HOME | LOCATION | BRIDGESKOOL | CALENDAR | ROSTER | BIDDING | SIGN UP | CONTACT
NEWSLETTER | PHOTOS | RECIPES | CONVENTION CARD | COMMENT | MASTERPOINT RACE


Click --> HAND PRINTOUT to view all hands or RECAP for recap format.

To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!


Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session August 28, 2013
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   25.0      Section  E
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  4   61.00   30.50  C   1     1     1    0.60(A)  Fran Hunter - Doral Hunter
  3   59.00   29.50  B   2     2          0.42(A)  Judi Bunch - Hiroko Kitamura
  1   44.00   22.00  B                             Roy Shepard - Richard Keplinger
  5   44.00   22.00  C                             Cheryl Rankin - Liz Cogdill
  2   35.00   17.50  C                             Gary Piazzoni - Dan Bloch
  6   57.00   28.50  A  NE                         Kathie Angione - John Lagodimos



Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
♠ J 10 4 3
♥ J 5 4 2
♦ A K
♣ K 10 4
♠ A 9 8 2
♥ K 9 7
♦ 10 2
♣ 6 5 3 2
N
WE
S
♠ K Q 7 5
♥ 8
♦ J 8 6 5 3
♣ A 9 7
12
7    10
11
♠ 6
♥ A Q 10 6 3
♦ Q 9 7 4
♣ Q J 8

NS 4♥; NS 1N; EW 1♠; NS 1♦; Par +420

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
4 ♥      S  ♦ 10     4   420         1.00   1.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch
4 ♥      S  ♦ 10     4   420         1.00   1.00 5-Rankin-Cogdill vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♥      S  ♦ 10     4   420         1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ 5
♥ J 6 2
♦ 7 6 5 2
♣ A Q 7 3 2
♠ Q J 9 4
♥ K Q 4
♦ 9 8 4
♣ 8 6 5
N
WE
S
♠ K 10 2
♥ 10 9 8 7 5
♦ A J 10
♣ 9 4
7
8    8
17
♠ A 8 7 6 3
♥ A 3
♦ K Q 3
♣ K J 10

NS 3N; NS 5♣; S 4♦; S 2♠; N 3♦; N 1♠; NS 1♥; Par +600

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 NT     S  ♠ Q      3   600         2.00   0.00 5-Rankin-Cogdill vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
2 NT     N  ♥ 10     4   180         1.00   1.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch
2 NT     N  ♥ 10     3   150         0.00   2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 9 4 3 2
♥ K Q J 5 2
♦ K 8
♣ 10 8
♠ A K 6
♥ 9 4
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ A J 7 4
N
WE
S
♠ Q 10 8
♥ A 10 8 6 3
♦ Q 5
♣ Q 5 2
9
13    10
8
♠ J 7 5
♥ 7
♦ A 10 7 6 3
♣ K 9 6 3

EW 2N; EW 2♥; EW 2♦; EW 2♣; EW 1♠; Par −120

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
2 NT     E  ♠ 3     −1   100         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger
4 ♥      N  ♣ 2     −1          50   1.00   1.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch
1 NT     E  ♥ 7      2         120   0.00   2.00 5-Rankin-Cogdill vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ K J 8
♥ 8 6 5 2
♦ 5 2
♣ A Q J 5
♠ A 9 6 5
♥ A J
♦ A K
♣ K 10 9 4 3
N
WE
S
♠ 10 7 4 2
♥ Q 3
♦ 10 9 6 4
♣ 7 6 2
11
19    2
8
♠ Q 3
♥ K 10 9 7 4
♦ Q J 8 7 3
♣ 8

EW 2♠; NS 2♥; NS 2♦; EW 2♣; Par −110

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
4 ♠      E  ♣ 8     −4   400         2.00   0.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch
2 ♥      S  ♦ A      3   140         1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger
2 ♠      W  ♥ 2      3         140   0.00   2.00 5-Rankin-Cogdill vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ Q 7 6 2
♥ 9
♦ Q J 10 8 6 4
♣ 7 6
♠ A J 8 4 3
♥ A 8 6 4
♦ —
♣ K Q 4 2
N
WE
S
♠ 10 9 5
♥ J 2
♦ A 9 5 3 2
♣ 9 8 3
5
14    5
16
♠ K
♥ K Q 10 7 5 3
♦ K 7
♣ A J 10 5

