To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session November 13, 2013
Scores after 5 rounds Average: 25.0 Section E
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
5 57.00 28.50 B 1 1 0.60(A) Thomas Ciolli - Jim Ciolli
2 53.00 26.50 C 2 2 1 0.42(A) Tom Turner - Dave Cleary
1 52.00 26.00 B Judi Bunch - Hiroko Kitamura
4 49.00 24.50 C Cheryl Rankin - Donna Rafenstein
3 31.00 15.50 C Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter
6 58.00 29.00 A NE John Lagodimos - Kathie Angione
Board 1 North Deals None Vul
♠
A K Q 5 3
♥
J 8 6 5
♦
7 3
♣
9 6
♠
J
♥
K Q 10 3
♦
Q J 6
♣
Q 10 7 3 2
N
W
E
S
♠
9 8 7 6 4
♥
4
♦
K 9 5 2
♣
A J 4
10 11 8 11
♠
10 2
♥
A 9 7 2
♦
A 10 8 4
♣
K 8 5
NS 2♠; NS 2♥; EW 2♣; EW 1♦; Par +100: EW 3♣×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ S ♠ J 2 110 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
1 ♠ N ♠ 4 −1 50 0.50 1.50 4-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 2-Turner-Cleary
2 ♥ N ♣ 4 −1 50 0.50 1.50 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
5
♥
5 3 2
♦
A K 10 2
♣
A Q 9 4 3
♠
K J 10 3 2
♥
Q J 4
♦
Q J 5 3
♣
K
N
W
E
S
♠
A Q 9 7
♥
A 10 9 8
♦
8 6
♣
J 8 2
13 13 11 3
♠
8 6 4
♥
K 7 6
♦
9 7 4
♣
10 7 6 5
EW 3♠; EW 2♥; NS 3♣; EW 1N; NS 1♦; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠ W ♦ A 3 140 1.00 1.00 4-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 2-Turner-Cleary
3 ♠ W ♦ A 3 140 1.00 1.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠ W ♦ A 3 140 1.00 1.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
K 10 7 5 3
♥
9 8 6
♦
7 5 2
♣
8 5
♠
A 6 2
♥
K 3
♦
Q J 9
♣
K 10 9 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 9 8
♥
J 10 7 5 4 2
♦
8 4
♣
Q J
3 13 6 18
♠
J 4
♥
A Q
♦
A K 10 6 3
♣
A 7 6 3
EW 2♥; NS 2♦; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; Par −100: NS 2♠×−1; NS 3♦×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ E ♦ A −2 200 2.00 0.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♣ W ♦ 6 −1 100 1.00 1.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
2 ♥ E ♦ A 3 140 0.00 2.00 4-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 2-Turner-Cleary
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul
♠
Q 5 3
♥
A Q J 6 5 3
♦
A J 7
♣
8
♠
A 8 2
♥
10 9
♦
K 10 5
♣
K 7 6 4 3
N
W
E
S
♠
K J 10 9 6
♥
4
♦
9 6 4 3
♣
J 10 2
14 10 5 11
♠
7 4
♥
K 8 7 2
♦
Q 8 2
♣
A Q 9 5
NS 5♥; NS 2N; EW 1♠; NS 1♦; Par +650
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♥ 4 5 650 1.50 0.50 4-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 2-Turner-Cleary
4 ♥ N ♠ J 5 650 1.50 0.50 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ N ♠ J 4 620 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
J 8 7 6 2
♥
10 6 3
♦
K 9 4 3
♣
3
♠
10 5 3
♥
A 9
♦
7 6 5
♣
A Q 9 7 6
N
W
E
S
♠
K Q 4
♥
J 5 4
♦
A Q 2
♣
K 8 5 2
4 10 15 11
♠
A 9
♥
K Q 8 7 2
♦
J 10 8
♣
J 10 4
E 3N; EW 4♣; W 2N; EW 1♠; EW 1♦; Par −400
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♥ 7 −1 50 2.00 0.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT E ♥ 8 3 400 1.00 1.00 4-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 2-Turner-Cleary
3 NT E ♥ 7 4 430 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
10
♥
6 4
♦
K 10 6 5
♣
A Q J 8 7 3
♠
J 9 2
♥
A Q 10 3
♦
A Q 2
♣
6 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠
A Q 6 4
♥
K J 9
♦
9 8 7
♣
K 10 9
10 13 13 4
♠
K 8 7 5 3
♥
8 7 5 2
♦
J 4 3
♣
5
EW 3N; EW 2♠; EW 1♥; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −500: NS 4♣×−3; NS 4♦×−3
