| 1 |
♠A2
♥432
♦754
♣AQT92
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
| EW: 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ E ♣3 3-Dusharme-Vegter vs 7-Hunter-Hunter
170 2.00 1.00 2♥ E +2 ♠4 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠4 5-Angione-Crail vs 6-Cleary-Hurley
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠4 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 1-Hale-Rogers
|
| 2 |
♠AQ74
♥AT52
♦Q
♣KT54
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N S ♠3 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme
150 2.00 1.00 2N S +1 ♦3 3-Dusharme-Vegter vs 7-Hunter-Hunter
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ N ♠J 5-Angione-Crail vs 6-Cleary-Hurley
200 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♣Q 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 1-Hale-Rogers
|
| 3 |
♠Q952
♥J8
♦KT8
♣T972
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♠2 3-Dusharme-Vegter vs 7-Hunter-Hunter
100 2.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♣T 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme
100 2.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♣T 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 1-Hale-Rogers
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W ♣T 5-Angione-Crail vs 6-Cleary-Hurley
|
| 4 |
♠T6
♥K2
♦J986
♣98543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♦3 3-Dusharme-Vegter vs 5-Angione-Crail
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ E ♦T 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
600 1.00 2.00 3N W ♦6 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 1-Hale-Rogers
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ E ♠5 6-Cleary-Hurley vs 7-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 5 |
♠AQ42
♥K
♦KQJ96
♣Q83
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♠ S ♣A 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
50 2.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 ♠T 6-Cleary-Hurley vs 7-Hunter-Hunter
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♣A 3-Dusharme-Vegter vs 5-Angione-Crail
130 0.00 3.00 2♣ W +2 ♦K 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 1-Hale-Rogers
|
| 6 |
♠64
♥7
♦K64
♣KQJ8743
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
| EW: 5♦ 4♥ 6♠ 4NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.83 0.17 4♠ E +1 ♥Q 6-Cleary-Hurley vs 7-Hunter-Hunter
680 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +2 ♣T 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 1-Hale-Rogers
1430 0.17 2.83 6♠ E ♣5 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
|
| 7 |
♠J94
♥94
♦KQ5
♣J9842
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
| EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N S ♣3 7-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Hale-Rogers
500 2.00 1.00 2♠* E -2 ♥A 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 6-Cleary-Hurley
100 1.00 2.00 4♣ N -1 ♠A 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 3-Dusharme-Vegter
400 0.00 3.00 3N N -4 ♠7 5-Angione-Crail vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
|
| 8 |
♠T7
♥9854
♦K65
♣AT65
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
| EW: 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♦A 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 6-Cleary-Hurley
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♦A 7-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Hale-Rogers
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 5-Angione-Crail vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♦K 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 3-Dusharme-Vegter
|
| 9 |
♠Q974
♥64
♦KQJT
♣K52
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 1♠ N -2 ♦A 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 3-Dusharme-Vegter
120 2.00 1.00 2N W ♦K 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 6-Cleary-Hurley
600 1.00 2.00 3N W 5-Angione-Crail vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
630 0.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♥T 7-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Hale-Rogers
|
| 10 |
♠AQ6
♥983
♦A643
♣JT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 1N E -3 ♦T 1-Hale-Rogers vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
100 1.50 1.50 2N E -1 ♦7 6-Cleary-Hurley vs 3-Dusharme-Vegter
100 1.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♦J 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme
150 0.00 3.00 2N W +1 ♣J 5-Angione-Crail vs 7-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 11 |
♠A863
♥T3
♦AQJ92
♣AT
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 6/5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 6/5NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥3 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♦4 6-Cleary-Hurley vs 3-Dusharme-Vegter
460 2.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♥6 1-Hale-Rogers vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
430 1.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♣9 5-Angione-Crail vs 7-Hunter-Hunter
100 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♠2 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme
|
| 12 |
♠T73
♥84
♦J872
♣8732
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣6/5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♠A 5-Angione-Crail vs 7-Hunter-Hunter
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♠T 1-Hale-Rogers vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♠T 6-Cleary-Hurley vs 3-Dusharme-Vegter
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♦8 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme
|
| 13 |
♠A65
♥7642
♦85
♣QT64
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N W ♣4 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 5-Angione-Crail
660 1.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♥5 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 3-Dusharme-Vegter
660 1.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♥5 6-Cleary-Hurley vs 1-Hale-Rogers
660 1.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♣5 7-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme
|
| 14 |
♠A7
♥K864
♦KT82
♣K87
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♦ 1/2♥ 4/5♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦4 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 3-Dusharme-Vegter
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ S ♦9 7-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme
110 1.00 2.00 3♣ S ♦9 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 5-Angione-Crail
100 0.00 3.00 5♦ N -2 ♥3 6-Cleary-Hurley vs 1-Hale-Rogers
|
| 15 |
♠QJT742
♥8
♦Q95
♣984
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT5 |
| EW: 4♦ 5/4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 ♥Q 6-Cleary-Hurley vs 1-Hale-Rogers
170 2.00 1.00 2♥ W +2 ♠7 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 5-Angione-Crail
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ W ♠A 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 3-Dusharme-Vegter
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ W ♣5 7-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme
|
| 16 |
♠542
♥QT
♦Q763
♣JT82
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 1N S -2 ♥3 1-Hale-Rogers vs 5-Angione-Crail
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♦7 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 6-Cleary-Hurley
170 1.00 2.00 2♥ W +2 ♣J 3-Dusharme-Vegter vs 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme
180 0.00 3.00 1N W +3 ♦3 7-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
|
| 17 |
♠95
♥J83
♦Q74
♣K9732
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦4/5 ♥5/6 ♠4/5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♦Q 7-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
100 2.00 1.00 2N E -2 ♠4 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 6-Cleary-Hurley
100 2.00 1.00 3♣* E -1 1-Hale-Rogers vs 5-Angione-Crail
50 0.00 3.00 2♥ W -1 ♦Q 3-Dusharme-Vegter vs 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme
|
| 18 |
♠2
♥KJT3
♦A84
♣QJT98
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠3 NT4/5 |
| EW: 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♦7 1-Hale-Rogers vs 5-Angione-Crail
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♣7 3-Dusharme-Vegter vs 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme
50 2.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 ♣Q 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 6-Cleary-Hurley
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ E ♣7 7-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
|
| 19 |
♠AQ532
♥962
♦JT93
♣Q
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♣A 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 5-Angione-Crail
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ N ♣A 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 6-Cleary-Hurley
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ N ♣A 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 7-Hunter-Hunter
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ N 1-Hale-Rogers vs 3-Dusharme-Vegter
|
| 20 |
♠JT85
♥Q653
♦Q873
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 1-Hale-Rogers vs 3-Dusharme-Vegter
150 2.00 1.00 2♣ N +3 ♦T 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 5-Angione-Crail
110 0.50 2.50 3♣ N ♦T 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 6-Cleary-Hurley
110 0.50 2.50 2♣ N +1 ♦T 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 7-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 21 |
♠Q8532
♥A873
♦K98
♣8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣2 NT5 |
| EW: 5♣ ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♦4 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 6-Cleary-Hurley
150 1.50 1.50 4♣ W +1 ♦A 8-Cogdill-Piazzoni vs 7-Hunter-Hunter
150 1.50 1.50 4♣ W +1 ♣Q 1-Hale-Rogers vs 3-Dusharme-Vegter
550 0.00 3.00 5♣* E ♥A 4-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 5-Angione-Crail
|