NEWSLETTER | PHOTOS | RECIPES | CONVENTION CARD | COMMENT | MASTERPOINT RACE
Click --> HAND PRINTOUT to view all hands or RECAP for recap format.
To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session May 22, 2013
Scores after 7 rounds Average: 31.5 Section E
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
7 65.87 41.50 B 1 1 0.80(A) Dan Bloch - Richard Keplinger
5 61.11 38.50 B 2 2 0.56(A) Cheryl Rankin - Carol Adair
8 52.38 33.00 A 3 0.40(A) Craig Cole - Marge Van Hemert
1 46.03 29.00 C 1 0.18(C) Carol Eklund - Laraine Havel
2 41.27 26.00 C Fran Hunter - Doral Hunter
4 39.68 25.00 A Thomas Ciolli - Jim Ciolli
3 30.95 19.50 C Dave Cleary - Fred Goodsell
6 62.70 39.50 A NE John Lagodimos - Kathie Angione
EW 3N; EW 3♠; EW 2♥; NS 3♦; EW 2♣; Par −100: NS 4♦×−1 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ E ♥ A −1 50 1.50 1.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Ciolli-Ciolli
4 ♠ W ♠ 9 −1 50 1.50 1.50 3-Cleary-Goodsell vs 7-Bloch-Keplinger
4 ♠ E ♥ A −1 50 1.50 1.50 5-Rankin-Adair vs 6-Lagodimos-Angione
3 ♠ W −1 50 1.50 1.50 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 1-Eklund-Havel
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♠; EW 4N; EW 4♥; EW 3♦; EW 2♣; Par −450 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ E 2 110 3.00 0.00 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 1-Eklund-Havel
1 ♠ E ♣ 3 4 170 2.00 1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Ciolli-Ciolli
1 NT W ♦ 9 4 180 1.00 2.00 5-Rankin-Adair vs 6-Lagodimos-Angione
1 NT E ♣ 4 5 210 0.00 3.00 3-Cleary-Goodsell vs 7-Bloch-Keplinger
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
W 4N; E 3N; EW 3♥; EW 4♦; EW 3♣; EW 1♠; Par −630 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♠ 4 −1 100 3.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Ciolli-Ciolli
2 ♣ E 2 90 2.00 1.00 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 1-Eklund-Havel
3 NT E ♣ 4 4 630 1.00 2.00 5-Rankin-Adair vs 6-Lagodimos-Angione
3 NT W ♥ 4 5 660 0.00 3.00 3-Cleary-Goodsell vs 7-Bloch-Keplinger
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♠; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ S ♦ 6 5 650 3.00 0.00 4-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Eklund-Havel
4 ♠ S ♥ 4 4 620 2.00 1.00 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠ S ♦ 6 4 170 1.00 2.00 3-Cleary-Goodsell vs 5-Rankin-Adair
4 ♠ S ♥ 4 −1 100 0.00 3.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 7-Bloch-Keplinger
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 2♠; NS 1N; EW 2♦; EW 1♥; E 1♣; Par −110 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♦ A 3 600 3.00 0.00 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 NT N ♥ 3 3 150 2.00 1.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 7-Bloch-Keplinger
2 NT E ♣ 2 −2 100 0.50 2.50 3-Cleary-Goodsell vs 5-Rankin-Adair
2 ♦× E ♦ 7 −1 100 0.50 2.50 4-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Eklund-Havel
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♣; EW 2♠; NS 3♦; EW 1♥; Par +130 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♣ S ♠ K 4 130 3.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 7-Bloch-Keplinger
2 ♣ S ♠ A 3 110 1.50 1.50 3-Cleary-Goodsell vs 5-Rankin-Adair
2 ♣ S ♠ K 3 110 1.50 1.50 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♥ W ♦ A −1 100 0.00 3.00 4-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Eklund-Havel
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 7♠; EW 4N; EW 4♦; EW 3♣; Par −2210 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ S ♦ 8 −1 100 3.00 0.00 7-Bloch-Keplinger vs 1-Eklund-Havel
4 ♠ E ♣ 5 7 710 1.50 1.50 5-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ E ♥ K 7 710 1.50 1.50 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 3-Cleary-Goodsell
6 ♠ E ♥ K 7 1460 0.00 3.00 4-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 6-Lagodimos-Angione
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 2♥; EW 1N; EW 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1♦; Par −110 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♦ E ♠ A −1 50 2.50 0.50 5-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♥ E ♠ A −1 50 2.50 0.50 7-Bloch-Keplinger vs 1-Eklund-Havel
2 NT E ♠ A 2 120 1.00 2.00 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 3-Cleary-Goodsell
2 ♥ E ♠ A 3 140 0.00 3.00 4-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 6-Lagodimos-Angione
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 6♣; EW 5N; E 4♥; W 3♥; EW 4♦; NS 1♠; Par −1100: NS 6♠×−5 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ S ♦ K −1 50 2.50 0.50 5-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ S ♦ A −1 50 2.50 0.50 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 3-Cleary-Goodsell
4 ♠× S ♦ A −1 100 0.50 2.50 4-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 6-Lagodimos-Angione
4 ♠ S ♦ A −2 100 0.50 2.50 7-Bloch-Keplinger vs 1-Eklund-Havel
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♥; EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 1♣; Par +140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ S ♠ A 3 140 3.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Cleary-Goodsell
3 ♥ S ♣ 8 −1 100 2.00 1.00 5-Rankin-Adair vs 7-Bloch-Keplinger