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♠ 10 −3 300 2.00 0.00 4-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT E ♠ 5 −1 100 1.00 1.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 NT E ♠ 5 4 630 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Turner-Cleary
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul
♠
K 9 8 5
♥
K 10 7 4
♦
A K J 2
♣
3
♠
A 10 2
♥
3 2
♦
6 5 3
♣
A J 10 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠
J 7 6 3
♥
9 8 6
♦
Q 9 7
♣
Q 8 6
14 9 5 12
♠
Q 4
♥
A Q J 5
♦
10 8 4
♣
K 9 7 5
NS 4♥; NS 2N; NS 3♦; NS 1♠; S 1♣; Par +620
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♦ 7 5 650 2.00 0.00 4-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ N ♥ 8 4 620 0.50 1.50 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
4 ♥ N ♠ 3 4 620 0.50 1.50 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Turner-Cleary
Board 8 West Deals None Vul
♠
J 5
♥
K J 9 4
♦
K J 9
♣
A 4 3 2
♠
Q 10 8 6
♥
8 2
♦
A Q 2
♣
K J 9 7
N
W
E
S
♠
A K
♥
10 6 5
♦
10 8 4 3
♣
Q 8 6 5
13 12 9 6
♠
9 7 4 3 2
♥
A Q 7 3
♦
7 6 5
♣
10
NS 3♥; NS 2♠; EW 2♣; NS 1♦; Par +140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♣ W ♥ 2 −1 50 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Turner-Cleary
2 NT N ♣ 5 −2 100 1.00 1.00 4-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
1 NT E ♠ 3 2 120 0.00 2.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
A K
♥
Q 9 6 4 2
♦
A Q 7 5 4
♣
10
♠
10 5 2
♥
J 8
♦
K 9 3
♣
Q 8 7 5 2
N
W
E
S
♠
7 3
♥
K 10 3
♦
10 8 6 2
♣
A 9 4 3
15 6 7 12
♠
Q J 9 8 6 4
♥
A 7 5
♦
J
♣
K J 6
NS 5♠; NS 4N; NS 4♥; NS 3♦; NS 1♣; Par +450
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♠ 7 5 450 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Turner-Cleary
4 ♥ N ♣ A 4 420 1.00 1.00 4-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ N ♣ A −1 50 0.00 2.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul
♠
3 2
♥
Q 9 2
♦
K 8 6 4
♣
Q J 9 6
♠
Q 4
♥
K J 7
♦
Q 10 9 5
♣
10 7 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠
A J 10 5
♥
8 5 4 3
♦
A 7 3 2
♣
K
8 8 12 12
♠
K 9 8 7 6
♥
A 10 6
♦
J
♣
A 8 5 3
NS 2♠; NS 1N; NS 2♣; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; Par +110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ S ♦ 10 2 110 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Turner-Cleary
1 NT N ♦ 2 −1 100 1.00 1.00 4-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♦ N ♥ 5 −3 300 0.00 2.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
Board 11 South Deals None Vul
♠
5 2
♥
A K J 8
♦
Q 8 7 5 2
♣
5 2
♠
Q 9 4
♥
Q 10 9 6
♦
A K
♣
K J 8 7
N
W
E
S
♠
A J 8 7 6
♥
5 4 2
♦
6 4 3
♣
9 3
10 15 5 10
♠
K 10 3
♥
7 3
♦
J 10 9
♣
A Q 10 6 4
EW 2♠; NS 3♦; S 2♣; NS 1♥; N 1♣; Par +100: EW 3♠×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♣ W ♥ A −3 150 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♠ W ♥ A −1 50 1.00 1.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
2 ♠ W ♥ A 2 110 0.00 2.00 2-Turner-Cleary vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul
♠
A Q
♥
K 5
♦
8 6 4 3
♣
K 10 9 6 4
♠
10 9 8 6 5
♥
J 8
♦
A Q J 7 5
♣
3
N
W
E
S
♠
K 3 2
♥
Q 10 9 7
♦
K 10
♣
A 7 5 2
12 8 12 8
♠
J 7 4
♥
A 6 4 3 2
♦
9 2
♣
Q J 8
EW 2♠; EW 2♦; NS 2♣; Par −110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT N ♣ 2 2 120 2.00 0.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
2 ♦ W ♥ K −1 50 1.00 1.00 2-Turner-Cleary vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♥ S ♣ 7 −3 300 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul
