To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session February 13, 2013
Scores after 5 rounds Average: 25.0 Section E
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
1 64.00 32.00 B 1 1 0.60(A) Dan Bloch - Judi Bunch
2 59.00 29.50 B 2 2 0.42(A) Cheryl Rankin - Carol Adair
3 42.00 21.00 C Vickie Palmer - Darrel Palmer
5 40.00 20.00 C Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter
4 35.00 17.50 B Richard Keplinger - Rita Schmitt
6 60.00 30.00 A NE Kathie Angione - John Lagodimos
Board 1 North Deals None Vul
♠
9 8 7 5 4 3
♥
4 3
♦
6
♣
10 8 3 2
♠
Q 10
♥
A Q 6
♦
J 10 9 3
♣
K Q 6 5
N
W
E
S
♠
A 2
♥
9 8 5 2
♦
A K 8 2
♣
J 9 4
0 14 12 14
♠
K J 6
♥
K J 10 7
♦
Q 7 5 4
♣
A 7
E 3N; E 3♥; E 4♦; W 2♥; W 3♦; E 3♣; W 1N; W 2♣; NS 1♠; Par −400
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ E ♣ A −1 50 2.00 0.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
2 NT S ♦ J −2 100 1.00 1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
2 ♣ W ♦ 6 3 110 0.00 2.00 4-Keplinger-Schmitt vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
J 7 5 3
♥
A Q 6 2
♦
A 4 2
♣
K 2
♠
K 9 8
♥
8 4
♦
9 7 5 3
♣
A 9 8 6
N
W
E
S
♠
A 10 6
♥
K 5 3
♦
K J 8
♣
Q 7 5 3
14 7 13 6
♠
Q 4 2
♥
J 10 9 7
♦
Q 10 6
♣
J 10 4
EW 3♣; EW 1N; EW 2♦; NS 1♥; Par −110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT W ♥ 6 −3 150 2.00 0.00 4-Keplinger-Schmitt vs 2-Rankin-Adair
2 ♥ S ♣ A 2 110 1.00 1.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
2 ♥ S ♣ A −2 200 0.00 2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
10 9 5
♥
Q J 10 8 5 3
♦
Q J 4
♣
Q
♠
J 6 3
♥
A 7
♦
A K 10 9
♣
10 9 4 3
N
W
E
S
♠
A Q 8
♥
6 2
♦
8 7 6 5
♣
K 8 6 5
8 12 9 11
♠
K 7 4 2
♥
K 9 4
♦
3 2
♣
A J 7 2
NS 2♥; NS 1N; EW 2♦; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; Par +110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ N ♦ 8 3 140 1.50 0.50 4-Keplinger-Schmitt vs 2-Rankin-Adair
2 ♥ N ♣ 5 3 140 1.50 0.50 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
Pass Pass 0.00 2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul
♠
8
♥
A Q J 10 5
♦
10 6 3
♣
A K 8 6
♠
A K 10 7 4
♥
8 3
♦
8
♣
Q J 10 9 2
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 9 6 2
♥
K 9 7 4
♦
K Q J
♣
7 5
14 10 11 5
♠
J 5 3
♥
6 2
♦
A 9 7 5 4 2
♣
4 3
EW 3♠; NS 1♥; NS 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♦ S ♠ A −2 200 2.00 0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
3 ♣ N ♥ K −4 400 1.00 1.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
4 ♠ W ♠ 8 4 620 0.00 2.00 4-Keplinger-Schmitt vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
Q
♥
Q 10 8 6 4 2
♦
A K J 5 3
♣
7
♠
A J 3
♥
J 7 3
♦
8 7 2
♣
K Q 6 4
N
W
E
S
♠
9 8 7 6 5
♥
A 9
♦
10 9 4
♣
8 5 3
12 11 4 13
♠
K 10 4 2
♥
K 5
♦
Q 6
♣
A J 10 9 2
NS 5♥; S 4N; N 3N; NS 5♦; NS 2♣; NS 1♠; Par +650
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♥ S ♠ 5 5 650 2.00 0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
3 NT N ♣ 4 4 630 1.00 1.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
3 NT N ♦ 2 −1 100 0.00 2.00 4-Keplinger-Schmitt vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
Q 7 3
♥
9 7 6 4
♦
A 10 7 3
♣
8 4
♠
6 2
♥
Q J 8
♦
8 4
♣
A J 9 6 3 2
N
W
E
S
♠
A K 10
♥
A K 10 5
♦
K J 6 5
♣
Q 7
6 8 20 6
♠
J 9 8 5 4
♥
3 2
♦
Q 9 2
♣
K 10 5
EW 6N; EW 6♥; EW 6♣; E 3♠; EW 4♦; W 2♠; Par −1440
