HOME | LOCATION | BRIDGESKOOL | CALENDAR | ROSTER | BIDDING | SIGN UP | CONTACT
NEWSLETTER | PHOTOS | RECIPES | CONVENTION CARD | COMMENT | MASTERPOINT RACE


Click --> HAND PRINTOUT to view all hands or RECAP for recap format.

To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!


Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session February 6, 2013
Scores after 5 rounds Average: 25.0 Section E
Pair Pct Score Section Rank Overall Rank MPs
A B C A B C
3 59.00 29.50 B 1 1 1 1 1.52(OA) Cheryl Rankin - Carol Adair
4 53.00 26.50 B 2 2 2 2 1.14(OA) Hiroko Kitamura - Judi Bunch
2 49.00 24.50 C 1 0.37(SC) Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter
5 39.00 19.50 C Jim Ciolli - Darryl Smith
1 35.00 17.50 C Dan Bloch - Richard Keplinger
6 65.00 32.50 A NE NE Kathie Angione - John Lagodimos

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
♠ J 6 5 4
♥ 4
♦ K J 9 8 6 5
♣ K J
♠ A 10 3
♥ J 5 2
♦ 10 7 2
♣ A 6 5 3
N
WE
S
♠ 8 7
♥ A K 9 7 6 3
♦ A 3
♣ 10 7 2
9
9    11
11
♠ K Q 9 2
♥ Q 10 8
♦ Q 4
♣ Q 9 8 4

NS 3♠; EW 2N; EW 2♥; NS 2♦; NS 1♣; Par +100: EW 3N×−1

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 ♠      S  ♥ J      3   140         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
3 ♥      E  ♠ K     −1    50         1.00   1.00 4-Kitamura-Bunch vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
5 ♦×     N  ♥ A     −2         300   0.00   2.00 5-Ciolli-Smith vs 3-Rankin-Adair

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ J 10 8 4
♥ J 6 5
♦ 9 8 6 5
♣ 8 2
♠ A K
♥ K Q 9 7 3 2
♦ 10
♣ Q 7 6 5
N
WE
S
♠ Q 7 3
♥ 10
♦ A K 4 2
♣ A 10 9 4 3
2
14    13
11
♠ 9 6 5 2
♥ A 8 4
♦ Q J 7 3
♣ K J

EW 4N; EW 4♥; EW 5♣; EW 2♠; EW 2♦; Par −430

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 NT     W  ♠ J     −1    50         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
3 NT     E  ♦ 3      4         430   0.50   1.50 4-Kitamura-Bunch vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT     E  ♦ 3      4         430   0.50   1.50 5-Ciolli-Smith vs 3-Rankin-Adair

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 9 4 2
♥ 10 9 8 7 4
♦ J 4
♣ 10 5 3
♠ A 10 7 5 3
♥ A Q J
♦ K
♣ Q 9 6 4
N
WE
S
♠ J 8 6
♥ K 6 3
♦ 9 8 7 6 5
♣ 8 7
1
16    4
19
♠ K Q
♥ 5 2
♦ A Q 10 3 2
♣ A K J 2

EW 2♠; NS 1N; NS 2♦; NS 2♣; NS 1♥; Par −100: NS 2N×−1; NS 3♣×−1; NS 3♦×−1

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
1 ♦×     S  ♠ 7      3   340         2.00   0.00 5-Ciolli-Smith vs 3-Rankin-Adair
3 ♣      S  ♠ 3     −1          50   1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
2 ♦×     S  ♠ A     −2         300   0.00   2.00 4-Kitamura-Bunch vs 2-Hunter-Hunter

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ A Q 9 4 2
♥ Q 10 2
♦ Q J 4
♣ A 2
♠ J 7
♥ K 7 5
♦ 8
♣ K 10 8 7 6 4 3
N
WE
S
♠ K 10 5 3
♥ 6 3
♦ A 10 9 6 5
♣ Q J
15
7    10
8
♠ 8 6
♥ A J 9 8 4
♦ K 7 3 2
♣ 9 5

