| 1 |
♠KQT85
♥84
♦J8642
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣6 ♥3 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 1.50 0.50 4♦ S ♥T 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Rankin-Adair
130 1.50 0.50 3♦ N +1 ♥A 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 4-Turner-Shepard
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♣5 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Ciolli-Ciolli
|
| 2 |
♠KJ8
♥AJ73
♦T83
♣K97
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣0 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 6♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥4 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 4-Turner-Shepard
400 0.50 1.50 3N E ♥5 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Ciolli-Ciolli
400 0.50 1.50 5♣ W ♦8 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Rankin-Adair
|
| 3 |
♠AJ
♥J754
♦9865
♣Q76
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 1.50 0.50 1N E ♣4 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Rankin-Adair
90 1.50 0.50 2♦ E ♣4 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Ciolli-Ciolli
120 0.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♣4 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 4-Turner-Shepard
|
| 4 |
♠K5
♥985
♦QJ752
♣843
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ E ♠Q 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Etzel-Cleary
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ E ♠Q 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
650 0.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♠Q 4-Turner-Shepard vs 1-Rankin-Adair
|
| 5 |
♠AQ6
♥J6
♦AQT6
♣T984
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1/2♠ 1/2NT ♦6 ♥5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N W ♥J 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Etzel-Cleary
100 1.00 1.00 2N N -1 ♠7 4-Turner-Shepard vs 1-Rankin-Adair
200 0.00 2.00 3♦ N -2 ♣Q 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
|
| 6 |
♠AK87
♥Q6
♦KJT83
♣54
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦4/5 ♥4 ♠3 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 1.50 0.50 3N W -3 ♦J 4-Turner-Shepard vs 1-Rankin-Adair
300 1.50 0.50 2♥ W -3 ♠A 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
100 0.00 2.00 3♣ E -1 ♦5 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Etzel-Cleary
|
| 7 |
♠AQT82
♥AKJ84
♦T5
♣T
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: -/1♣ 1♥ 4♠ ♣6/7 ♦5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
790 2.00 0.00 4♠* N ♣4 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 7-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Rankin-Adair
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ N ♣K 5-Etzel-Cleary vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
|
| 8 |
♠K93
♥AT2
♦KT965
♣KQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4/3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♥J 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
450 1.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♦4 7-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Rankin-Adair
430 0.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♦4 5-Etzel-Cleary vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
|
| 9 |
♠92
♥AKQ84
♦AQ5
♣Q86
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♠A 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦4 5-Etzel-Cleary vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦3 7-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Rankin-Adair
|
| 10 |
♠A32
♥AQJ9742
♦84
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ N ♦A 5-Etzel-Cleary vs 7-Ciolli-Ciolli
100 0.50 1.50 5♠ S -1 ♣A 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Turner-Shepard
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♥5 1-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
|
| 11 |
♠A76543
♥8
♦JT94
♣AT
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♦* W -1 ♥8 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Turner-Shepard
100 1.00 1.00 2♠ N -2 ♥J 5-Etzel-Cleary vs 7-Ciolli-Ciolli
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ W ♣A 1-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
|
| 12 |
♠876
♥AJ
♦AKQ76
♣982
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3NT ♥4 ♠6 |
| EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ N ♥K 1-Rankin-Adair vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
100 1.00 1.00 3N S -1 ♠J 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Turner-Shepard
200 0.00 2.00 3♣ S -2 ♠J 5-Etzel-Cleary vs 7-Ciolli-Ciolli
|
| 13 |
♠K8742
♥5
♦9764
♣Q64
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥5 ♠3 NT1 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N W ♠4 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
660 0.50 1.50 4N W +1 ♣4 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Etzel-Cleary
660 0.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♥5 7-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Turner-Shepard
|
| 14 |
♠Q3
♥AT75
♦J2
♣A9832
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ S +1 ♥K 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Etzel-Cleary
50 0.50 1.50 3♦ S -1 ♠6 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
50 0.50 1.50 3♦ S -1 ♥K 7-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Turner-Shepard
|
| 15 |
♠8762
♥Q96
♦Q762
♣85
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ W ♦Q 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
130 1.00 1.00 3♣ W +1 ♦2 7-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Turner-Shepard
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ E +1 ♦A 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Etzel-Cleary
|
| 16 |
♠J742
♥AT7
♦QJ864
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
70 2.00 0.00 1♦ N ♣5 1-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Etzel-Cleary
110 0.50 1.50 2♣ W +1 ♦A 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Turner-Shepard
110 0.50 1.50 7-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
|
| 17 |
♠T4
♥AK9862
♦63
♣Q76
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦1 ♠5 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 6♦ 2♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 7-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
150 1.00 1.00 3♦ E +2 ♥4 1-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Etzel-Cleary
170 0.00 2.00 4♦ W +2 ♥K 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Turner-Shepard
|
| 18 |
♠A97
♥862
♦J952
♣743
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥0 ♠5 NT1 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 3♣ E +2 ♠K 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Turner-Shepard
150 1.50 0.50 7-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
430 0.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♠Q 1-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Etzel-Cleary
|
| 19 |
♠J84
♥KQT85
♦T654
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 6♣ E -1 ♥3 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 7-Ciolli-Ciolli
100 1.50 0.50 5♣ E -1 ♠T 1-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
150 0.00 2.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 5-Etzel-Cleary
|
| 20 |
♠QJ7
♥AJ5
♦QT6
♣T654
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2/3♥ 2NT ♠4/5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♣6 1-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
100 1.50 0.50 4-Turner-Shepard vs 5-Etzel-Cleary
400 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -4 ♠A 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 7-Ciolli-Ciolli
|
| 21 |
♠J86
♥Q3
♦T8764
♣J83
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
| EW: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣9 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 7-Ciolli-Ciolli
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ E ♣T 1-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
140 0.00 2.00 4-Turner-Shepard vs 5-Etzel-Cleary
|