EW 2♠; S 2♥; NS 2♦; N 1♥; EW 1♣; Par −110

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 ♦      N  ♠ 10     3   110         2.00   0.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch
3 ♥      S  ♠ A     −1         100   1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger
2 ♠      W  ♥ 9      2         110   0.00   2.00 5-Rankin-Cogdill vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 10
♥ A Q J 8
♦ K Q
♣ A K J 9 8 7
♠ Q 6
♥ K 10 7
♦ 10 8 7 6 2
♣ Q 6 3
N
WE
S
♠ A K 9 7 5
♥ 9 5 4 3
♦ 4 3
♣ 10 5
20
7    7
6
♠ J 8 4 3 2
♥ 6 2
♦ A J 9 5
♣ 4 2

NS 6♣; NS 4N; NS 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 3♦; Par +920

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
1 ♠×     E  ♣ 4     −4  1100         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch
3 ♣      N  ♠ K      4   130         1.00   1.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
6 ♣      N  ♠ A     −2         100   0.00   2.00 1-Shepard-Keplinger vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ J
♥ J 8 4
♦ J 8 7 6 5 2
♣ A Q 10
♠ K 9 7 6 2
♥ K 3
♦ 9
♣ K J 5 3 2
N
WE
S
♠ A 10 5 3
♥ Q 10 7 6 2
♦ A 10 4 3
♣ —
9
10    10
11
♠ Q 8 4
♥ A 9 5
♦ K Q
♣ 9 8 7 6 4

EW 5♠; EW 3♥; EW 1N; NS 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −650

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 ♥      E  ♦ K      5         200   1.00   1.00 1-Shepard-Keplinger vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill
3 ♠      W  ♥ 8      5         200   1.00   1.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♣      S  ♦ 9     −2         200   1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
♠ 9 8 6 2
♥ K 10 8
♦ J 10 5
♣ A 9 3
♠ K 7 5
♥ A Q 9 5
♦ A
♣ K J 10 8 4
N
WE
S
♠ J 3
♥ J 6 3
♦ K 9 6 4 2
♣ Q 6 5
8
17    7
8
♠ A Q 10 4
♥ 7 4 2
♦ Q 8 7 3
♣ 7 2

EW 3♥; EW 4♣; EW 2N; EW 2♦; Par −140

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
2 ♠      S  ♦ A     −1          50   2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch
2 ♠      S  ♣ J     −3         150   1.00   1.00 1-Shepard-Keplinger vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill
3 NT     E  ♠ 4      3         400   0.00   2.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 9 4 3
♥ 10 9 7 4 3
♦ A K 7 3
♣ 10
♠ K Q J 10
♥ A 2
♦ J 5
♣ K J 8 6 4
N
WE
S
♠ 8
♥ K Q 8 6 5
♦ 9 6 4 2
♣ Q 3 2
7
15    7
11
♠ A 7 6 5 2
♥ J
♦ Q 10 8
♣ A 9 7 5

NS 2♠; EW 1N; EW 2♣; NS 1♦; Par +110

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 ♣      W  ♠ 3     −1   100         2.00   0.00 1-Shepard-Keplinger vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill
3 ♠      S  ♦ J     −1          50   1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch
3 ♣      W  ♠ 4      3         110   0.00   2.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
♠ K J 10 9 8 7
♥ A K 5
♦ 8 2
♣ J 9
♠ A 6 5
♥ Q 9 8 2
♦ —
♣ K Q 7 6 4 2
N
WE
S
♠ Q
♥ 10 7
♦ K Q J 10 9 6 5 4
♣ A 5
12
11    12
5
♠ 4 3 2
♥ J 6 4 3
♦ A 7 3
♣ 10 8 3