NS 2♥; EW 3♣; NS 1♠; NS 1♦; Par −110

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
2 ♥      S  ♦ 8      3   140         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
4 ♣      W  ♦ Q     −1   100         1.00   1.00 5-Ciolli-Smith vs 3-Rankin-Adair
3 ♠      N  ♣ Q     −2         200   0.00   2.00 4-Kitamura-Bunch vs 2-Hunter-Hunter

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ J 10
♥ 5 2
♦ A K J 10 9 5
♣ A J 3
♠ K Q 8 7 5 3
♥ 8 3
♦ 4
♣ Q 6 5 2
N
WE
S
♠ —
♥ K J 10 9 4
♦ 8 7 6 3 2
♣ 9 8 7
14
7    4
15
♠ A 9 6 4 2
♥ A Q 7 6
♦ Q
♣ K 10 4

NS 6N; NS 6♦; N 4♠; NS 4♥; S 3♠; N 4♣; S 3♣; Par +1440

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 NT     N  ♥ 9      6   690         1.50   0.50 4-Kitamura-Bunch vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT     S  ♠ 7      6   690         1.50   0.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
3 NT     S  ♥ 8      5   660         0.00   2.00 5-Ciolli-Smith vs 3-Rankin-Adair

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ Q 3
♥ Q 10 8 6 4
♦ A J 6
♣ Q 9 7
♠ A K 10 6 2
♥ J 9
♦ K
♣ K 8 5 4 2
N
WE
S
♠ J 7 5
♥ K 7
♦ 10 7 5 4
♣ A J 6 3
11
14    9
6
♠ 9 8 4
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ Q 9 8 3 2
♣ 10

EW 4♠; EW 5♣; NS 3♥; EW 1N; NS 2♦; Par −300: NS 5♥×−2

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 ♥      N  ♠ 5      3   140         2.00   0.00 1-Bloch-Keplinger vs 5-Ciolli-Smith
4 ♠      W  ♦ 6     −1   100         1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♠      W  ♥ 6      4         170   0.00   2.00 4-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Rankin-Adair

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ A Q 10 8
♥ K 10
♦ Q J 4
♣ J 8 6 5
♠ 4
♥ Q J 9 8 7 5 3
♦ K 7 2
♣ 9 3
N
WE
S
♠ K 9 7
♥ 2
♦ 9 6 3
♣ A K Q 10 7 4
13
6    12
9
♠ J 6 5 3 2
♥ A 6 4
♦ A 10 8 5
♣ 2

NS 4♠; NS 2♦; EW 2♣; EW 1♥; Par +620

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
4 ♠      S  ♥ 8      4   620         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♣      E  ♠ 2     −1   100         1.00   1.00 4-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Rankin-Adair
3 ♥      W  ♣ 4      3         140   0.00   2.00 1-Bloch-Keplinger vs 5-Ciolli-Smith

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
♠ K Q 9 5 2
♥ K 8 7
♦ 8
♣ A 10 7 6
♠ J 3
♥ 10 9 6 5
♦ A 7 6 5 2
♣ 5 4
N
WE
S
♠ A 8
♥ A Q 3
♦ J 9 3
♣ K Q J 9 8
12
5    17
6
♠ 10 7 6 4
♥ J 4 2
♦ K Q 10 4
♣ 3 2

EW 2♦; NS 1♠; EW 1♥; EW 1♣; Par −90

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 ♠      N  ♣ K      3   140         2.00   0.00 4-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Rankin-Adair
3 ♣      E  ♠ 10    −2   100         1.00   1.00 1-Bloch-Keplinger vs 5-Ciolli-Smith
4 ♠      N  ♦ 3     −1          50   0.00   2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Hunter-Hunter

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ K 7
♥ Q J 10 8
♦ K 6
♣ A J 8 7 5
♠ A 8 4
♥ K 3
♦ A Q 10 8 5 4
♣ 10 3
N
WE
S
♠ J 5 2
♥ A 9 5 4 2
♦ J 3 2
♣ K 4
14
13    9
4
♠ Q 10 9 6 3
♥ 7 6
♦ 9 7
♣ Q 9 6 2

EW 3♦; EW 1N; NS 2♣; NS 1♠; EW 1♥; Par −110

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
5 ♦×     W  ♣ A     −2   500         2.00   0.00 1-Bloch-Keplinger vs 5-Ciolli-Smith
3 ♠      S  ♥ 3     −1          50   1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♦      W  ♠ K      3         110   0.00   2.00 4-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Rankin-Adair

