To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session October 16, 2013
Scores after 5 rounds Average: 10.0 Section E
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
4 55.00 11.00 A 1 0.50(A) Donna Rafenstein - Carol Adair
2 50.00 10.00 A 2/3 0.30(A) Fran Hunter - Doral Hunter
5 50.00 10.00 A 2/3 0.30(A) Roy Shepard - Tom Turner
1 35.00 7.00 A Jim Ciolli - Thomas Ciolli
3 60.00 12.00 A NE Kathie Angione - John Lagodimos
Board 1 North Deals None Vul
♠
Q 5 2
♥
J
♦
Q 8 7 5
♣
A K 9 8 4
♠
10 9
♥
9 7 5
♦
A K 10 6 3 2
♣
Q 10
N
W
E
S
♠
K J 8 6 4 3
♥
Q 6
♦
9
♣
7 6 5 2
12 9 6 13
♠
A 7
♥
A K 10 8 4 3 2
♦
J 4
♣
J 3
NS 5N; NS 5♥; NS 5♣; NS 2♦; Par +460
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♣ 7 4 430 1.00 0.00 5-Shepard-Turner vs 3-Angione-Lagodimos
3 ♥ S ♠ 10 6 230 0.00 1.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
Q 4
♥
J 9 7 5 3
♦
K 10
♣
K 5 4 3
♠
A 6 3
♥
A K Q
♦
7 6 4 3
♣
A Q 9
N
W
E
S
♠
K 10 9 8 2
♥
10 8 4
♦
J 2
♣
J 6 2
9 19 5 7
♠
J 7 5
♥
6 2
♦
A Q 9 8 5
♣
10 8 7
EW 3♠; EW 1N; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT W ♥ 5 2 120 1.00 0.00 5-Shepard-Turner vs 3-Angione-Lagodimos
3 ♠ E ♦ A 3 140 0.00 1.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
Q J 10 9 3
♥
6
♦
A K J
♣
Q 10 7 5
♠
K 2
♥
A Q J 10
♦
Q 10 9 6 5 3
♣
3
N
W
E
S
♠
7 6 5
♥
9 7 5 4
♦
8 4
♣
A K 8 4
13 12 7 8
♠
A 8 4
♥
K 8 3 2
♦
7 2
♣
J 9 6 2
NS 3♠; EW 2♥; NS 3♣; NS 1N; EW 2♦; Par +140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ N ♦ 8 2 110 1.00 0.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
1 ♥ W ♣ 3 2 110 0.00 1.00 5-Shepard-Turner vs 3-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul
♠
10 9 8
♥
K J 2
♦
Q 6 4
♣
Q 10 9 3
♠
K 4 2
♥
A Q 10 5
♦
J 10 7
♣
J 7 6
N
W
E
S
♠
A 6 5 3
♥
8 6 4 3
♦
A 3 2
♣
K 8
8 11 11 10
♠
Q J 7
♥
9 7
♦
K 9 8 5
♣
A 5 4 2
EW 2♥; EW 1♠; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
Pass Pass 1.00 0.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
1 ♥ W ♣ 3 2 110 0.00 1.00 5-Shepard-Turner vs 3-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
8 7 5
♥
Q 10 9 2
♦
Q 4 2
♣
A K 4
♠
Q J 6 4 3 2
♥
A J 6
♦
6
♣
Q 6 2
N
W
E
S
♠
A K
♥
K 8 5 4
♦
J 5 3
♣
J 8 7 3
11 10 12 7
♠
10 9
♥
7 3
♦
A K 10 9 8 7
♣
10 9 5
W 4♠; E 3♠; EW 2♥; NS 2♦; W 2♣; E 1♣; Par −420
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦× S ♠ Q 3 670 1.00 0.00 5-Shepard-Turner vs 3-Angione-Lagodimos
4 ♠ W ♣ A 4 420 0.00 1.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
7 3
♥
Q 10 8 6 4
♦
10 7 6 2
♣
K J
♠
9 8 4
♥
J 7 2
♦
A 4
♣
8 7 6 5 3
N
W
E
S
♠
Q J 10
♥
A 9
♦
K 9 8 3
♣
A Q 10 4
6 5 16 13
♠
A K 6 5 2
♥
K 5 3
♦
Q J 5
♣
9 2
EW 2N; EW 3♣; NS 1♥; Par −120
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♦ N ♠ Q −1 50 1.00 0.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Shepard-Turner
2 ♠ S ♦ A −3 150 0.00 1.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 3-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul
♠
Q 9
♥
K J 9 6 3
♦
7 5
♣
Q 8 7 2
