NEWSLETTER | PHOTOS | RECIPES | CONVENTION CARD | COMMENT | MASTERPOINT RACE
Click --> HAND PRINTOUT to view all hands or RECAP for recap format.
To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session January 30, 2013
Scores after 7 rounds Average: 31.5 Section E
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
2 63.49 40.00 C 1 1 1 0.80(A) Jim Woodford - Pat Woodford
6 59.52 37.50 B 2 2 0.56(A) Hiroko Kitamura - Judi Bunch
4 57.14 36.00 B 3 3 0.40(A) Donna Rafenstein - Carol Adair
1 50.00 31.50 C 2 0.17(C) Roy Shepard - Judy Shepard
3 44.44 28.00 B Jim Ciolli - Richard Keplinger
8 40.48 25.50 C Fran Hunter - Doral Hunter
5 32.54 20.50 C Vickie Palmer - Darrel Palmer
7 52.38 33.00 A NE Kathie Angione - John Lagodimos
EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 1♥; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −120 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠× E ♥ 6 −2 300 3.00 0.00 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
2 NT W ♣ 6 −1 50 2.00 1.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
1 NT W ♣ 6 2 120 1.00 2.00 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
3 NT W ♣ 6 3 400 0.00 3.00 3-Ciolli-Keplinger vs 7-Angione-Lagodimos
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♥; NS 3N; EW 1♠; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −200: NS 4N×−1 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ E ♣ 2 −1 50 3.00 0.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
3 ♥ E ♣ 2 3 140 2.00 1.00 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
3 ♥ E ♣ 2 4 170 1.00 2.00 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
3 ♠ S ♥ 2 −4 400 0.00 3.00 3-Ciolli-Keplinger vs 7-Angione-Lagodimos
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♥; EW 3N; EW 3♣; EW 1♦; Par −620 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ W ♣ 8 −1 100 2.50 0.50 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
4 ♥ W ♦ Q −1 100 2.50 0.50 3-Ciolli-Keplinger vs 7-Angione-Lagodimos
1 ♣ N ♥ A −2 100 1.00 2.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
2 ♥ W ♠ K 4 170 0.00 3.00 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 2N; NS 2♦; EW 1♠; EW 1♥; EW 1♣; Par −120 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT E ♦ 8 −1 100 2.50 0.50 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
2 ♣ W ♠ 5 −1 100 2.50 0.50 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
1 NT W ♥ 2 2 120 1.00 2.00 3-Ciolli-Keplinger vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
1 ♥× N ♦ 3 −2 500 0.00 3.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 7-Angione-Lagodimos
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♥; EW 5♦; EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 1♣; Par −450 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ W ♥ 2 5 150 3.00 0.00 3-Ciolli-Keplinger vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
2 ♥ W ♣ J 5 200 2.00 1.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 7-Angione-Lagodimos
5 ♦ E ♠ A 5 400 1.00 2.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
3 NT W ♣ 3 5 460 0.00 3.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♥; NS 1N; W 2♦; NS 1♠; E 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ E ♠ 6 −2 200 3.00 0.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
2 ♠ N ♥ A −1 50 1.50 1.50 3-Ciolli-Keplinger vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
4 ♥ S ♦ 3 −1 50 1.50 1.50 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 7-Angione-Lagodimos
3 ♥ E ♠ 6 4 170 0.00 3.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3N; EW 4♣; NS 2♦; EW 1♠; NS 1♥; Par −500: NS 4♦×−2 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♣ W ♠ 8 −2 200 3.00 0.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
3 ♣ W ♥ 2 3 110 1.00 2.00 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
3 ♣ W ♦ 4 3 110 1.00 2.00 7-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
3 ♣ W ♥ 2 3 110 1.00 2.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Ciolli-Keplinger
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♠; EW 2N; NS 2♥; EW 3♦; N 2♣; S 1♣; Par +100: EW 3N×−1; EW 4♦×−1 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠ N ♥ Q 3 140 2.50 0.50 7-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
2 ♠ S ♦ 2 3 140 2.50 0.50 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Ciolli-Keplinger
3 ♣ N ♥ Q −1 50 1.00 2.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
2 ♦ E ♣ 3 3 110 0.00 3.00 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♠; EW 3♥; EW 2N; EW 3♣; EW 1♦; Par −620 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♦ 7 −1 100 3.00 0.00 7-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
4 ♠ E ♥ Q 4 620 1.00 2.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
4 ♠ E ♦ K 4 620 1.00 2.00 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
4 ♠ E ♦ K 4 620 1.00 2.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Ciolli-Keplinger
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♠; NS 3N; NS 5♦; NS 3♥; N 4♣; S 3♣; Par +620 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT× N ♣ 10 2 690 3.00 0.00 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Angione-Lagodimos
3 NT N ♠ 9 5 660 2.00 1.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Ciolli-Keplinger