EW 4♦; EW 4♣; EW 2♥; EW 1N; NS 1♠; Par −130

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
4 ♦      E  ♠ 2      4         130   2.00   0.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♠      N  ♦ K     −4         400   1.00   1.00 1-Shepard-Keplinger vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill
4 ♦×     W  ♠ 4      5         910   0.00   2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
♠ K J 4 2
♥ K Q J
♦ 9 6 2
♣ K 4 3
♠ 5 3
♥ A 8 5 3
♦ J 10 3
♣ Q J 8 6
N
WE
S
♠ A Q 10 7
♥ 10 9 7 6 2
♦ 7 4
♣ 10 9
13
8    6
13
♠ 9 8 6
♥ 4
♦ A K Q 8 5
♣ A 7 5 2

NS 3N; NS 2♠; N 3♦; S 2♦; N 2♣; EW 1♥; S 1♣; Par +400

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 NT     S  ♥ 8      3   400         1.50   0.50 2-Piazzoni-Bloch vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger
3 NT     N  ♥ 6      3   400         1.50   0.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
2 ♦      S  ♠ 5      3   110         0.00   2.00 5-Rankin-Cogdill vs 4-Hunter-Hunter

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠ A 6 4
♥ 9 7 5
♦ A K 10 5
♣ 7 5 4
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ Q 6 2
♦ Q J 8 7 4
♣ 9
N
WE
S
♠ K 10 5 3
♥ K 4 3
♦ 6 3
♣ A K 10 6
11
6    13
10
♠ Q 7
♥ A J 10 8
♦ 9 2
♣ Q J 8 3 2

NS 2N; NS 2♥; N 3♣; S 2♣; EW 1♠; NS 1♦; Par +120

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
1 ♥      S  ♣ 9      2   110         1.50   0.50 5-Rankin-Cogdill vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♣      S           3   110         1.50   0.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
2 ♥      S  ♣ 9     −1         100   0.00   2.00 2-Piazzoni-Bloch vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
♠ J 8 5
♥ K 10 7 4
♦ A 6 4
♣ 10 7 3
♠ 9 6 4
♥ A
♦ J 9 8 7 2
♣ A Q 6 5
N
WE
S
♠ A Q 7 3
♥ Q J 9 8 6 3
♦ K
♣ 9 4
8
11    12
9
♠ K 10 2
♥ 5 2
♦ Q 10 5 3
♣ K J 8 2

E 2♠; EW 2♥; NS 1N; W 1♠; Par −110

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 NT     W  ♣ 3     −3   300         1.50   0.50 2-Piazzoni-Bloch vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger
3 NT     W  ♠ 4     −3   300         1.50   0.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♥      E  ♥ 2     −1   100         0.00   2.00 5-Rankin-Cogdill vs 4-Hunter-Hunter

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
♠ Q 5 4
♥ A 8 6
♦ A J 5 2
♣ J 6 5
♠ 9 8 2
♥ K J 10 9 5 2
♦ 6
♣ 8 7 2
N
WE
S
♠ K J 10 6
♥ Q
♦ 9 7 3
♣ K Q 10 4 3
12
4    11
13
♠ A 7 3
♥ 7 4 3
♦ K Q 10 8 4
♣ A 9

NS 3N; EW 2♥; NS 3♦; Par +300: EW 4♥×−2

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 NT     S  ♥ J      3   400         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♦      S  ♠ 9      3   110         1.00   1.00 5-Rankin-Cogdill vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥      W  ♦ A     −1    50         0.00   2.00 2-Piazzoni-Bloch vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠ 9
♥ J 10 9 6 3
♦ K 5
♣ Q J 7 5 3
♠ 10 4 3
♥ A K 7 5 2
♦ A
♣ A 10 6 4
N
WE
S
♠ K J 8 6 5 2
♥ 8 4
♦ 9 8 7 3
♣ 8
7
15    4
14
♠ A Q 7
♥ Q
♦ Q J 10 6 4 2
♣ K 9 2