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 ♦ E ♥ 3 −3 300 2.00 0.00 1-Bloch-Bunch vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT E ♠ 5 4 630 1.00 1.00 4-Keplinger-Schmitt vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
3 NT W ♠ 5 5 660 0.00 2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul
♠
A K 7
♥
A 7 4 2
♦
Q 6
♣
J 10 6 3
♠
Q 10 9 6 5
♥
Q 3
♦
K 8
♣
K 9 7 4
N
W
E
S
♠
8 3 2
♥
10
♦
A 10 9 7 4 3
♣
A Q 8
14 10 10 6
♠
J 4
♥
K J 9 8 6 5
♦
J 5 2
♣
5 2
EW 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 2N; EW 3♦; EW 2♣; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ S ♠ Q 4 620 2.00 0.00 1-Bloch-Bunch vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♥ S ♠ 5 3 140 0.50 1.50 4-Keplinger-Schmitt vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
3 ♥ S ♦ K 3 140 0.50 1.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 8 West Deals None Vul
♠
A K
♥
Q 7 6 4 3
♦
K 7 6
♣
K 8 6
♠
J 10 6
♥
K
♦
Q J 9 8 3 2
♣
A 10 2
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 9 8 4 3 2
♥
2
♦
A 10 5 4
♣
9 3
15 11 6 8
♠
7 5
♥
A J 10 9 8 5
♦
—
♣
Q J 7 5 4
NS 6♥; NS 6♣; EW 2♠; EW 3♦; Par +800: EW 6♠×−4; EW 7♦×−4
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♦ A 6 480 1.50 0.50 1-Bloch-Bunch vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ N ♦ A 6 480 1.50 0.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Rankin-Adair
4 ♥ N ♠ 4 5 450 0.00 2.00 4-Keplinger-Schmitt vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
K
♥
10 5 3
♦
Q 9 8 7 5
♣
10 7 5 2
♠
Q J 10 8 6 3
♥
9 4
♦
3
♣
K 8 6 4
N
W
E
S
♠
9 4 2
♥
K 6 2
♦
A K 6 4 2
♣
A Q
5 6 16 13
♠
A 7 5
♥
A Q J 8 7
♦
J 10
♣
J 9 3
EW 3♠; NS 2♥; NS 1N; NS 2♦; NS 1♣; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♥ A −4 400 2.00 0.00 1-Bloch-Bunch vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ W ♦ J −1 100 1.00 1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Rankin-Adair
3 ♠ E ♦ J 3 140 0.00 2.00 4-Keplinger-Schmitt vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul
♠
K 3
♥
J 8 4
♦
A 10 8 5 2
♣
A 10 5
♠
A 10 8 7 2
♥
K 10 6 2
♦
J 7
♣
7 3
N
W
E
S
♠
J 6
♥
A Q 5
♦
6 4 3
♣
K Q 9 8 2
12 8 12 8
♠
Q 9 5 4
♥
9 7 3
♦
K Q 9
♣
J 6 4
EW 3♥; EW 2♠; N 1N; NS 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ N ♠ J 3 110 2.00 0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Rankin-Adair
2 ♦ N ♠ J 2 90 1.00 1.00 1-Bloch-Bunch vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♦ N ♥ 5 −1 100 0.00 2.00 4-Keplinger-Schmitt vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
Board 11 South Deals None Vul
♠
A 10 5 2
♥
10 5
♦
Q 9 8 6 4
♣
K 8
♠
8 4
♥
A 6 3
♦
A K 3
♣
7 6 4 3 2
N
W
E
S
♠
Q J 3
♥
K Q 7 4 2
♦
2
♣
A Q 10 9
9 11 14 6
♠
K 9 7 6
♥
J 9 8
♦
J 10 7 5
♣
J 5
EW 5N; EW 5♥; EW 5♣; EW 1♠; EW 1♦; Par −460
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ N ♥ A 2 110 2.00 0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
2 ♥ E ♣ J 5 200 1.00 1.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
1 ♥ E ♣ J 6 230 0.00 2.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul
♠
J 5 4 3
♥
K 8 6 5
♦
8 5 2
♣
K 10
♠
Q 10 9 7
♥
A Q 9 7
♦
9 4
♣
A 9 3
N
W
E
S
♠
2
♥
J 10 4 2
♦
K Q J 3
♣
J 8 7 6
7 12 8 13
♠
A K 8 6
♥
3
♦
A 10 7 6
♣
Q 5 4 2
NS 2♠; EW 2♥; EW 1N; NS 1♦; EW 1♣; Par +100: EW 2N×−1; EW 3♥×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ E ♠ A −2 100 2.00 0.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
3 NT W ♣ 10 −1 50 1.00 1.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
