| 1 |
♠973
♥K865
♦74
♣KJ42
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 0.50 2♥ S ♠A 6-Turner-Cleary vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
110 1.50 0.50 2♥ S ♣3 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ E ♣9 5-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Kitamura-Zaman
|
| 2 |
♠AJ75
♥T9876
♦A4
♣98
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♥ N -1 ♣K 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
110 1.00 1.00 3♣ E ♥5 5-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Kitamura-Zaman
130 0.00 2.00 2♣ E +2 ♦3 6-Turner-Cleary vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 3 |
♠KJ7532
♥AK8
♦32
♣A4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4/5♥ 4/5♠ 1/3NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ N ♣2 6-Turner-Cleary vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
230 1.00 1.00 3♠ N +3 ♥J 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -2 ♣2 5-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Kitamura-Zaman
|
| 4 |
♠3
♥AT752
♦AJ852
♣74
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.50 0.50 4♥ S ♠2 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
620 1.50 0.50 4♥ N ♣K 5-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Kitamura-Zaman
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ E +1 ♥J 6-Turner-Cleary vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 5 |
♠J986542
♥KT
♦T42
♣8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♦ W -1 ♣7 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Adair
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 ♥5 6-Turner-Cleary vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠A 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Kitamura-Zaman
|
| 6 |
♠K98
♥KQ63
♦AKT9
♣K8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣3 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Adair
210 1.00 1.00 2N N +3 ♠4 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Kitamura-Zaman
100 0.00 2.00 3N S -2 ♣2 6-Turner-Cleary vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
|
| 7 |
♠52
♥QJ74
♦A653
♣842
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 2.00 0.00 Pass Out 6-Turner-Cleary vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
200 1.00 1.00 1N N -2 ♠9 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Kitamura-Zaman
400 0.00 2.00 3N N -4 ♥2 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Adair
|
| 8 |
♠JT6
♥T2
♦9872
♣A732
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 5NT ♥6 ♠4 |
| EW: 1♥ 3♠ ♣2 ♦1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 1.00 5♠ W -2 ♥T 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Kitamura-Zaman
100 1.00 1.00 5♠ W -2 ♦9 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Adair
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ W -2 ♥T 6-Turner-Cleary vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
|
| 9 |
♠QJ5
♥AT6
♦Q73
♣AJ63
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6/5♣ 6♦ 6♥ 1♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 2.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♠K 6-Turner-Cleary vs 3-Kitamura-Zaman
480 1.00 1.00 4♥ S +2 ♠T 5-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
430 0.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♠A 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 10 |
♠AQJ87
♥T53
♦Q94
♣95
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠5 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 2♥ 1♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.00 0.00 6N* E -2 ♦J 5-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
630 1.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♦7 6-Turner-Cleary vs 3-Kitamura-Zaman
660 0.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♦5 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 11 |
♠Q6
♥QT3
♦JT62
♣QJ73
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥8 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
300 1.00 1.00 4♦* N -2 ♥K 6-Turner-Cleary vs 3-Kitamura-Zaman
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ W ♠Q 5-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 12 |
♠8752
♥AKJ8
♦AK4
♣97
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♣4 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
200 1.00 1.00 4♠ S -2 ♥T 5-Rankin-Adair vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
800 0.00 2.00 4♠* N -3 ♣K 6-Turner-Cleary vs 3-Kitamura-Zaman
|
| 13 |
♠T5
♥AT7653
♦J853
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: ♣4/3 ♦5 ♥6/5 ♠3/2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 1♠ S +3 ♦K 3-Kitamura-Zaman vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
140 1.00 1.00 1♠ S +2 ♦A 6-Turner-Cleary vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
110 0.00 2.00 1♠ S +1 ♦A 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 5-Rankin-Adair
|
| 14 |
♠AJ864
♥A8
♦KT6
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♣3 6-Turner-Cleary vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
400 1.00 1.00 3N N ♣5 3-Kitamura-Zaman vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
50 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♠2 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 5-Rankin-Adair
|
| 15 |
♠AQT
♥83
♦QJT97
♣AT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♥ -/1♠ 4NT ♦4 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♠9 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 5-Rankin-Adair
650 1.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♦Q 3-Kitamura-Zaman vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
100 0.00 2.00 4N N -1 ♦Q 6-Turner-Cleary vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 16 |
♠J
♥AQ9875
♦KJ4
♣AQT
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5/6♣ 5♥ 2♠ 4/3NT ♦4 |
| EW: 3♦ ♣1 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ S ♦3 3-Kitamura-Zaman vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
300 1.00 1.00 3♠ W -3 ♥Q 2-Woodford-Woodford vs 5-Rankin-Adair
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ S +2 ♦3 6-Turner-Cleary vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 17 |
♠642
♥Q976
♦T86
♣AJ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠4 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♥ N -1 ♠9 3-Kitamura-Zaman vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
100 0.50 1.50 3♠ S -2 ♦2 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
100 0.50 1.50 3♥ N -2 ♦J 6-Turner-Cleary vs 5-Rankin-Adair
|
| 18 |
♠32
♥QT8543
♦AT8
♣AQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ -/1♠ ♣6/7 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6/7 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 1.75 0.25 2N S -3 ♦3 3-Kitamura-Zaman vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
400 0.25 1.75 3♥ S -4 ♠9 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 19 |
♠K54
♥T42
♦AQJ83
♣T9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦7/6 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 2♦ E -4 ♣4 3-Kitamura-Zaman vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
200 1.00 1.00 1N* E -1 ♣K 6-Turner-Cleary vs 5-Rankin-Adair
110 0.00 2.00 3♣ S ♦5 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 20 |
♠KQ532
♥Q86
♦KT62
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/-♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠7/6 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 2♣ E ♠6 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
200 0.50 1.50 4♠ N -2 ♥J 3-Kitamura-Zaman vs 2-Woodford-Woodford
200 0.50 1.50 3♠ N -2 ♣J 6-Turner-Cleary vs 5-Rankin-Adair
|