E 3♠; NS 2N; W 2♠; NS 3♣; NS 2♦; Par −140

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
2 ♠      E  ♣ 9      2         110   2.00   0.00 5-Rankin-Cogdill vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠      E  ♥ Q      3         140   0.50   1.50 2-Piazzoni-Bloch vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger
3 ♠      E  ♥ Q      3         140   0.50   1.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠ A K 8
♥ J 6 5 4
♦ 9 8 3
♣ K 6 3
♠ J 7 2
♥ K 7 3
♦ A J 10 5 2
♣ 8 4
N
WE
S
♠ 10 6 5 3
♥ A 10 9 8
♦ Q 4
♣ Q 9 5
11
9    8
12
♠ Q 9 4
♥ Q 2
♦ K 7 6
♣ A J 10 7 2

NS 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; Par +90

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
2 NT     S  ♦ 5      3   150         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♣      S  ♦ A      2    90         0.50   1.50 2-Piazzoni-Bloch vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill
1 NT     S  ♦ 5      1    90         0.50   1.50 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
♠ 10 9 8 2
♥ K 2
♦ A Q 9 2
♣ A 7 3
♠ A K 4 3
♥ A J 10
♦ J 10 3
♣ 6 5 4
N
WE
S
♠ J 7 5
♥ Q 9 8 6
♦ 7 6 5 4
♣ Q 2
13
13    5
9
♠ Q 6
♥ 7 5 4 3
♦ K 8
♣ K J 10 9 8

NS 3N; NS 4♦; NS 4♣; NS 2♠; NS 1♥; Par +400

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
1 NT     N  ♠ J      5   210         2.00   0.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger
1 NT     S  ♠ 3      3   150         1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♣      S  ♠ A      4   130         0.00   2.00 2-Piazzoni-Bloch vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ J 7 6 4 2
♥ K 4
♦ 6 5 3 2
♣ A J
♠ K Q 10 9
♥ A Q 9 8
♦ K 7
♣ 10 9 6
N
WE
S
♠ 8 5 3
♥ J 10 7 3
♦ Q 10 8
♣ 7 4 2
9
14    3
14
♠ A
♥ 6 5 2
♦ A J 9 4
♣ K Q 8 5 3

NS 3N; NS 5♦; NS 4♣; NS 2♠; NS 1♥; Par +600

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
2 ♦      S  ♥ 8      5   150         2.00   0.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger
3 ♦      S  ♥ A      4   130         1.00   1.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♦      S  ♣ 10    −1         100   0.00   2.00 2-Piazzoni-Bloch vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 9 7
♥ J 4 3
♦ A 2
♣ K J 10 8 7 5
♠ K J 10 2
♥ 7 6
♦ 9 8 4
♣ A Q 4 3
N
WE
S
♠ A Q 6 5 4
♥ 10 9
♦ Q 10 6 3
♣ 9 6
9
10    8
13
♠ 8 3
♥ A K Q 8 5 2
♦ K J 7 5
♣ 2

NS 4♥; NS 3♣; NS 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♠; Par +420

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
4 ♥      S  ♠ K      4   420         2.00   0.00 2-Piazzoni-Bloch vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill
4 ♥      S  ♥ 6     −1          50   0.50   1.50 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger
4 ♥      S          −1          50   0.50   1.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Hunter-Hunter

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ Q 7 5 3 2
♥ 6 4
♦ 9 5 3
♣ K 6 4
♠ J 6
♥ 10 8 5
♦ A 4
♣ A J 10 9 5 2
N
WE
S
♠ K 10 4
♥ 9 7 3
♦ Q J 10 6
♣ 8 7 3
5
10    6
19
♠ A 9 8
♥ A K Q J 2
♦ K 8 7 2
♣ Q

NS 3♠; NS 2♥; NS 1N; NS 2♦; EW 2♣; Par +140

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
2 NT     S  ♣ J      2   120         2.00   0.00 2-Piazzoni-Bloch vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill
4 ♠      N  ♣ 8     −1         100   1.00   1.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 1-Shepard-Keplinger
4 ♥      S  ♣ A     −3         300   0.00   2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Hunter-Hunter