2 ♠ N −1 100 0.00 2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul
♠
A 9 8
♥
Q 7
♦
K 10 6
♣
10 9 8 7 6
♠
K J 10 6
♥
K 3 2
♦
Q J 9
♣
K 5 3
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 7 5 4
♥
A J 9 5
♦
A 7
♣
Q J 4
9 13 14 4
♠
3 2
♥
10 8 6 4
♦
8 5 4 3 2
♣
A 2
EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 4♥; EW 2♣; EW 1♦; Par −630
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ E ♣ 10 4 620 2.00 0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
3 NT W ♣ 10 4 630 0.50 1.50 2-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
3 NT W ♣ 10 4 630 0.50 1.50 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
Board 14 East Deals None Vul
♠
J 8 4 3
♥
A J 6
♦
Q 5 2
♣
A Q 3
♠
A K Q
♥
Q 10 9 8 2
♦
A 10 6
♣
9 5
N
W
E
S
♠
10 6 5 2
♥
3
♦
J 8 7 3
♣
K 7 4 2
14 15 4 7
♠
9 7
♥
K 7 5 4
♦
K 9 4
♣
J 10 8 6
S 2N; N 1N; EW 1♠; S 1♥; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +120
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ W ♣ A −1 50 2.00 0.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
3 ♣ S ♠ A −2 100 1.00 1.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
1 ♥ E 2 110 0.00 2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul
♠
A 6 3
♥
A K 9 6 5
♦
8 7
♣
K 5 4
♠
8
♥
J 10 7 3 2
♦
K 10 6 4
♣
A 9 8
N
W
E
S
♠
J 5 4 2
♥
Q
♦
9 5 2
♣
Q J 10 6 3
14 8 6 12
♠
K Q 10 9 7
♥
8 4
♦
A Q J 3
♣
7 2
NS 5♠; NS 4N; NS 2♥; NS 3♦; Par +650
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ S ♥ J 4 620 1.50 0.50 2-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
4 ♠ N ♥ 2 4 620 1.50 0.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
4 ♠ S ♥ 2 −1 100 0.00 2.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul
♠
J 6 3
♥
9 7 6
♦
A Q J 9 5
♣
Q 4
♠
A 10 9 5
♥
10 3
♦
10 4
♣
A J 9 5 2
N
W
E
S
♠
8 7 4 2
♥
K Q 8 5
♦
7
♣
K 10 7 3
10 9 8 13
♠
K Q
♥
A J 4 2
♦
K 8 6 3 2
♣
8 6
EW 3♠; NS 2♥; NS 3♦; EW 3♣; Par −100: NS 4♦×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT N ♥ 5 2 120 2.00 0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
3 ♦ S ♣ A 3 110 1.00 1.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♦ S ♥ 10 −3 150 0.00 2.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
Board 17 North Deals None Vul
♠
A Q 9
♥
Q 7
♦
A K Q 10 8
♣
9 6 4
♠
K J 6 5 4
♥
J 8 3
♦
4
♣
K J 10 5
N
W
E
S
♠
8 3 2
♥
A K 9 2
♦
J 9 3
♣
A Q 2
17 9 14 0
♠
10 7
♥
10 6 5 4
♦
7 6 5 2
♣
8 7 3
EW 3♠; EW 2♥; EW 2♣; NS 1♦; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT N ♥ A 1 90 2.00 0.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠ E ♦ A −1 50 1.00 1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
3 ♥ E ♦ 2 3 140 0.00 2.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
7 6 5 4
♥
A K Q 7
♦
A 7 6
♣
A J
♠
10 8
♥
9 6 5 3
♦
10 9 5 2
♣
K 10 3
N
W
E
S
♠
9 2
♥
10 8 4 2
♦
K Q
♣
9 8 5 4 2
18 3 5 14
♠
A K Q J 3
♥
J
♦
J 8 4 3
♣
Q 7 6
NS 7♠; NS 6N; NS 6♥; NS 5♦; NS 4♣; Par +2210
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 ♠ S ♣ 3 7 1460 1.50 0.50 2-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
6 ♠ N ♠ 8 7 1460 1.50 0.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
6 ♠ S ♥ 3 6 1430 0.00 2.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
7
♥
A J 9 7 3 2
♦
A 6
♣
A 10 4 2
♠
Q 8 6 3 2
♥
6
♦
K 10 8 7 4 3
♣
8
N
W
E
S
♠
K J 5 4
♥
K Q 10 5
♦
Q 9 5
♣
Q 3
13 5 13 9
♠
A 10 9
♥
8 4
♦
J 2
♣
K J 9 7 6 5
NS 3N; NS 5♣; EW 3♠; NS 3♥; EW 2♦; Par +400
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♦× E ♠ 7 −2 500 2.00 0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
