NEWSLETTER | PHOTOS | RECIPES | CONVENTION CARD | COMMENT | MASTERPOINT RACE
Click --> HAND PRINTOUT to view all hands or RECAP for recap format.
To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session November 14, 2012
Scores after 7 rounds Average: 31.5 Section E
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
5 66.67 42.00 C 1 1 1 0.80(A) Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter
4 61.11 38.50 B 2 2 0.56(A) Cheryl Rankin - Carol Adair
1 51.59 32.50 C 3 3 2 0.40(A) Pat Woodford - Jim Woodford
6 49.21 31.00 B Linda MacKey - Jim Ciolli
2 46.83 29.50 B Liz Piazzoni - Gary Piazzoni
7 31.75 20.00 C Vickie Palmer - Darrel Palmer
3 30.16 19.00 C Roy Shepard - Judy Shepard
8 62.70 39.50 A NE John Lagodimos - Kathie Angione
EW 3N; EW 3♠; EW 4♦; EW 3♣; NS 1♥; Par −400 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♠ 2 −2 100 3.00 0.00 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Woodford-Woodford
2 ♥ N ♦ 8 −1 50 2.00 1.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-MacKey-Ciolli
3 ♦ E ♥ K 4 130 1.00 2.00 3-Shepard-Shepard vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
3 NT E ♠ 2 3 400 0.00 3.00 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 4-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♥; EW 3N; EW 5♦; EW 4♣; NS 1♠; Par −450 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♦ W ♠ 8 −2 100 2.50 0.50 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 4-Rankin-Adair
4 ♥× E ♠ K −1 100 2.50 0.50 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Woodford-Woodford
3 ♥ W ♠ 4 4 170 1.00 2.00 3-Shepard-Shepard vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
4 ♥ E ♠ K 5 450 0.00 3.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-MacKey-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♠; E 3N; W 2N; E 2♥; W 1♥; E 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −650 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ W ♥ 2 5 200 2.50 0.50 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-MacKey-Ciolli
2 ♠ W ♦ 9 5 200 2.50 0.50 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Woodford-Woodford
2 ♠ W ♣ 4 6 230 1.00 2.00 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 4-Rankin-Adair
3 NT W ♣ 4 3 600 0.00 3.00 3-Shepard-Shepard vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3N; NS 2♠; NS 3♦; NS 2♣; NS 1♥; Par +600 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♣ J 3 600 3.00 0.00 6-MacKey-Ciolli vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
1 NT N ♠ 8 3 150 2.00 1.00 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
2 ♠ N ♠ 7 3 140 1.00 2.00 4-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Woodford-Woodford
1 NT N ♠ 7 1 90 0.00 3.00 3-Shepard-Shepard vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
W 4♥; E 3♥; EW 2N; EW 2♦; NS 1♠; EW 1♣; Par −420 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ S ♥ 4 2 110 3.00 0.00 6-MacKey-Ciolli vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
Pass Pass 1.50 1.50 4-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Woodford-Woodford
Pass Pass 1.50 1.50 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
2 ♠ S ♥ 8 −1 100 0.00 3.00 3-Shepard-Shepard vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 5♠; NS 4N; NS 2♥; NS 3♣; NS 2♦; Par +450 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♦ 6 5 460 3.00 0.00 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 NT N ♥ 3 4 430 1.50 1.50 4-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Woodford-Woodford
3 NT S ♣ 10 4 430 1.50 1.50 6-MacKey-Ciolli vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
4 ♠ S ♥ 9 −1 50 0.00 3.00 3-Shepard-Shepard vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E 3♠; EW 3♥; W 2♠; NS 2♦; NS 2♣; Par −140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♣ S ♦ 5 3 110 3.00 0.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
2 NT N ♥ J −1 100 2.00 1.00 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Shepard-Shepard
5 ♦ N ♣ 4 −2 200 1.00 2.00 4-Rankin-Adair vs 6-MacKey-Ciolli
3 ♣ S ♦ 3 −3 300 0.00 3.00 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Woodford-Woodford
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♥; EW 5♣; EW 3♦; EW 1N; NS 1♠; Par −450 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♠ 3 −2 100 3.00 0.00 4-Rankin-Adair vs 6-MacKey-Ciolli
3 ♠ N ♥ 8 −2 100 2.00 1.00 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Shepard-Shepard
3 ♣ W ♠ K 5 150 1.00 2.00 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Woodford-Woodford
3 ♣ W ♦ 4 6 170 0.00 3.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♦; EW 4♣; EW 2N; S 2♠; NS 2♥; N 1♠; Par −130 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♦ W ♣ 9 3 110 3.00 0.00 4-Rankin-Adair vs 6-MacKey-Ciolli
4 ♣ W 4 130 1.50 1.50 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
4 ♣ W ♦ 6 4 130 1.50 1.50 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Shepard-Shepard
3 NT W ♣ 9 3 600 0.00 3.00 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Woodford-Woodford