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
♠ A 10 9 2
♥ 10 6 5 4
♦ Q 3 2
♣ J 8
♠ K 6 5 3
♥ A K
♦ K 7 4
♣ K 10 3 2
N
WE
S
♠ J 8 4
♥ 9 7 3
♦ A 9 8 6
♣ A 7 6
7
16    9
8
♠ Q 7
♥ Q J 8 2
♦ J 10 5
♣ Q 9 5 4

EW 3♠; EW 2N; EW 3♦; EW 2♣; EW 1♥; Par −140

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 NT     W  ♠ 2     −3   300         2.00   0.00 1-Bloch-Keplinger vs 5-Ciolli-Smith
3 NT     W  ♠ 2     −1   100         1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
1 NT     W  ♠ 2      3         150   0.00   2.00 4-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Rankin-Adair

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
♠ 10 8 4 3
♥ A K 7 3
♦ —
♣ K 10 9 7 3
♠ K 2
♥ 8 5
♦ Q 10 8 7 5
♣ A Q 8 2
N
WE
S
♠ A 9 7 5
♥ Q J 9 4
♦ K 9
♣ J 6 4
10
11    11
8
♠ Q J 6
♥ 10 6 2
♦ A J 6 4 3 2
♣ 5

E 2N; W 1N; W 1♠; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −120

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
2 ♦      W  ♥ A     −1    50         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Rankin-Adair
1 NT     N  ♥ 4     −2         100   1.00   1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
3 ♦      S  ♥ 8     −4         200   0.00   2.00 5-Ciolli-Smith vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠ J 3 2
♥ 8 7 2
♦ 10 6
♣ 10 9 8 4 2
♠ 9 7 5 4
♥ 9
♦ K 9 8 7 5
♣ A 6 3
N
WE
S
♠ A K 8 6
♥ A Q 4
♦ A Q 3 2
♣ J 5
1
7    20
12
♠ Q 10
♥ K J 10 6 5 3
♦ J 4
♣ K Q 7

EW 5♠; EW 4N; EW 5♦; E 2♥; EW 2♣; W 1♥; Par −450

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
6 ♠      E  ♣ K     −1    50         2.00   0.00 5-Ciolli-Smith vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch
3 NT     E  ♣ K      3         400   1.00   1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
4 ♠      E  ♣ K      5         450   0.00   2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Rankin-Adair

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
♠ Q 9 5 2
♥ A K J 10 7 5
♦ K 5
♣ A
♠ 8 3
♥ 9 8 4
♦ J 10 9 3
♣ Q 10 7 2
N
WE
S
♠ J 10 6 4
♥ —
♦ Q 8 7 4
♣ 9 8 6 5 4
17
3    3
17
♠ A K 7
♥ Q 6 3 2
♦ A 6 2
♣ K J 3

NS 7N; NS 7♥; NS 6♠; NS 3♦; NS 1♣; Par +2220

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
7 ♥      N  ♠ 4      7  2210         1.50   0.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
7 ♥      N           7  2210         1.50   0.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Rankin-Adair
5 ♥      N           7   710         0.00   2.00 5-Ciolli-Smith vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
♠ 7 6
♥ A Q J 9 8
♦ 6
♣ K Q 9 7 3
♠ A 10 5 2
♥ 3 2
♦ K 8 5 4 3
♣ 8 6
N
WE
S
♠ Q J 8 3
♥ K 10 6 4
♦ Q 10 9 7
♣ A
12
7    12
9
♠ K 9 4
♥ 7 5
♦ A J 2
♣ J 10 5 4 2

EW 4♠; EW 5♦; NS 3♣; EW 1N; Par −400

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
5 ♦      E  ♥ 7     −1    50         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Rankin-Adair
3 ♦      W  ♥ A      4         130   1.00   1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
3 ♠      W  ♦ 6      4         170   0.00   2.00 5-Ciolli-Smith vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠ K 10 9 7 3
♥ 8 7 3
♦ 2
♣ Q 10 4 2
♠ 6
♥ A 9 6 4
♦ A Q 8 4
♣ K J 9 6
N
WE
S
♠ A 4
♥ Q 10 5
♦ K J 10 9 3
♣ 8 7 5
5
14    10
11
♠ Q J 8 5 2
♥ K J 2
♦ 7 6 5
♣ A 3