5 ♣ S ♥ 6 5 400 1.00 1.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♥ N ♠ J 4 170 0.00 2.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul
♠
J 6 5
♥
5
♦
A Q 10 6 5
♣
K 6 5 4
♠
A Q 10 2
♥
K J 8 6
♦
9 3
♣
J 7 2
N
W
E
S
♠
4
♥
A Q 9 4
♦
K J 8 4
♣
A Q 10 8
10 11 16 3
♠
K 9 8 7 3
♥
10 7 3 2
♦
7 2
♣
9 3
EW 6N; EW 6♥; EW 5♣; EW 3♠; EW 4♦; Par −1440
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♠ 5 4 620 2.00 0.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Bloch-Bunch
4 ♥ E ♠ 5 5 650 1.00 1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
4 ♥ W ♦ A 6 680 0.00 2.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
A 8
♥
Q J 10 6 4
♦
—
♣
J 10 9 7 4 2
♠
9 3
♥
A K 9 7 5
♦
8 7 6
♣
A 5 3
N
W
E
S
♠
K J 10 6 5 4 2
♥
2
♦
J 9 5 2
♣
Q
8 11 7 14
♠
Q 7
♥
8 3
♦
A K Q 10 4 3
♣
K 8 6
NS 3N; W 3♠; E 2♠; NS 2♥; NS 3♣; NS 2♦; Par +100: W 4♠×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ E ♦ A −2 100 2.00 0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠ E ♦ A −1 50 1.00 1.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Rankin-Adair
3 ♠ E ♦ A 3 140 0.00 2.00 1-Bloch-Bunch vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
J 5 4 3
♥
10
♦
9 7 4
♣
K 5 4 3 2
♠
A K 9
♥
A Q 9 8 5 4
♦
5 2
♣
9 6
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 7 2
♥
K 7 6 3
♦
A Q J
♣
Q J 10
4 13 15 8
♠
10 8 6
♥
J 2
♦
K 10 8 6 3
♣
A 8 7
EW 4N; EW 4♥; EW 2♠; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −630
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 ♥ E ♣ A −1 100 1.50 0.50 1-Bloch-Bunch vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
5 ♥ W ♠ 3 −1 100 1.50 0.50 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Rankin-Adair
4 ♥ W ♠ 3 4 620 0.00 2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul
♠
K 10 6 5
♥
Q J 10 8
♦
J 9 2
♣
K Q
♠
9 3
♥
A K 9 4
♦
K 7 3
♣
J 8 6 3
N
W
E
S
♠
A 2
♥
6 5 2
♦
A 10 8 4
♣
9 5 4 2
12 11 8 9
♠
Q J 8 7 4
♥
7 3
♦
Q 6 5
♣
A 10 7
NS 2♠; NS 1N; NS 1♥; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par +110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠ S ♥ K 3 140 2.00 0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
1 ♠ S ♥ A 2 110 1.00 1.00 1-Bloch-Bunch vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
2 ♣ W ♥ Q 2 90 0.00 2.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 24 West Deals None Vul
♠
A 9 3
♥
K Q J 5 2
♦
A Q 3
♣
K Q
♠
Q J 10
♥
10 6
♦
J 9 8
♣
J 10 7 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K 6 2
♥
9 8 7 4 3
♦
5 4
♣
9 8 5
21 5 3 11
♠
8 7 5 4
♥
A
♦
K 10 7 6 2
♣
A 6 3
NS 7N; NS 7♦; NS 5♠; NS 5♥; NS 3♣; Par +1520
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 NT N ♥ 3 7 1020 2.00 0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT N ♥ 9 4 430 1.00 1.00 1-Bloch-Bunch vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
5 ♦ S ♠ A 5 400 0.00 2.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
Q 10 6 5 4 3
♥
3
♦
Q 9 8 7 2
♣
K
♠
8
♥
A K J 9 5 2
♦
K J 6 4
♣
10 6
N
W
E
S
♠
J 9 7 2
♥
Q 10 8 7
♦
5
♣
Q 9 8 2
7 12 5 16
♠
A K
♥
6 4
♦
A 10 3
♣
A J 7 5 4 3
NS 4♠; EW 3♥; NS 3♦; EW 1N; NS 2♣; Par +420
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♥× W ♣ K −2 500 2.00 0.00 1-Bloch-Bunch vs 4-Keplinger-Schmitt
4 ♣ S ♥ A −2 100 1.00 1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ W ♣ K 3 140 0.00 2.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008