♠
A 7 4 2
♥
Q 7 2
♦
A 6
♣
K 10 5 3
N
W
E
S
♠
K 6 3
♥
A 10 5 4
♦
K Q 3
♣
A J 4
8 13 17 2
♠
J 10 8 5
♥
8
♦
J 10 9 8 4 2
♣
9 6
EW 5N; W 5♥; EW 4♠; E 4♥; W 5♣; E 4♣; EW 2♦; Par −660
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♦ J 4 630 1.00 0.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Shepard-Turner
3 NT W ♣ 2 5 660 0.00 1.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 3-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 8 West Deals None Vul
♠
A J 5 3
♥
A 9 6
♦
K 8
♣
J 8 4 2
♠
10 2
♥
K J 10 8 3 2
♦
J 9 6 4 3
♣
—
N
W
E
S
♠
8 4
♥
Q
♦
Q 10 7 5 2
♣
A Q 10 6 5
13 5 10 12
♠
K Q 9 7 6
♥
7 5 4
♦
A
♣
K 9 7 3
S 4♠; NS 3N; N 3♠; EW 2♥; NS 3♣; EW 2♦; Par +420
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ S ♦ 4 6 480 1.00 0.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Shepard-Turner
5 ♦ E ♣ 9 −1 50 0.00 1.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 3-Angione-Lagodimos
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
J 10 9 6 4 3 2
♥
9 7
♦
K
♣
7 3 2
♠
K 5
♥
Q 8
♦
A 9 8 7 4 2
♣
K J 4
N
W
E
S
♠
A Q 8 7
♥
A 10 5 2
♦
6 3
♣
A Q 8
4 13 16 7
♠
—
♥
K J 6 4 3
♦
Q J 10 5
♣
10 9 6 5
EW 3N; EW 3♠; E 4♦; EW 2♥; W 3♦; EW 2♣; Par −600
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠ N ♦ 6 −2 100 1.00 0.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 3-Angione-Lagodimos
4 ♦ W ♠ J 4 130 0.00 1.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Shepard-Turner
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul
♠
J 5
♥
10 8 6
♦
8 6 4 2
♣
A 7 6 2
♠
A Q 9 8 6 4
♥
7
♦
Q J 7 5
♣
10 4
N
W
E
S
♠
10 7 2
♥
A Q J 9 5 3
♦
—
♣
Q 9 8 5
5 9 9 17
♠
K 3
♥
K 4 2
♦
A K 10 9 3
♣
K J 3
EW 4♠; EW 3♥; E 2N; W 1N; NS 2♦; E 1♣; Par −620
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠ W ♣ A 4 170 1.00 0.00 4-Rafenstein-Adair vs 3-Angione-Lagodimos
3 ♦ S ♥ 7 −2 200 0.00 1.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Shepard-Turner
Board 11 South Deals None Vul
♠
6
♥
9 7 4
♦
K 6 5
♣
J 10 7 5 4 3
♠
K Q J 9 4 3
♥
K 3 2
♦
J 2
♣
Q 2
N
W
E
S
♠
A 10 5 2
♥
10 8 6 5
♦
Q 4 3
♣
9 8
4 12 6 18
♠
8 7
♥
A Q J
♦
A 10 9 8 7
♣
A K 6
NS 4♦; NS 4♣; NS 1N; EW 1♠; S 1♥; Par +130
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠ W ♦ 5 −2 100 1.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
1 ♠ W ♦ K 2 110 0.00 1.00 5-Shepard-Turner vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul
♠
K 10 8 3
♥
A 9 3
♦
8 6 5 3
♣
A 8
♠
A Q 7 4
♥
8 6
♦
A 10 7 2
♣
Q 10 6
N
W
E
S
♠
9 5
♥
J 10 5 4
♦
K J 4
♣
9 7 4 2
11 12 5 12
♠
J 6 2
♥
K Q 7 2
♦
Q 9
♣
K J 5 3
NS 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 2N; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 ♦ W ♣ A −1 50 0.50 0.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
1 NT E ♣ 3 −1 50 0.50 0.50 5-Shepard-Turner vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul
♠
Q J 8 3
♥
9 6 2
♦
J 9 8 7 2
♣
4
♠
K 5 2
♥
Q 7 5
♦
5 4
♣
A K Q 10 2
N
W
E
S
♠
A 10 4
♥
A 10 4 3
♦
K Q 6
♣
9 6 3
4 14 13 9
♠
9 7 6
♥
K J 8