♠
J 9 7 6 4
♥
Q 10 3
♦
K 10
♣
Q 7 3
♠
10
♥
8 7 4 2
♦
9 4 3
♣
J 10 9 8 6
N
W
E
S
♠
A Q 8 5 3 2
♥
6
♦
8 6 5 2
♣
K 4
8 1 9 22
♠
K
♥
A K J 9 5
♦
A Q J 7
♣
A 5 2
N 5N; NS 5♥; S 4N; N 3♠; NS 4♦; S 2♠; NS 3♣; Par +660
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠× E ♥ A −3 800 1.50 0.50 2-Turner-Cleary vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
2 ♠× E ♥ A −3 800 1.50 0.50 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ S ♠ 10 4 620 0.00 2.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
Board 14 East Deals None Vul
♠
K 8 7 5
♥
J 10 4 2
♦
J 9 6
♣
10 6
♠
Q J 10 4
♥
8
♦
K 8 4 3 2
♣
K 8 2
N
W
E
S
♠
6
♥
A K 7 6
♦
Q 10
♣
A Q J 9 7 3
5 9 16 10
♠
A 9 3 2
♥
Q 9 5 3
♦
A 7 5
♣
5 4
EW 3N; EW 5♣; EW 4♦; EW 2♠; EW 2♥; Par −400
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥× S ♣ K −1 100 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT E ♥ 5 3 400 0.50 1.50 2-Turner-Cleary vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
3 NT E ♥ 3 3 400 0.50 1.50 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul
♠
Q 10 2
♥
K Q 7 5 4
♦
7 6 2
♣
4 2
♠
9 7
♥
3
♦
K 9 8 5
♣
K Q 9 7 5 3
N
W
E
S
♠
K J 8 4
♥
A 8 6
♦
A Q J 3
♣
J 8
7 8 16 9
♠
A 6 5 3
♥
J 10 9 2
♦
10 4
♣
A 10 6
EW 5♦; EW 5♣; EW 2♠; EW 1N; NS 1♥; Par −400
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♥ J −2 100 1.50 0.50 2-Turner-Cleary vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♠ W ♥ K −2 100 1.50 0.50 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♣ E ♥ J 5 150 0.00 2.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul
♠
A Q 8
♥
—
♦
Q 10 8 7 6 3
♣
K 10 3 2
♠
K 5 4 3 2
♥
Q 7 2
♦
A J 2
♣
A 4
N
W
E
S
♠
9 7 6
♥
K J 10 9 4
♦
5
♣
9 8 7 5
11 14 4 11
♠
J 10
♥
A 8 6 5 3
♦
K 9 4
♣
Q J 6
NS 3N; NS 5♦; NS 3♣; EW 1♠; W 1♥; Par +400
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♦ N ♠ 7 4 130 1.00 1.00 2-Turner-Cleary vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 ♦ N ♠ 9 4 130 1.00 1.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♦ N ♠ 10 4 130 1.00 1.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
Board 17 North Deals None Vul
♠
10 7 3
♥
J 10 4
♦
9 8
♣
A Q 7 4 3
♠
Q J 6 5 2
♥
3
♦
K Q J 4 2
♣
K 8
N
W
E
S
♠
A K 9
♥
Q 9 7 6 2
♦
A 10 6
♣
J 2
7 12 14 7
♠
8 4
♥
A K 8 5
♦
7 5 3
♣
10 9 6 5
EW 4♠; EW 4♦; NS 3♣; NS 1♥; Par −300: NS 5♣×−2
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ W ♥ J 4 420 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
4 ♠ W ♣ A 5 450 1.00 1.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
3 NT E ♥ 5 5 460 0.00 2.00 2-Turner-Cleary vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
A Q 9 6 4 2
♥
K 6
♦
K J 2
♣
A 7
♠
K 10 3
♥
Q J 8 5 4 2
♦
5
♣
J 5 2
N
W
E
S
♠
5
♥
10 9 7 3
♦
Q 10 7 4
♣
Q 10 8 6
17 7 4 12
♠
J 8 7
♥
A
♦
A 9 8 6 3
♣
K 9 4 3
NS 7♠; NS 6N; NS 6♦; NS 5♣; Par +2210
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 ♠ N ♥ 10 6 1430 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
4 ♠ N ♥ 10 5 650 1.00 1.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♥ W ♠ A −2 100 0.00 2.00 2-Turner-Cleary vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
6 3 2
♥
Q 10 8 5
♦
A 6 5 2
♣
A 2
♠
Q 7 4
♥
9 2
♦
K Q J 9 8 7 4
♣
J
N
W
E
S
♠
A K J 8
♥
A J
♦
10 3
♣
K Q 9 7 3
10 9 18 3
♠
10 9 5
♥
K 7 6 4 3
♦
—
♣
10 8 6 5 4
EW 3♠; EW 4♦; NS 2♥; EW 1N; E 2♣; W 1♣; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♥ 4 −2 200 2.00 0.00 2-Turner-Cleary vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 NT E ♥ 4 −1 100 1.00 1.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