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ J 10 9
♥ 9 8 7 6
♦ A K 4
♣ 9 6 3
♠ 5 3
♥ A 5 4 3
♦ J 10
♣ K J 5 4 2
N
WE
S
♠ K Q 6 4 2
♥ Q
♦ Q 8 7 6
♣ Q 10 8
8
9    11
12
♠ A 8 7
♥ K J 10 2
♦ 9 5 3 2
♣ A 7

NS 2♥; NS 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♣; Par +110

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
2 ♥      N  ♠ K      2   110         2.00   0.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch
2 ♠      E  ♥ J     −1    50         0.50   1.50 1-Shepard-Keplinger vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♣      W          −1    50         0.50   1.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ A K 7 6 4
♥ K J
♦ 8
♣ K J 8 7 6
♠ Q 9 2
♥ 7 5
♦ K 10 7
♣ A Q 9 4 2
N
WE
S
♠ 3
♥ A 9 8 6 4
♦ A Q J 9 5 3
♣ 3
15
11    11
3
♠ J 10 8 5
♥ Q 10 3 2
♦ 6 4 2
♣ 10 5

W 3N; EW 5♦; NS 3♠; W 3♥; E 2N; E 2♥; W 1♣; Par −300: NS 5♠×−2

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 ♥×     E  ♠ J     −2   500         2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill
4 ♦      E  ♣ 10    −1   100         1.00   1.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch
4 ♠      N  ♣ 3     −1          50   0.00   2.00 1-Shepard-Keplinger vs 4-Hunter-Hunter

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ 8 4 3
♥ Q J 7 5
♦ J 8 3
♣ J 7 5
♠ K Q 9 5 2
♥ 10 9
♦ A 7
♣ K 9 6 4
N
WE
S
♠ J 10 7 6
♥ K 3
♦ K 10 6 2
♣ A 10 3
5
12    11
12
♠ A
♥ A 8 6 4 2
♦ Q 9 5 4
♣ Q 8 2

E 4♠; W 3♠; E 2N; EW 3♣; W 1N; E 2♦; NS 1♥; Par −620

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 ♥      S  ♠ K     −1         100   2.00   0.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill
3 ♠      W  ♥ Q      3         140   1.00   1.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch
1 ♠      W  ♥ Q      4         170   0.00   2.00 1-Shepard-Keplinger vs 4-Hunter-Hunter

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
♠ 8 5
♥ 9 6 4 2
♦ 10
♣ Q 9 8 7 5 4
♠ Q J 6 4
♥ 10 7 3
♦ A 5 4 3
♣ A 10
N
WE
S
♠ K 9 2
♥ Q 8 5
♦ Q 9 8 6
♣ K 6 3
2
11    10
17
♠ A 10 7 3
♥ A K J
♦ K J 7 2
♣ J 2

E 2N; NS 3♣; W 1N; E 2♦; EW 1♠; NS 1♥; W 1♦; Par +100: E 3♦×−1; E 3N×−1

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 ♣      S  ♥ 3      3   110         1.50   0.50 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch
3 ♣      S  ♠ Q      3   110         1.50   0.50 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill
1 NT     S  ♦ 3      1    90         0.00   2.00 1-Shepard-Keplinger vs 4-Hunter-Hunter

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 7 4
♥ 9 7
♦ A 10 6 3 2
♣ A K Q 9
♠ A J 3
♥ A Q 3 2
♦ K Q
♣ 7 5 4 3
N
WE
S
♠ K Q 10 9 6 5
♥ 5
♦ J 9 8 7
♣ 10 6
13
16    6
5
♠ 8 2
♥ K J 10 8 6 4
♦ 5 4
♣ J 8 2

EW 4♠; EW 2N; NS 2♥; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −500: NS 5♥×−3

CONTRACT BY LEAD  MADE   SCORES      MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
                         N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
3 ♦      N  ♠ K     −4         200   2.00   0.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Piazzoni-Bloch
4 ♠×     E  ♥ 8      4         790   1.00   1.00 1-Shepard-Keplinger vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
6 ♦×     N          −7        1700   0.00   2.00 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Rankin-Cogdill

Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008 web counter