| 1 |
♠AK85
♥KQ9
♦K965
♣95
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 0.50 0.50 3N* N -4 ♣A 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
800 0.50 0.50 3N* N -4 ♣A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Piazzoni-Hurley
|
| 2 |
♠8652
♥Q943
♦AKQJ
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.00 0.00 2♣ S +1 ♠A 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
100 0.00 1.00 2♦ N -1 ♠9 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Piazzoni-Hurley
|
| 3 |
♠43
♥AKT642
♦Q2
♣AQ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/3♦ 5♥ 2/5NT ♣6 ♠6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥0 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠2 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
200 0.00 1.00 2♥ N +3 ♥5 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Piazzoni-Hurley
|
| 4 |
♠-
♥K6543
♦A63
♣QJ972
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♦ -/1NT ♣4/5 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT5/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.00 0.00 2N W ♥2 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Piazzoni-Hurley
400 0.00 1.00 3N N -4 ♦T 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 5 |
♠JT
♥A84
♦9872
♣K876
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 1.00 0.00 1♠ W ♣6 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
140 0.00 1.00 1♠ W +2 ♠3 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 6 |
♠A7432
♥T6
♦Q7643
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣2 NT6 |
| EW: 4♣ 1NT ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 1.00 0.00 1N W ♥T 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
600 0.00 1.00 5♣ E ♦A 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 7 |
♠AQT5
♥QJ52
♦KJ2
♣K4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♣3 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
600 0.00 1.00 3N N ♥4 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 8 |
♠J82
♥AJT7
♦9872
♣92
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 0.50 0.50 2N W ♥9 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
120 0.50 0.50 1N W +1 ♥7 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 9 |
♠9
♥AT752
♦Q42
♣AQT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♥ 1/4NT ♦6/5 ♠5/4 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♣8 2-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Piazzoni-Hurley
420 0.00 1.00 4♥ N ♠8 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 10 |
♠985
♥K984
♦T87
♣542
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♠ 5/1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.00 0.00 3♥ N -2 ♣K 2-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Piazzoni-Hurley
600 0.00 1.00 5♣ W ♦T 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 11 |
♠8
♥KQT42
♦Q9
♣QJT65
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.00 0.00 4♥ N ♣7 2-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Piazzoni-Hurley
170 0.00 1.00 3♥ N +1 ♦8 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 12 |
♠AQ
♥QT8
♦QJ754
♣QT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠6 |
| EW: 3♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.00 0.00 3♥ S ♠9 2-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Piazzoni-Hurley
110 0.00 1.00 2♦ S +1 ♠2 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 13 |
♠982
♥2
♦AT543
♣KQ52
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT5 |
| EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣3 ♦3 ♠4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 0.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♦4 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
100 0.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♣K 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Piazzoni-Hurley
|
| 14 |
♠QJ
♥K962
♦K762
♣K72
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.00 0.00 2N W ♦2 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Piazzoni-Hurley
400 0.00 1.00 3N W ♦2 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
|
| 15 |
♠K97
♥KJ832
♦K43
♣43
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2/3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 0.00 2♥ N -1 ♣9 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
110 0.00 1.00 2♦ E +1 ♣8 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Piazzoni-Hurley
|
| 16 |
♠AQ63
♥Q4
♦QT5432
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.00 0.00 3♣ W ♦5 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
140 0.00 1.00 3♥ W ♣8 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Piazzoni-Hurley
|
| 17 |
♠T872
♥J983
♦A92
♣T2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 |
| EW: 3/2♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠5/4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.00 0.00 3♣ W ♥3 1-Piazzoni-Hurley vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
120 0.00 1.00 1N W +1 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 18 |
♠A94
♥Q5
♦AQJT5
♣K62
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 1.00 0.00 2N N +2 ♥6 1-Piazzoni-Hurley vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
140 0.00 1.00 3♠ W ♦Q 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 19 |
♠974
♥AKJ2
♦Q62
♣K97
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 1.00 0.00 1♠ S ♦4 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
50 0.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♦2 1-Piazzoni-Hurley vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
|
| 20 |
♠KJT732
♥K5
♦Q65
♣73
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
| EW: 6♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 0.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♣7 1-Piazzoni-Hurley vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
100 0.50 0.50 6♣ W -1 ♠7 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
|