EW 5♦; EW 3♥; EW 2N; NS 2♠; EW 3♣; Par −400

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
4 ♦      E          −1    50         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Rankin-Adair
2 ♦      W  ♠ K      3         110   1.00   1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
3 NT     W  ♣ 2      3         400   0.00   2.00 5-Ciolli-Smith vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠ A Q 6
♥ K Q 9
♦ Q 8 6 3 2
♣ K 3
♠ J 8
♥ 10 5 3
♦ A K 7
♣ A 9 8 5 2
N
WE
S
♠ 7 5 3 2
♥ 2
♦ 9 5 4
♣ Q J 10 7 6
16
12    3
9
♠ K 10 9 4
♥ A J 8 7 6 4
♦ J 10
♣ 4

NS 4N; NS 4♠; NS 4♥; NS 2♦; EW 2♣; Par +430

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
4 ♥      N  ♣ Q      5   450         1.50   0.50 3-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
4 ♥      S  ♦ K      5   450         1.50   0.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch
2 ♥      S  ♦ A      4   170         0.00   2.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Smith

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
♠ 10 3
♥ J 9 8 7 2
♦ A J 3
♣ 5 4 3
♠ A 5
♥ 5 3
♦ K Q 10 8 5
♣ K J 10 6
N
WE
S
♠ 9 8 7 6 2
♥ A K Q
♦ 7 6 4
♣ 8 2
6
13    9
12
♠ K Q J 4
♥ 10 6 4
♦ 9 2
♣ A Q 9 7

W 4♦; W 2♠; E 3♦; EW 1N; EW 2♣; E 1♠; Par −130

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
1 NT     N  ♠ 6     −1          50   2.00   0.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
3 ♥      N  ♦ 7     −2         100   1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch
1 NT     W           2         120   0.00   2.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Smith

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ K J 2
♥ J 7 6
♦ Q J 7 6 4
♣ 10 3
♠ A 8 6 4
♥ 9 8 3
♦ 5 3 2
♣ K 5 4
N
WE
S
♠ 10 9 3
♥ 5 2
♦ A K 10 9 8
♣ A Q 8
8
7    13
12
♠ Q 7 5
♥ A K Q 10 4
♦ —
♣ J 9 7 6 2

NS 3♥; EW 1N; N 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1♦; S 1♣; Par +140

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
4 ♥      S  ♦ 3      4   620         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch
3 ♠      W  ♥ J     −4   200         1.00   1.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
2 ♠      W  ♥ J     −2   100         0.00   2.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Smith

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 8 7 6 3
♥ 5 4
♦ A 6
♣ A K Q J 4
♠ A
♥ A K 9
♦ Q 7 4 2
♣ 9 8 6 5 2
N
WE
S
♠ K Q J 10 5 4
♥ 10 8 7 6 3
♦ K
♣ 10
14
13    9
4
♠ 9 2
♥ Q J 2
♦ J 10 9 8 5 3
♣ 7 3

EW 4♠; EW 4♥; S 2N; NS 3♦; N 1N; S 2♣; N 1♣; Par −300: S 4N×−2; NS 5♦×−2

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
4 ♦      S  ♠ A     −1          50   2.00   0.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
2 ♠      E  ♣ 7      3         140   1.00   1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Smith
5 ♦×     S  ♥ K     −2         300   0.00   2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ A J 10 6
♥ A K J 10 7
♦ Q 10
♣ 8 3
♠ K 3
♥ Q 9 8 3
♦ A 5
♣ K Q 6 5 2
N
WE
S
♠ Q 9 8 2
♥ 6 4
♦ J 4 3
♣ A 9 7 4
15
14    7
4
♠ 7 5 4
♥ 5 2
♦ K 9 8 7 6 2
♣ J 10

