5♦; E 5♣; E 4♦; EW 2♥; Par −920
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ E ♦ 8 -2 100 2.00 0.00 2-Guner-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT W ♦ 7 5 460 1.00 1.00 6-Shepard-Shepard vs 1-Rankin-Adair
3 NT W ♥ 6 6 490 0.00 2.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 5-Taylor-Walker
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul
♠ K 5 ♥ A J 9 5 ♦ K 10 9 2 ♣ A 9 7
♠ 9 ♥ K Q 6 4 3 ♦ A Q 7 ♣ K 6 4 3
N
W
E
S
♠ Q J 10 7 6 3 ♥ 10 7 2 ♦ 8 4 ♣ Q 10
♠ A 8 4 2 ♥ 8 ♦ J 6 5 3 ♣ J 8 5 2
NS 2N; NS 3♦; NS 2♣; NS 1♠; W 1♥; Par +120
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ E ♥ 8 -4 200 2.00 0.00 6-Shepard-Shepard vs 1-Rankin-Adair
3 ♥ W -1 50 1.00 1.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 5-Taylor-Walker
2 ♥ W ♠ K 2 110 0.00 2.00 2-Guner-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul
♠ 9 5 ♥ Q 3 ♦ A K Q 8 6 ♣ K J 7 3
♠ A K Q 10 6 4 ♥ A 2 ♦ 7 5 2 ♣ 8 2
N
W
E
S
♠ J 3 2 ♥ K J 8 7 4 ♦ J 3 ♣ Q 10 6
♠ 8 7 ♥ 10 9 6 5 ♦ 10 9 4 ♣ A 9 5 4
EW 3♠; EW 2♥; NS 2♦; NS 2♣; Par −140
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♦ N ♠ J -1 50 2.00 0.00 2-Guner-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♠ W ♦ Q 4 170 0.50 1.50 6-Shepard-Shepard vs 1-Rankin-Adair
3 ♠ W ♦ A 4 170 0.50 1.50 8-Angione-Bloch vs 5-Taylor-Walker
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul
♠ Q 8 7 6 5 3 ♥ K 8 3 ♦ 9 3 ♣ 9 5
♠ 10 9 ♥ Q J 9 5 4 ♦ K Q 8 6 ♣ Q J
N
W
E
S
♠ K J 4 ♥ A 10 ♦ 10 5 4 ♣ 7 6 4 3 2
♠ A 2 ♥ 7 6 2 ♦ A J 7 2 ♣ A K 10 8
NS 3♠; NS 1N; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; N 1♣; Par +140
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ N ♥ A 4 170 2.00 0.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 5-Taylor-Walker
2 ♠ S ♠ 10 3 140 1.00 1.00 2-Guner-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♥ W ♦ 3 -1 100 0.00 2.00 6-Shepard-Shepard vs 1-Rankin-Adair
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul
♠ K J 9 4 ♥ 9 8 3 2 ♦ A Q J 8 ♣ A
♠ 8 3 ♥ Q J 6 5 ♦ 7 5 3 ♣ Q 6 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠ A 7 6 5 2 ♥ K 10 4 ♦ 10 6 2 ♣ J 10
♠ Q 10 ♥ A 7 ♦ K 9 4 ♣ K 9 8 7 5 3
NS 3N; NS 5♦; NS 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 4♣; Par +600
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♠ 5 4 630 1.00 1.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Taylor-Walker
3 NT N ♠ 6 4 630 1.00 1.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Sandweiss-MacKey
3 NT N ♠ 5 4 630 1.00 1.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul
♠ K Q 9 8 4 ♥ K 10 7 ♦ J 9 ♣ A Q 4
♠ J 2 ♥ J 9 8 6 5 ♦ 10 7 2 ♣ 8 7 2
N
W
E
S
♠ A 7 ♥ 4 3 2 ♦ K 4 3 ♣ J 10 6 5 3
♠ 10 6 5 3 ♥ A Q ♦ A Q 8 6 5 ♣ K 9
NS 6N; NS 6♠; NS 4♥; NS 5♦; NS 4♣; Par +990
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 ♠ N ♣ 5 6 980 2.00 0.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
4 ♠ N ♥ 4 6 480 1.00 1.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Taylor-Walker
4 ♠ N ♣ J 5 450 0.00 2.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Sandweiss-MacKey
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul
♠ 9 8 7 ♥ A J 10 4 3 ♦ 4 3 ♣ 10 7 3
