To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session April 3, 2013
Scores after 5 rounds Average: 25.0 Section E
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
6 60.00 30.00 B 1 1 0.60(A) Linda Dusharme - John Dusharme
2 58.00 29.00 B 2 2 0.42(A) Donna Rafenstein - Carol Adair
4 50.00 25.00 B Gary Piazzoni - Liz Piazzoni
1 49.00 24.50 A John Lagodimos - Jim Ciolli
3 45.00 22.50 C Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter
5 38.00 19.00 B Judi Bunch - Hiroko Kitamura
Board 1 North Deals None Vul
♠
K 3
♥
J 8 6 4
♦
A 6 2
♣
A 5 4 3
♠
A J 9
♥
A K Q 10 7
♦
J 7 5
♣
K 2
N
W
E
S
♠
10 2
♥
3
♦
K 10 9 8 4 3
♣
Q J 9 6
12 18 6 4
♠
Q 8 7 6 5 4
♥
9 5 2
♦
Q
♣
10 8 7
EW 4N; EW 5♦; EW 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1♥; Par −430
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ S ♥ K −1 50 2.00 0.00 5-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠ S ♥ A −2 100 1.00 1.00 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
2 ♥ W ♠ K 2 110 0.00 2.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
6 4
♥
9 8 7 6 2
♦
10 7 4
♣
Q 8 7
♠
A K 9 8 2
♥
A K J
♦
K J
♣
J 6 4
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 10
♥
Q 5 4 3
♦
A 5
♣
10 9 5 3 2
2 20 8 10
♠
J 7 5 3
♥
10
♦
Q 9 8 6 3 2
♣
A K
EW 5N; EW 5♠; EW 3♥; EW 4♣; Par −460
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♥ 9 3 400 1.50 0.50 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
3 NT E ♦ 6 3 400 1.50 0.50 5-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT E ♣ K 4 430 0.00 2.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
A 9 7 5
♥
10 5 3
♦
9 6 3
♣
Q 5 2
♠
J 6 4 3
♥
Q 9
♦
A K Q J 4
♣
K 6
N
W
E
S
♠
K 10 8
♥
J 8
♦
8 7 2
♣
A J 10 9 3
6 16 9 9
♠
Q 2
♥
A K 7 6 4 2
♦
10 5
♣
8 7 4
EW 3♠; EW 4♦; EW 4♣; NS 1♥; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ W ♥ 3 −2 200 2.00 0.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
3 ♦ W ♥ 3 −1 100 1.00 1.00 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
3 ♦ W ♥ 10 4 130 0.00 2.00 5-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul
♠
8 7
♥
A 8 4
♦
10 9 7
♣
A K J 4 3
♠
A Q 5 4
♥
K Q J 7 3
♦
A
♣
9 5 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K J 10 9 6
♥
10 9 6
♦
K 8 3
♣
7 6
12 16 7 5
♠
3 2
♥
5 2
♦
Q J 6 5 4 2
♣
Q 10 8
EW 4♠; EW 4♥; EW 1N; NS 2♦; NS 1♣; Par −620
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♣ E ♣ A 4 130 2.00 0.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
3 ♠ E ♥ 5 6 230 1.00 1.00 5-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ W ♣ A 4 620 0.00 2.00 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
7 6
♥
A Q 10 7
♦
10 5 4
♣
J 10 8 3
♠
K J 9
♥
6 5 2
♦
A K J 3
♣
A 9 7
N
W
E
S
♠
10 5 4
♥
K 8 4
♦
9 8 7 6
♣
K 6 5
7 16 6 11
♠
A Q 8 3 2
♥
J 9 3
♦
Q 2
♣
Q 4 2
EW 3N; EW 3♦; EW 1♠; EW 1♣; Par −400
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT W ♥ 7 3 150 1.50 0.50 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
1 NT W ♠ 7 3 150 1.50 0.50 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
1 NT N ♦ 9 −3 300 0.00 2.00 5-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
10 6 4
♥
7 5 2
♦
Q 10 6 5
♣
K 10 2
♠
K J 7
♥
10 4
♦
A K J 8 7
♣
8 6 3
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 8 5 3 2
♥
K J 8 6
♦
9 4 2
♣
9
5 12 6 17
♠
A 9
♥
A Q 9 3
♦
3
♣
A Q J 7 5 4
NS 3N; NS 3♥; NS 4♣; EW 2♠; EW 1♦; Par +400