W 2N; EW 3♣; E 1N; NS 2♦; NS 1♥; Par −120

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
2 NT     E  ♦ 7     −1   100         2.00   0.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Bloch-Keplinger
1 NT     W  ♥ J      1          90   1.00   1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Smith
3 ♣      W  ♥ A      4         130   0.00   2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ A 8 7 6 5 3
♥ J 2
♦ Q 10 3 2
♣ 6
♠ K J 4 2
♥ K 10 6 3
♦ 8 7 5
♣ Q 8
N
WE
S
♠ —
♥ A Q 7
♦ A J 6 4
♣ A 10 9 7 5 3
7
9    15
9
♠ Q 10 9
♥ 9 8 5 4
♦ K 9
♣ K J 4 2

E 3♥; E 4♣; EW 2N; N 2♠; W 2♥; W 3♣; EW 2♦; S 1♠; Par −140

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
4 ♥      W  ♣ 6     −3   150         2.00   0.00 1-Bloch-Keplinger vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch
4 ♥      W  ♣ 6     −2   100         1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Ciolli-Smith
3 ♣      E  ♠ 9      3         110   0.00   2.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Hunter-Hunter

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ A Q J 7
♥ K Q 9 4
♦ 3
♣ A K 6 2
♠ K 4
♥ A 8 7 2
♦ A K 5 2
♣ 10 9 5
N
WE
S
♠ 8 5 2
♥ J 10 5
♦ J 9 8 6 4
♣ J 7
19
14    3
4
♠ 10 9 6 3
♥ 6 3
♦ Q 10 7
♣ Q 8 4 3

NS 5♠; NS 3N; NS 5♣; NS 2♥; S 1♦; Par +450

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 ♦×     W  ♣ A     −1   200         1.50   0.50 3-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠      S  ♦ A      5   200         1.50   0.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Ciolli-Smith
1 ♦      W  ♣ A      3         110   0.00   2.00 1-Bloch-Keplinger vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ 8 6
♥ K J 9 6 3 2
♦ 7 3
♣ A 6 3
♠ A 9 7 3
♥ Q 5 4
♦ K Q 4
♣ Q 10 2
N
WE
S
♠ J 5
♥ A 8 7
♦ J 9 2
♣ J 9 8 7 4
8
13    7
12
♠ K Q 10 4 2
♥ 10
♦ A 10 8 6 5
♣ K 5

NS 2♠; NS 2♥; NS 2♦; EW 1♣; Par +110

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 NT     S  ♠ 3      4   630         2.00   0.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠      S  ♣ 2      3   140         1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Ciolli-Smith
3 NT     N  ♣ 9     −4         400   0.00   2.00 1-Bloch-Keplinger vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
♠ A J 3 2
♥ Q 10 7 3
♦ J 10
♣ Q 8 2
♠ 7 6 4
♥ K 8 4 2
♦ 8 7 4
♣ A 7 4
N
WE
S
♠ K
♥ A 9 5
♦ A K 9 5 3
♣ J 10 9 5
10
7    15
8
♠ Q 10 9 8 5
♥ J 6
♦ Q 6 2
♣ K 6 3

E 2♥; EW 3♦; EW 1N; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; W 1♥; Par −110

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
1 NT     E  ♠ 8     −1    50         1.50   0.50 3-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♦      E  ♠ 9     −1    50         1.50   0.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Ciolli-Smith
2 ♥      W  ♦ J      3         140   0.00   2.00 1-Bloch-Keplinger vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ A 6 2
♥ K 7 6
♦ 10 8 2
♣ K 7 6 3
♠ 9 7 5 3
♥ 4 3
♦ K 9 5 3
♣ A 5 4
N
WE
S
♠ Q J 10 8 4
♥ J 10 5
♦ A Q J 7
♣ Q
10
7    13
10
♠ K
♥ A Q 9 8 2
♦ 6 4
♣ J 10 9 8 2

EW 3♠; NS 4♣; NS 2N; NS 2♥; EW 2♦; Par +130

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
5 ♥      N  ♠ Q      5   450         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Ciolli-Smith
2 ♠      E  ♣ J      2         110   1.00   1.00 1-Bloch-Keplinger vs 4-Kitamura-Bunch
3 ♠      E  ♣ J      4         170   0.00   2.00 3-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Hunter-Hunter

Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008 web counter