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 5N; NS 5♠; NS 5♥; NS 4♣; NS 3♦; Par +660 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♣ J 6 680 2.50 0.50 1-Woodford-Woodford vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
4 ♥ N ♣ J 6 680 2.50 0.50 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
5 ♥ N ♣ J 5 650 0.50 2.50 6-MacKey-Ciolli vs 3-Shepard-Shepard
5 ♥ N ♦ A 5 650 0.50 2.50 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 2♥; NS 3♦; S 2♣; N 1♣; Par +400 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♦ N ♠ K 2 90 3.00 0.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
3 NT N ♠ K −1 50 1.00 2.00 1-Woodford-Woodford vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 NT N −1 50 1.00 2.00 6-MacKey-Ciolli vs 3-Shepard-Shepard
3 NT N ♠ K −1 50 1.00 2.00 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E 2N; W 1N; EW 1♠; E 1♥; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −120 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♦ S ♥ Q −1 100 2.50 0.50 1-Woodford-Woodford vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♦ S ♥ Q −1 100 2.50 0.50 6-MacKey-Ciolli vs 3-Shepard-Shepard
3 ♦ S ♠ 3 −2 200 0.50 2.50 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
3 ♦ S ♥ Q −2 200 0.50 2.50 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 5♥; NS 3N; NS 4♦; NS 2♠; NS 3♣; Par +650 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ S ♠ A 4 620 2.00 1.00 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Shepard-Shepard
4 ♥ S ♣ 4 4 620 2.00 1.00 6-MacKey-Ciolli vs 1-Woodford-Woodford
4 ♥ N ♣ 8 4 620 2.00 1.00 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ S ♣ 10 −2 200 0.00 3.00 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 3♥; NS 4♣; NS 3♦; EW 1N; Par +100: EW 4♥×−1; EW 4♠×−1 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♣ S ♠ K 4 130 3.00 0.00 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Shepard-Shepard
4 ♥ E ♦ 3 −2 100 2.00 1.00 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Rankin-Adair
4 ♠ E ♣ Q −1 50 1.00 2.00 6-MacKey-Ciolli vs 1-Woodford-Woodford
4 ♥× E ♣ Q 4 590 0.00 3.00 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♥; NS 1N; EW 1♦; Par +140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ S ♣ K 4 170 2.50 0.50 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Shepard-Shepard
2 ♥ S ♣ K 4 170 2.50 0.50 6-MacKey-Ciolli vs 1-Woodford-Woodford
4 ♥ S ♣ K −1 100 0.50 2.50 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Rankin-Adair
4 ♥ S ♣ K −1 100 0.50 2.50 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 6♠; NS 4♥; NS 3♦; NS 1N; Par +980 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ N ♦ 10 6 480 2.50 0.50 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
4 ♠ N ♦ 10 6 480 2.50 0.50 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 6-MacKey-Ciolli
2 ♠ N ♣ 5 6 230 0.50 2.50 1-Woodford-Woodford vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♠ N ♦ 10 6 230 0.50 2.50 3-Shepard-Shepard vs 4-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♠; EW 5♣; E 4♦; W 3♦; NS 1♥; Par −450 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♣ E ♥ Q 5 150 3.00 0.00 1-Woodford-Woodford vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠ E ♥ 3 5 200 2.00 1.00 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 6-MacKey-Ciolli
3 NT E ♥ 3 4 430 0.50 2.50 3-Shepard-Shepard vs 4-Rankin-Adair
3 NT E ♥ 3 4 430 0.50 2.50 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 2N; NS 2♠; NS 2♥; EW 2♦; NS 2♣; Par +100: EW 3♦×−1 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♦ 5 3 600 3.00 0.00 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 6-MacKey-Ciolli
3 NT N ♦ 5 −1 100 2.00 1.00 3-Shepard-Shepard vs 4-Rankin-Adair
4 ♠ S ♦ A −2 200 0.50 2.50 1-Woodford-Woodford vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT N ♦ 5 −2 200 0.50 2.50 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♠; NS 3♣; NS 1N; Par +420 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ N ♥ A 4 420 2.50 0.50 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 6-MacKey-Ciolli
4 ♠ N ♥ A 4 420 2.50 0.50 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
1 ♠ N ♥ A 4 170 1.00 2.00 1-Woodford-Woodford vs 3-Shepard-Shepard
5 ♠× N ♥ A −1 100 0.00 3.00 4-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♠; EW 3♥; NS 3♣; EW 1N; Par +500: EW 5♥×−2 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠× S ♥ A 5 1130 3.00 0.00 1-Woodford-Woodford vs 3-Shepard-Shepard
4 ♥× W ♠ 7 −2 500 2.00 1.00 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
2 ♠ S ♥ A 5 200 0.50 2.50 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 6-MacKey-Ciolli
3 ♠ S ♥ K 5 200 0.50 2.50 4-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♠; EW 5♥; EW 3N; NS 3♣; NS 1♦; Par −450 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♣ S ♥ 2 4 130 3.00 0.00 8-Lagodimos-Angione vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
4 ♣ S ♠ A −1 100 2.00 1.00 4-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♠ E ♦ A 3 140 1.00 2.00 1-Woodford-Woodford vs 3-Shepard-Shepard
4 ♠ E ♦ A 5 450 0.00 3.00 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 6-MacKey-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008