3 NT N ♣ 6 4 630 1.00 2.00 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
3 NT N ♣ 6 −2 200 0.00 3.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♥; EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 2♣; Par −140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♦ 6 −1 50 2.50 0.50 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
3 NT E ♣ 2 −1 50 2.50 0.50 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
1 ♥ W ♠ 6 5 200 1.00 2.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Ciolli-Keplinger
4 ♥ W ♠ 8 5 450 0.00 3.00 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Angione-Lagodimos
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3N; NS 4♦; NS 2♠; NS 2♥; NS 1♣; Par +600 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♥ Q 3 600 3.00 0.00 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Angione-Lagodimos
2 NT S ♣ 4 3 150 2.00 1.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Ciolli-Keplinger
2 ♦ S ♣ 3 4 130 1.00 2.00 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
3 NT S ♣ 4 −3 300 0.00 3.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♥; EW 2♠; EW 1N; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♦ 4 −2 200 3.00 0.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
3 NT W −1 100 2.00 1.00 7-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
2 ♥ W ♠ 10 2 110 1.00 2.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
3 NT W ♦ 4 3 600 0.00 3.00 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 3-Ciolli-Keplinger
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 2♠; EW 3♦; EW 3♣; NS 1♥; Par −100: NS 3♠×−1 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♣ W ♥ 9 −1 50 3.00 0.00 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 3-Ciolli-Keplinger
2 ♣ W ♠ 8 2 90 1.50 1.50 7-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
2 ♣ W ♠ 10 2 90 1.50 1.50 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
3 NT E ♠ 4 3 400 0.00 3.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♣; NS 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♠; EW 1♥; Par +110 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT S ♥ 7 1 90 2.00 1.00 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 3-Ciolli-Keplinger
1 NT S ♥ 7 1 90 2.00 1.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
1 NT S ♥ 7 1 90 2.00 1.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
1 NT S ♥ 7 −1 100 0.00 3.00 7-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♦; EW 2♠; NS 2♥; EW 1N; NS 2♣; Par +130 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ S ♠ A 3 140 3.00 0.00 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
3 ♠ W ♥ 8 −1 100 1.50 1.50 3-Ciolli-Keplinger vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
3 ♠ W ♦ A −1 100 1.50 1.50 7-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
4 ♦ N ♠ J −3 150 0.00 3.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♦; NS 3♣; NS 1N; EW 1♠; Par +130 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♣ S ♥ J 3 110 3.00 0.00 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
1 ♣ S ♦ A 2 90 2.00 1.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
3 ♣ S ♠ Q −1 50 1.00 2.00 3-Ciolli-Keplinger vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
2 NT S ♥ 8 −2 100 0.00 3.00 7-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♥; NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 4♦; N 4♣; S 3♣; Par +620 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♠ 2 4 630 2.50 0.50 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
3 NT S ♣ 5 4 630 2.50 0.50 3-Ciolli-Keplinger vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
4 ♥ S ♣ 8 4 620 1.00 2.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
1 NT N ♠ 2 3 150 0.00 3.00 7-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N 3N; NS 2♠; N 2♥; NS 3♦; S 1N; S 1♥; EW 1♣; Par +400 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♥ 10 4 430 3.00 0.00 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 3-Ciolli-Keplinger
3 NT N ♣ 5 3 400 2.00 1.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
2 ♠ W ♥ 2 −1 100 1.00 2.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Angione-Lagodimos
2 NT N ♣ 6 −1 50 0.00 3.00 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 2N; EW 3♦; NS 1♥; NS 1♣; Par −140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ S ♠ 2 −1 100 3.00 0.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
1 NT W ♥ 4 2 120 2.00 1.00 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
1 NT W ♥ A 3 150 0.50 2.50 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 3-Ciolli-Keplinger
1 NT W ♥ 5 3 150 0.50 2.50 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Angione-Lagodimos
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
W 4♠; E 3♠; W 3♥; EW 4♦; E 2♥; EW 1N; EW 2♣; Par −420 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♠ Q −1 50 3.00 0.00 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 3-Ciolli-Keplinger
1 ♠ W ♣ 2 3 140 2.00 1.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
2 ♠ W ♣ 6 4 170 1.00 2.00 8-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Angione-Lagodimos
3 NT W ♠ 4 4 430 0.00 3.00 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008