1 ♠ E ♦ A 2 110 1.00 2.00 1-Eklund-Havel vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ S ♠ A −3 300 0.00 3.00 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 4-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 2♥; EW 3♦; NS 1♣; Par −120 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♦ 2 −1 50 3.00 0.00 1-Eklund-Havel vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 NT W ♣ 10 2 120 2.00 1.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Cleary-Goodsell
2 NT W ♣ 10 3 150 1.00 2.00 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 4-Ciolli-Ciolli
1 NT E ♠ 6 4 180 0.00 3.00 5-Rankin-Adair vs 7-Bloch-Keplinger
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 5♥; NS 3♣; NS 1N; N 2♦; S 1♦; Par +650 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♠ 2 5 650 2.00 1.00 5-Rankin-Adair vs 7-Bloch-Keplinger
4 ♥ N ♠ 2 5 650 2.00 1.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Cleary-Goodsell
4 ♥ N ♥ 6 5 650 2.00 1.00 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 4-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 ♥ N ♣ 6 4 170 0.00 3.00 1-Eklund-Havel vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4N; NS 5♣; NS 4♦; S 2♠; N 1♠; EW 1♥; Par +630 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S ♠ K 5 660 3.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Eklund-Havel
3 ♣ S ♠ K 5 150 2.00 1.00 7-Bloch-Keplinger vs 4-Ciolli-Ciolli
5 ♦ N ♥ J −1 100 0.50 2.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Cleary-Goodsell
3 NT S ♠ 9 −1 100 0.50 2.50 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 5-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 3♦; NS 2♣; W 1♥; Par −110 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ E ♠ 2 −1 50 3.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Cleary-Goodsell
2 ♠ N ♣ A −2 100 1.50 1.50 7-Bloch-Keplinger vs 4-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 ♥ N ♦ K −2 100 1.50 1.50 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 5-Rankin-Adair
1 NT× W ♠ 4 3 380 0.00 3.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Eklund-Havel
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N 3N; NS 3♥; NS 4♣; S 2N; NS 2♠; NS 1♦; Par +600 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♦ 7 6 690 3.00 0.00 7-Bloch-Keplinger vs 4-Ciolli-Ciolli
4 ♥ N ♠ 6 5 650 2.00 1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Cleary-Goodsell
4 ♥ N ♣ 4 −1 100 0.50 2.50 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Eklund-Havel
4 ♥ N ♦ Q −1 100 0.50 2.50 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 5-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3N; NS 3♥; NS 4♣; NS 3♦; NS 1♠; Par +400 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S ♦ 6 5 460 3.00 0.00 7-Bloch-Keplinger vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT S ♦ 6 3 400 2.00 1.00 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 6-Lagodimos-Angione
1 ♥ N ♦ 5 4 170 1.00 2.00 3-Cleary-Goodsell vs 4-Ciolli-Ciolli
2 ♥ N ♦ 5 3 140 0.00 3.00 1-Eklund-Havel vs 5-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3N; EW 5♦; EW 5♣; EW 1♠; E 1♥; Par −400 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ S ♥ K −2 100 3.00 0.00 7-Bloch-Keplinger vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♣ W ♥ Q 5 150 1.50 1.50 1-Eklund-Havel vs 5-Rankin-Adair
3 ♣ W ♠ 4 5 150 1.50 1.50 3-Cleary-Goodsell vs 4-Ciolli-Ciolli
2 ♥× N ♦ K −2 300 0.00 3.00 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 6-Lagodimos-Angione
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N 3♥; EW 4♣; N 2♠; NS 1N; S 1♠; S 1♥; EW 1♦; Par −130 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 NT× E ♥ A −2 300 2.50 0.50 7-Bloch-Keplinger vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
5 ♣× W ♦ 9 −2 300 2.50 0.50 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 6-Lagodimos-Angione
5 ♣ W ♦ 7 −2 100 1.00 2.00 1-Eklund-Havel vs 5-Rankin-Adair
3 ♥ S ♣ K −1 100 0.00 3.00 3-Cleary-Goodsell vs 4-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♥; EW 4N; EW 5♦; EW 4♣; EW 1♠; Par −650 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ E ♣ 7 5 650 2.00 1.00 1-Eklund-Havel vs 3-Cleary-Goodsell
4 ♥ E ♠ Q 5 650 2.00 1.00 4-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Rankin-Adair
4 ♥ E ♠ 3 5 650 2.00 1.00 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 7-Bloch-Keplinger
4 ♥ E ♣ 5 7 710 0.00 3.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Lagodimos-Angione
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♣; NS 3♠; W 4♦; EW 2N; EW 2♥; E 3♦; Par −500: NS 5♠×−2 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠× N ♣ 7 3 730 3.00 0.00 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 7-Bloch-Keplinger
2 ♣ E ♠ 5 5 150 2.00 1.00 1-Eklund-Havel vs 3-Cleary-Goodsell
3 NT E ♠ 2 3 600 0.50 2.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Lagodimos-Angione
5 ♣ W ♥ K 5 600 0.50 2.50 4-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 1N; NS 2♦; N 1♥; EW 1♣; Par −140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 ♣× N ♥ 6 1 140 3.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Lagodimos-Angione
1 NT N ♦ 7 2 120 2.00 1.00 1-Eklund-Havel vs 3-Cleary-Goodsell
2 ♠ W ♥ A −1 50 1.00 2.00 4-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Rankin-Adair
2 ♠ W ♥ A 2 110 0.00 3.00 8-Cole-Van Hemert vs 7-Bloch-Keplinger
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008