5 ♦ W ♣ A 5 600 0.00 2.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul
♠
10 9 5 3 2
♥
J 8 6 2
♦
K 5
♣
J 7
♠
Q
♥
A Q 10 9 3
♦
8 3
♣
K Q 10 5 3
N
W
E
S
♠
A K 8 7 4
♥
K 5 4
♦
J 10
♣
8 6 4
5 13 11 11
♠
J 6
♥
7
♦
A Q 9 7 6 4 2
♣
A 9 2
EW 3♥; EW 2♠; EW 3♣; NS 2♦; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♦ K −1 100 2.00 0.00 2-Turner-Cleary vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
5 ♦ S ♠ Q −3 300 1.00 1.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Bunch-Kitamura
5 ♦× S ♠ Q −2 500 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
2
♥
K J 7 2
♦
K 8 7 6 3
♣
8 4 3
♠
8 7 4 3
♥
Q 6 3
♦
5
♣
A K Q 6 5
N
W
E
S
♠
K Q 10 9
♥
9 8
♦
A Q 10 9 2
♣
9 2
7 11 11 11
♠
A J 6 5
♥
A 10 5 4
♦
J 4
♣
J 10 7
EW 3♠; EW 2N; EW 2♣; NS 1♥; EW 1♦; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ E ♣ 6 −2 100 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 ♣ W ♠ 2 −1 50 1.00 1.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
2 ♠ E ♦ J 2 110 0.00 2.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Turner-Cleary
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
9 8 6 5 3 2
♥
A 8 2
♦
7 3
♣
Q 3
♠
4
♥
Q J 9 3
♦
10 9 6 4
♣
J 10 7 2
N
W
E
S
♠
A K J 10
♥
K 7 6
♦
A J
♣
A 9 5 4
6 4 20 10
♠
Q 7
♥
10 5 4
♦
K Q 8 5 2
♣
K 8 6
E 4♥; EW 3N; W 3♥; EW 4♣; EW 2♠; EW 2♦; Par −620
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♦ 5 −1 100 2.00 0.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
2 NT E ♦ 2 2 120 1.00 1.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Turner-Cleary
2 NT E ♦ 5 4 180 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul
♠
Q 3 2
♥
A K 9 4
♦
9 8 4 2
♣
J 8
♠
A 10
♥
8 6 5 3
♦
7 6 3
♣
A Q 3 2
N
W
E
S
♠
J 7 5 4
♥
J 10 2
♦
Q 10
♣
K 6 5 4
10 10 7 13
♠
K 9 8 6
♥
Q 7
♦
A K J 5
♣
10 9 7
NS 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 4♦; NS 2N; NS 1♣; Par +140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♦ S ♥ 3 4 130 1.50 0.50 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
2 ♦ S ♠ A 4 130 1.50 0.50 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Turner-Cleary
1 NT N ♣ 4 2 120 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
Board 24 West Deals None Vul
♠
8 5
♥
J 5 2
♦
10 6
♣
Q 9 7 5 4 2
♠
K J 7 3 2
♥
A K 7 3
♦
9
♣
K J 3
N
W
E
S
♠
A Q 9 6 4
♥
Q 8
♦
A K 5 2
♣
8 6
3 15 15 7
♠
10
♥
10 9 6 4
♦
Q J 8 7 4 3
♣
A 10
EW 6N; EW 6♠; EW 5♥; EW 2♦; EW 2♣; Par −990
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♠ W ♣ 7 6 480 1.50 0.50 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
4 ♠ W ♦ 10 6 480 1.50 0.50 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
6 ♠ W ♣ Q 6 980 0.00 2.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Turner-Cleary
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
8 6 5 2
♥
7
♦
A Q 3
♣
J 6 5 3 2
♠
Q J 7
♥
A J 10 9
♦
J 5
♣
A K 7 4
N
W
E
S
♠
10 4 3
♥
Q 5 3
♦
10 9 8 6 2
♣
Q 9
7 16 4 13
♠
A K 9
♥
K 8 6 4 2
♦
K 7 4
♣
10 8
EW 1N; NS 1♠; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −90
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT S 1 90 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
1 NT W ♣ 3 2 120 1.00 1.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Rankin-Rafenstein
1 NT W ♥ 7 3 150 0.00 2.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Turner-Cleary
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008