♠ Q 5 ♥ Q 2 ♦ A 10 8 7 ♣ A Q 9 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠ J 4 3 ♥ K 8 5 ♦ Q 5 2 ♣ K J 6 5
♠ A K 10 6 2 ♥ 9 7 6 ♦ K J 9 6 ♣ 8
EW 2N; NS 2♠; NS 2♥; EW 3♣; EW 2♦; Par −120
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♣ W ♠ 9 -1 100 2.00 0.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Taylor-Walker
3 ♣ W ♦ 4 3 110 1.00 1.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Sandweiss-MacKey
1 NT E ♠ A 2 120 0.00 2.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
Board 24 West Deals None Vul
♠ 4 3 ♥ K 3 2 ♦ A Q J 2 ♣ Q 10 9 3
♠ Q 9 8 6 ♥ A 10 8 6 5 ♦ 9 3 ♣ A 5
N
W
E
S
♠ A K J 10 7 ♥ Q 9 ♦ 7 6 ♣ J 7 4 2
♠ 5 2 ♥ J 7 4 ♦ K 10 8 5 4 ♣ K 8 6
EW 3♠; EW 3♥; EW 1N; NS 2♦; NS 1♣; Par −140
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ N ♠ A -1 50 2.00 0.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Sandweiss-MacKey
2 ♠ E ♦ 8 3 140 1.00 1.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Taylor-Walker
3 ♠ E ♦ K 4 170 0.00 2.00 8-Angione-Bloch vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul
♠ 3 ♥ J 5 4 2 ♦ J 9 5 ♣ K 10 9 6 3
♠ A 8 6 5 ♥ A K 8 6 3 ♦ K 6 3 ♣ 4
N
W
E
S
♠ K 4 2 ♥ Q 10 9 ♦ A 10 8 7 ♣ J 7 2
♠ Q J 10 9 7 ♥ 7 ♦ Q 4 2 ♣ A Q 8 5
EW 4♥; EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 3♦; NS 2♣; Par −500: NS 5♣x-3
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♠ 3 -2 200 2.00 0.00 4-Sandweiss-MacKey vs 5-Taylor-Walker
3 ♥ W ♠ 3 3 140 0.50 1.50 1-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ W ♠ 3 3 140 0.50 1.50 2-Guner-Ciolli vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
Board 26 East Deals Both Vul
♠ 10 ♥ A Q 7 5 3 2 ♦ 6 4 3 ♣ A 9 4
♠ A K J 9 6 5 2 ♥ K J ♦ J ♣ K J 8
N
W
E
S
♠ 3 ♥ 10 9 8 ♦ K Q 10 8 5 2 ♣ 6 5 3
♠ Q 8 7 4 ♥ 6 4 ♦ A 9 7 ♣ Q 10 7 2
NS 2N; NS 2♥; S 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1♦; N 1♣; Par +120
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ W ♦ 3 -1 100 1.50 0.50 1-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠ W ♠ 10 -1 100 1.50 0.50 2-Guner-Ciolli vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
2 ♠ W ♣ 4 3 140 0.00 2.00 4-Sandweiss-MacKey vs 5-Taylor-Walker
Board 27 South Deals None Vul
♠ A 8 6 ♥ K Q J 8 3 ♦ 10 6 2 ♣ Q 7
♠ J 3 2 ♥ 10 9 7 ♦ A K J 9 4 ♣ J 9
N
W
E
S
♠ 9 7 ♥ A 5 4 2 ♦ Q 8 7 ♣ K 8 6 3
♠ K Q 10 5 4 ♥ 6 ♦ 5 3 ♣ A 10 5 4 2
NS 4♠; NS 2♥; NS 1N; NS 2♣; EW 1♦; Par +420
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ S ♦ A 4 420 2.00 0.00 4-Sandweiss-MacKey vs 5-Taylor-Walker
3 ♠ S ♦ A 4 170 0.50 1.50 1-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♥ N ♦ 7 4 170 0.50 1.50 2-Guner-Ciolli vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
Board 28 West Deals N-S Vul
♠ Q 10 7 6 3 ♥ A 3 2 ♦ 8 4 ♣ K J 9
♠ A 5 2 ♥ J 9 7 4 ♦ Q 9 2 ♣ 7 5 2
N
W
E
S
♠ 9 ♥ — ♦ K J 10 7 6 5 3 ♣ A 8 6 4 3
♠ K J 8 4 ♥ K Q 10 8 6 5 ♦ A ♣ Q 10
N 5♠; S 4♠; NS 4♥; EW 4♦; EW 4♣; Par +300: EW 6♣x-2; EW 6♦x-2
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ N ♦ 3 5 650 2.00 0.00 4-Sandweiss-MacKey vs 5-Taylor-Walker
5 ♦ x E ♥ K -1 100 1.00 1.00 2-Guner-Ciolli vs 6-Shepard-Shepard
5 ♥ x S ♦ Q -1 200 0.00 2.00 1-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008