♦
A 10 3
♣
J 8 7 5
EW 4N; EW 4♥; W 5♣; E 4♣; EW 2♠; Par −630
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♦ 7 4 630 1.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 NT E ♠ 9 5 660 0.00 1.00 5-Shepard-Turner vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
Board 14 East Deals None Vul
♠
K 6 4
♥
Q 5
♦
J 9 8 2
♣
10 9 5 4
♠
10 2
♥
K 10 9 7 3 2
♦
A K
♣
A K 7
N
W
E
S
♠
A 9 7 5
♥
A J 6
♦
6 4
♣
Q J 6 2
6 17 12 5
♠
Q J 8 3
♥
8 4
♦
Q 10 7 5 3
♣
8 3
EW 7N; EW 7♥; EW 7♣; EW 3♠; EW 1♦; Par −1520
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♦ 2 6 480 1.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
5 ♥ W ♦ 2 7 510 0.00 1.00 5-Shepard-Turner vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul
♠
K Q 4 2
♥
J 9 6 2
♦
K 8
♣
A 6 3
♠
10 6
♥
Q 10 8 4
♦
10 6 5 4 3 2
♣
5
N
W
E
S
♠
9 7 3
♥
K 7 5
♦
Q 9 7
♣
Q J 10 2
13 2 8 17
♠
A J 8 5
♥
A 3
♦
A J
♣
K 9 8 7 4
NS 5♠; NS 3N; NS 3♥; NS 4♣; NS 1♦; Par +650
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ S ♣ 5 4 620 0.50 0.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
4 ♠ S ♣ 5 4 620 0.50 0.50 5-Shepard-Turner vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul
♠
A K Q 10
♥
A 8 4 3 2
♦
10 4 3
♣
4
♠
8 2
♥
6 5
♦
A Q J 9 8 6 5
♣
A K
N
W
E
S
♠
9 7 6 4
♥
Q J 9
♦
K
♣
10 8 6 5 2
13 14 6 7
♠
J 5 3
♥
K 10 7
♦
7 2
♣
Q J 9 7 3
NS 3♥; NS 2♠; EW 3♦; EW 1N; NS 1♣; Par +140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ N ♥ K 3 140 0.50 0.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Shepard-Turner
3 ♥ N ♦ K 3 140 0.50 0.50 3-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
Board 17 North Deals None Vul
♠
A J
♥
A 10 5 2
♦
A Q 7
♣
Q J 9 4
♠
Q 9 5 4 2
♥
K 9
♦
K J 9 6
♣
K 5
N
W
E
S
♠
10
♥
Q 8 6 4
♦
10 5 3 2
♣
A 10 8 6
18 12 6 4
♠
K 8 7 6 3
♥
J 7 3
♦
8 4
♣
7 3 2
NS 1N; W 2♦; NS 1♠; NS 1♥; E 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −90
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ N ♣ 6 −1 50 0.50 0.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Shepard-Turner
1 NT N ♠ 10 −1 50 0.50 0.50 3-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
A J 10 7
♥
—
♦
A J 7 4
♣
J 10 5 4 3
♠
8 4 3
♥
10 9 6 4 2
♦
Q 5
♣
A 9 7
N
W
E
S
♠
K 5 2
♥
A Q 8 7 3
♦
9 6
♣
K Q 6
11 6 14 9
♠
Q 9 6
♥
K J 5
♦
K 10 8 3 2
♣
8 2
N 3♠; NS 4♦; NS 2N; S 2♠; N 3♣; S 2♣; EW 1♥; Par +140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♥× E ♠ 6 −4 800 1.00 0.00 3-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 ♥ E ♣ 5 −2 100 0.00 1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Shepard-Turner
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
3
♥
K 6 5
♦
8 5 4
♣
A 10 7 6 4 3
♠
K 5 2
♥
A Q 8 7 3 2
♦
10 9 2
♣
2
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 10 6 4
♥
J 9 4
♦
A K J 3
♣
J 5
7 9 12 12
♠
A J 9 8 7
♥
10
♦
Q 7 6
♣
K Q 9 8
E 3♥; NS 4♣; NS 2N; W 2♥; EW 1♦; Par +130
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♣× N ♦ A −1 100 1.00 0.00 3-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 ♥ W ♠ 3 3 140 0.00 1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Shepard-Turner