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦× W ♣ 2 −2 500 2.00 0.00 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♣ S ♦ A 5 150 1.00 1.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
3 ♣ S ♦ K 3 110 0.00 2.00 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul
♠
A 2
♥
K 10 6
♦
10 7 5 3
♣
J 8 7 2
♠
10 9 5
♥
9 8 7 5 3
♦
A 9 4
♣
9 5
N
W
E
S
♠
K 8 7 6 4
♥
A 4 2
♦
Q 6 2
♣
A 6
8 4 13 15
♠
Q J 3
♥
Q J
♦
K J 8
♣
K Q 10 4 3
N 3♦; NS 3♣; NS 1N; S 2♦; EW 1♠; EW 1♥; Par +110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT N ♠ 4 2 120 1.50 0.50 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
2 NT S ♥ 3 2 120 1.50 0.50 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
3 NT S ♠ 6 −1 100 0.00 2.00 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 8 West Deals None Vul
♠
K 8 7 4
♥
6 4 3
♦
Q 3
♣
6 5 3 2
♠
9 2
♥
J 7 2
♦
K 7 5 4
♣
J 9 8 7
N
W
E
S
♠
Q J 10 6
♥
K Q 8 5
♦
J 8 2
♣
A 4
5 5 13 17
♠
A 5 3
♥
A 10 9
♦
A 10 9 6
♣
K Q 10
NS 2N; NS 2♣; NS 1♠; EW 1♥; NS 1♦; Par +120
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT S ♣ 7 2 120 2.00 0.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
1 NT S ♦ 4 1 90 0.50 1.50 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
1 NT S ♦ K 1 90 0.50 1.50 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
7 6 5 4
♥
4 3
♦
A 10 6
♣
A 10 9 5
♠
Q
♥
Q 8 2
♦
8 5 3 2
♣
K Q J 6 4
N
W
E
S
♠
10 8 2
♥
A J 10 9
♦
Q 7 4
♣
8 7 3
8 10 7 15
♠
A K J 9 3
♥
K 7 6 5
♦
K J 9
♣
2
NS 6♠; NS 4N; NS 2♥; NS 3♦; NS 2♣; Par +980
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ S ♣ K 4 420 2.00 0.00 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♠ S ♠ 2 4 170 0.50 1.50 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
2 ♠ S ♣ K 4 170 0.50 1.50 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul
♠
10 2
♥
A 6 5 3
♦
A K 6 5 2
♣
6 2
♠
K Q J 8 6 3
♥
Q 2
♦
3
♣
K 8 4 3
N
W
E
S
♠
9 5
♥
K J 7 4
♦
J 10 9 4
♣
A J 5
11 11 10 8
♠
A 7 4
♥
10 9 8
♦
Q 8 7
♣
Q 10 9 7
EW 3♠; EW 1N; EW 2♣; E 1♥; NS 1♦; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ W 3 140 1.50 0.50 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♠ W ♦ A 3 140 1.50 0.50 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠ W ♦ A 4 170 0.00 2.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
Board 11 South Deals None Vul
♠
A Q 3 2
♥
Q 8 5
♦
9
♣
10 9 7 6 4
♠
9 7 5
♥
J 9
♦
K J 5 2
♣
A K 8 2
N
W
E
S
♠
4
♥
A 10 7 6 4 2
♦
Q 6 4 3
♣
Q 3
8 12 8 12
♠
K J 10 8 6
♥
K 3
♦
A 10 8 7
♣
J 5
NS 3♠; EW 2♥; EW 3♦; NS 1N; NS 1♣; Par +100: EW 4♦×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ S ♣ A 4 170 2.00 0.00 2-Rafenstein-Adair vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
2 ♠ S ♥ J 3 140 1.00 1.00 5-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♠ S ♣ K −1 50 0.00 2.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul
♠
9 7
♥
K 6 4 2
♦
J
♣
K J 8 7 5 2
♠
10 8 5 3
♥
J 10
♦
A 8 6 2
♣
A 10 3
N
W
E
S
♠
A K Q J
♥
9 3
♦
10 9 4
♣
Q 9 6 4
8 9 12 11
♠
6 4 2
♥
A Q 8 7 5
♦
K Q 7 5 3
♣
—
NS 4♥; EW 1♠; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +500: EW 4♠×−3
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ S ♠ 3 4 620 2.00 0.00 2-Rafenstein-Adair vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
3 ♥ N ♠ A 4 170 1.00 1.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ S ♥ J −1 100 0.00 2.00 5-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul
♠
A 8 7
♥
10 9 3
♦
6 2
♣
A 9 8 5 3
♠
10 5 4
♥
5 4 2
♦
K Q 9 8
♣
10 7 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K Q J 3
♥
Q 6
♦
A J 7 4
♣
K Q 4
8 5 18 9
♠
9 6 2
♥
A K J 8 7
♦
10 5 3
♣
J 6
EW 2♠; NS 2♥; EW 3♦; NS 1N; NS 1♣; Par −110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT E ♥ 8 1 90 2.00 0.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♦ E ♥ A 3 110 0.50 1.50 2-Rafenstein-Adair vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
3 ♦ W ♥ 10 3 110 0.50 1.50 5-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
Board 14 East Deals None Vul
♠
K Q 9 8
♥
A 10 8
♦
A 10 7 3
♣
K 10
♠
A 10
♥
J 9 6 5 4 2
♦
K Q 8 2
♣
6
N
W
E
S
♠
J 7 5 3
♥
K 3
♦
9 5
♣
A J 8 5 3
16 10 9 5
♠
6 4 2
♥
Q 7
♦
J 6 4
♣
Q 9 7 4 2
EW 2♥; NS 2♣; W 1♠; NS 1♦; Par −100: NS 3♣×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ E ♣ 5 −2 100 2.00 0.00 2-Rafenstein-Adair vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
1 NT N ♣ 5 −1 50 0.50 1.50 5-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
2 ♠ S ♣ 6 −1 50 0.50 1.50 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul
♠
A 5
♥
J 10 8
♦
K Q 9
♣
9 8 7 6 3
♠
10 9
♥
Q 9 5
♦
A 10 4 3
♣
Q J 10 5
N
W
E
S
♠
K J 8 6 3 2
♥
6
♦
J 8 2
♣
A 4 2
10 9 9 12
♠
Q 7 4
♥
A K 7 4 3 2
♦
7 6 5
♣
K
NS 3♥; EW 1N; EW 1♠; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par +140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ S ♠ 10 4 620 2.00 0.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠× W ♥ A −3 500 1.00 1.00 2-Rafenstein-Adair vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
3 ♥ S ♠ 10 3 140 0.00 2.00 5-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul
♠
A Q J 6 2
♥
Q J 7
♦
Q 8 7
♣
Q J
♠
—
♥
A 10 9 5
♦
A J 9 4 3 2
♣
8 4 3
N
W
E
S
♠
K 8 7 5
♥
K 6 3
♦
K 10 6
♣
K 10 9
15 9 12 4
♠
10 9 4 3
♥
8 4 2
♦
5
♣
A 7 6 5 2
W 4♥; EW 3N; NS 3♠; E 3♥; EW 4♦; E 1♣; Par −100: NS 4♠×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ N ♦ 6 3 140 2.00 0.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
3 ♠ N ♦ 10 −1 50 1.00 1.00 2-Rafenstein-Adair vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♦ W ♣ Q 3 110 0.00 2.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
Board 17 North Deals None Vul
♠
Q 6 3
♥
A 5 4 3 2
♦
J 10 7
♣
9 3
♠
5 4
♥
J 8 6
♦
6 4 3
♣
A 10 7 5 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K J 9 7
♥
K 10
♦
A Q 9 5 2
♣
Q J
7 5 16 12
♠
A 10 8 2
♥
Q 9 7
♦
K 8
♣
K 8 6 4
EW 1N; EW 2♦; EW 2♣; EW 1♠; NS 1♥; Par −90
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ N ♣ Q 2 110 1.50 0.50 2-Rafenstein-Adair vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
2 ♥ N ♣ Q 2 110 1.50 0.50 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
1 ♦ E ♠ 2 3 110 0.00 2.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
—
♥
Q 10 9 8 7 4 2
♦
6 5 4
♣
9 8 6
♠
J 10 7 5 4 2
♥
A K
♦
10 2
♣
A 10 3
N
W
E
S
♠
A Q 6 3
♥
5 3
♦
K Q J
♣
K J 5 2
2 12 16 10
♠
K 9 8
♥
J 6
♦
A 9 8 7 3
♣
Q 7 4
EW 5N; EW 5♠; EW 4♣; EW 3♦; EW 1♥; Par −460
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ E ♥ J 5 450 1.50 0.50 2-Rafenstein-Adair vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♠ W ♦ 4 5 450 1.50 0.50 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
4 ♠ E ♥ J 6 480 0.00 2.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
9 2
♥
A J
♦
Q 9 7 5 4 3
♣
A Q J
♠
K J 8 6 5 4
♥
2
♦
K 8 6
♣
5 4 3
N
W
E
S
♠
10 7 3
♥
Q 7 6 5 4 3
♦
J 2
♣
9 7
14 7 3 16
♠
A Q
♥
K 10 9 8
♦
A 10
♣
K 10 8 6 2
S 6N; S 6♦; S 6♣; N 4N; N 5♦; N 5♣; NS 3♥; S 1♠; Par +990