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul
♠
Q J 2
♥
K Q 8 6 5
♦
Q 6 2
♣
Q 3
♠
10 6 4
♥
9 3
♦
A 10 9 3
♣
A 10 9 6
N
W
E
S
♠
A 9 8 3
♥
A 10 7 4 2
♦
J 4
♣
K 7
12 8 12 8
♠
K 7 5
♥
J
♦
K 8 7 5
♣
J 8 5 4 2
EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 2♥; W 2♦; E 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −120
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♦ N ♦ 4 −1 100 1.00 0.00 3-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
2 ♦ N ♠ 3 −2 200 0.00 1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Shepard-Turner
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
9 3
♥
A K 8 5
♦
J 7 6 5
♣
Q 9 8
♠
10 8 5 2
♥
9
♦
A K Q 4
♣
A 7 5 4
N
W
E
S
♠
A 7 6
♥
Q 10 7 4 3
♦
10 3 2
♣
3 2
10 13 6 11
♠
K Q J 4
♥
J 6 2
♦
9 8
♣
K J 10 6
NS 2N; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +120
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT N ♥ 4 2 120 0.50 0.50 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
1 NT N ♦ 10 2 120 0.50 0.50 3-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
A 3
♥
Q J 7
♦
A K Q 6 2
♣
A K 10
♠
8 2
♥
6 5 4 2
♦
8 3
♣
Q 8 6 4 3
N
W
E
S
♠
K Q 10 9 6 5
♥
A K 3
♦
J 7 5
♣
9
23 2 13 2
♠
J 7 4
♥
10 9 8
♦
10 9 4
♣
J 7 5 2
N 4N; N 4♦; S 2N; S 3♦; N 2♣; NS 1♠; NS 1♥; S 1♣; Par +430
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT N ♥ K 4 180 1.00 0.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
3 ♥ S ♠ 4 −3 150 0.00 1.00 3-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul
♠
K 8 6 5
♥
7 2
♦
J 10 9 5 3
♣
9 7
♠
10 9 4 2
♥
J 6
♦
8 6 4
♣
K Q 3 2
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 3
♥
Q 9 5
♦
A K 7
♣
A J 10 8 6
4 6 16 14
♠
A J 7
♥
A K 10 8 4 3
♦
Q 2
♣
5 4
NS 2♠; NS 2♥; EW 1N; NS 2♦; EW 2♣; Par +110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ S ♣ K 2 110 1.00 0.00 3-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♣ E ♥ A −1 100 0.00 1.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
Board 24 West Deals None Vul
♠
A 7 5
♥
A 8 5
♦
J 10 6 4 3
♣
8 6
♠
K J 8 6
♥
Q 9 6 2
♦
7 5
♣
A 10 3
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 10 9 3
♥
K J 7
♦
A Q 8
♣
K Q 5
9 10 17 4
♠
4 2
♥
10 4 3
♦
K 9 2
♣
J 9 7 4 2
EW 4♠; EW 3♥; E 2N; W 1N; EW 2♣; EW 1♦; Par −420
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT E ♣ 4 4 180 1.00 0.00 3-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ E ♣ 9 4 420 0.00 1.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
8 5
♥
A K 10 9 7 4 3
♦
7 4 3
♣
3
♠
A K 9 6 4 3
♥
—
♦
A K J 6
♣
9 5 4
N
W
E
S
♠
Q J 7
♥
8 2
♦
Q 10 9 8 2
♣
J 8 2
7 15 6 12
♠
10 2
♥
Q J 6 5
♦
5
♣
A K Q 10 7 6
EW 4♠; NS 4♥; EW 3♦; NS 2♣; Par −100: NS 5♥×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♠ Q 4 420 0.50 0.50 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Rafenstein-Adair
4 ♥ N ♦ 8 4 420 0.50 0.50 3-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008