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S ♠ 6 6 490 2.00 0.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 NT S ♠ 6 4 430 1.00 1.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
5 ♣ S ♥ 2 5 400 0.00 2.00 2-Rafenstein-Adair vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul
♠
Q 8 3
♥
J 10 5
♦
J 7 5
♣
10 9 8 6
♠
9 7 5
♥
A K 7 4 2
♦
9 6
♣
7 5 3
N
W
E
S
♠
A 4 2
♥
8 6 3
♦
10 4 3
♣
A K 4 2
4 7 11 18
♠
K J 10 6
♥
Q 9
♦
A K Q 8 2
♣
Q J
NS 2♠; NS 2♦; EW 1♥; NS 1♣; Par +110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♦ S ♥ A 2 90 2.00 0.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♦ S ♥ A −1 100 0.50 1.50 2-Rafenstein-Adair vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♦ S ♥ A −1 100 0.50 1.50 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
A Q J 9 3 2
♥
A J
♦
A Q
♣
8 7 3
♠
10
♥
K Q 10 8 5 2
♦
J
♣
K 10 9 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K 7 6 4
♥
9
♦
K 8 6 5 4 2
♣
A Q
18 9 12 1
♠
8 5
♥
7 6 4 3
♦
10 9 7 3
♣
J 6 5
EW 4♥; EW 4♣; N 2♠; S 1♠; Par −420
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♣ W ♠ A −2 100 2.00 0.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♣ W ♠ A 5 150 1.00 1.00 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
2 ♥ W ♠ A 4 170 0.00 2.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
9 6 5 3 2
♥
A 8 7
♦
A 8 5 3
♣
4
♠
A 4
♥
Q J 10 6 3 2
♦
Q 4 2
♣
Q 5
N
W
E
S
♠
K J 10 8
♥
9
♦
K 9 7 6
♣
10 9 7 6
8 11 7 14
♠
Q 7
♥
K 5 4
♦
J 10
♣
A K J 8 3 2
NS 2♣; NS 1♠; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; Par +90
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ W ♣ 4 −3 300 2.00 0.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
2 ♣ S ♠ A 2 90 1.00 1.00 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♣ S ♥ Q −2 100 0.00 2.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul
♠
Q 10 7
♥
J 9 3
♦
A 10 8
♣
A 10 7 6
♠
A K J 8 6
♥
K 5 4 2
♦
J 5
♣
J 5
N
W
E
S
♠
5 4 3
♥
—
♦
K 9 7 6 3
♣
K Q 8 3 2
11 13 8 8
♠
9 2
♥
A Q 10 8 7 6
♦
Q 4 2
♣
9 4
EW 3♠; NS 2♥; NS 1N; EW 2♦; EW 2♣; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠ W ♥ J −1 100 1.50 0.50 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
3 ♠ W ♥ J −1 100 1.50 0.50 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♥ S ♦ J −1 100 0.00 2.00 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
Board 24 West Deals None Vul
♠
Q 2
♥
Q 10 9 8 3
♦
A 3
♣
K Q 9 6
♠
8 7 5 4
♥
2
♦
K J 7 6
♣
A J 7 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K J 6 3
♥
A J 6
♦
Q 9 8
♣
10 8 5
13 9 11 7
♠
A 10 9
♥
K 7 5 4
♦
10 5 4 2
♣
4 3
NS 3♥; EW 2♠; NS 1N; EW 1♦; W 1♣; Par +100: EW 3♠×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ N ♦ 9 3 140 2.00 0.00 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
3 ♥ N ♣ 5 −1 50 0.50 1.50 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
3 ♥ N ♠ J −1 50 0.50 1.50 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
J 9 7 6 4 2
♥
Q 4
♦
—
♣
A Q 7 5 4
♠
A 5 3
♥
K 9 6
♦
A 8 6 5 4
♣
9 6
N
W
E
S
♠
8
♥
8 7 3
♦
K J 10 7 3
♣
K 10 3 2
9 11 7 13
♠
K Q 10
♥
A J 10 5 2
♦
Q 9 2
♣
J 8
NS 4♠; EW 4♦; NS 2♣; NS 1♥; Par +200: EW 5♦×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ N ♦ J 4 420 1.00 1.00 1-Lagodimos-Ciolli vs 4-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
4 ♠ N ♥ 3 4 420 1.00 1.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Rafenstein-Adair
4 ♠ N ♦ K 4 420 1.00 1.00 6-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Bunch-Kitamura
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008
