| 1 |
♠A8
♥AQJT8
♦AK6
♣983
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 5/4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3/4 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N S +1 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Palmer-Woodford
150 1.00 1.00 2N S +1 ♠5 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Cleary-Rankin
50 0.00 2.00 2♦ N -1 ♣A 5-Shepard-Turner vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 2 |
♠AT7654
♥QJT8
♦K6
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3♥ E -2 ♣Q 5-Shepard-Turner vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
100 1.50 0.50 2♥ E -2 ♠9 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Cleary-Rankin
100 0.00 2.00 3♣ S -1 ♥5 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Palmer-Woodford
|
| 3 |
♠AT
♥AK98
♦9765
♣JT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦5/4 ♥5 ♠5 NT6/5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♦ E -1 ♠2 5-Shepard-Turner vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
90 1.00 1.00 1N N ♦A 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Palmer-Woodford
110 0.00 2.00 2♦ E +1 ♠J 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Cleary-Rankin
|
| 4 |
♠Q3
♥-
♦QJ83
♣KQJT763
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥3 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Palmer-Woodford
100 1.00 1.00 4♣ N -1 ♦2 5-Shepard-Turner vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ E ♣9 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Cleary-Rankin
|
| 5 |
♠AJ9
♥T75
♦QJ4
♣KT93
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4NT ♠5/6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.50 0.50 4♥ S ♠5 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Cleary-Rankin
620 1.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣A 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
50 0.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 ♥5 1-Palmer-Woodford vs 5-Shepard-Turner
|
| 6 |
♠74
♥-
♦AJT4
♣AKQJT97
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 5♣ N +1 ♣5 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
170 1.00 1.00 4♣ N +2 ♥8 1-Palmer-Woodford vs 5-Shepard-Turner
100 0.00 2.00 5♠ N -2 ♥A 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Cleary-Rankin
|
| 7 |
♠8
♥AQJ972
♦Q876
♣T6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣0 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
| EW: 6♣ 6♠ 6NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 0.00 5♠ E +1 ♥T 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
710 1.00 1.00 5♠ W +2 ♣T 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Cleary-Rankin
1460 0.00 2.00 6♠ W +1 ♥Q 1-Palmer-Woodford vs 5-Shepard-Turner
|
| 8 |
♠K2
♥8
♦AKQ5
♣976542
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ E -4 ♥A 1-Palmer-Woodford vs 5-Shepard-Turner
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 ♠9 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 ♠9 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Cleary-Rankin
|
| 9 |
♠K6
♥J5
♦KQJT4
♣9852
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 1.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♦8 2-Cleary-Rankin vs 1-Palmer-Woodford
430 1.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♦3 5-Shepard-Turner vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
200 0.00 2.00 3♠ S +2 ♦A 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 10 |
♠A976
♥75
♦82
♣AQJ75
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: -/1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥6/7 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♦ E -1 ♣3 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
90 0.50 1.50 2♦ E ♣3 2-Cleary-Rankin vs 1-Palmer-Woodford
90 0.50 1.50 2♦ E ♣3 5-Shepard-Turner vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 11 |
♠T642
♥AT732
♦83
♣J7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/4♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣3 ♦4 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.00 0.00 2N S +2 ♦6 2-Cleary-Rankin vs 1-Palmer-Woodford
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 ♣K 5-Shepard-Turner vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 12 |
♠J6532
♥6
♦KT
♣AT762
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1/-♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥7/6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 2♠ E -3 ♥3 2-Cleary-Rankin vs 1-Palmer-Woodford
150 1.50 0.50 4♦ W -3 ♥6 5-Shepard-Turner vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
100 0.00 2.00 2♥* E -1 ♠A 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 13 |
♠A985
♥532
♦J2
♣KJ96
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3/2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 3♠ E -2 ♥4 2-Cleary-Rankin vs 5-Shepard-Turner
200 1.50 0.50 2♠ E -2 ♦8 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♥6 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Palmer-Woodford
|
| 14 |
♠AKT6
♥K93
♦AQ97
♣J5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 3/2♦ 1/-♠ ♣7/6 ♥6 ♠7/6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -1 ♦2 2-Cleary-Rankin vs 5-Shepard-Turner
50 1.00 1.00 3♦ S -1 ♣K 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ E ♦3 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Palmer-Woodford
|
| 15 |
♠QT83
♥AKQ
♦65
♣AKQ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 5♦ 3/2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
750 2.00 0.00 5♦* S ♠2 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Palmer-Woodford
660 1.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♥7 2-Cleary-Rankin vs 5-Shepard-Turner
300 0.00 2.00 6N N -3 ♦T 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 16 |
♠A95
♥T854
♦QJ96
♣94
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠4 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ S ♥A 2-Cleary-Rankin vs 5-Shepard-Turner
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ S ♥A 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Palmer-Woodford
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ E +2 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 17 |
♠AK954
♥Q
♦Q8
♣J9854
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♥ 4♠ ♦5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣3 ♥5 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ N ♦A 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Shepard-Turner
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 ♦A 1-Palmer-Woodford vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 ♦A 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Cleary-Rankin
|
| 18 |
♠QJ42
♥K65
♦J652
♣J3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠9 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Shepard-Turner
100 0.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 ♦9 1-Palmer-Woodford vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
100 0.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 ♦9 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Cleary-Rankin
|
| 19 |
♠KJ4
♥AJT
♦K65
♣AKJ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♣ 2♦ 2/1♥ 7♠ 7NT |
| EW: ♣0 ♦5 ♥5 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 1.00 1.00 6♠ S +1 ♥5 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Cleary-Rankin
1010 1.00 1.00 6♠ S +1 ♣4 1-Palmer-Woodford vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
1010 1.00 1.00 6♠ S +1 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Shepard-Turner
|
| 20 |
♠T8753
♥QJ83
♦64
♣KT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 5♣ 3♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♣ E +1 ♦A 6-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Shepard-Turner
130 1.00 1.00 3♣ E +1 ♦A 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Cleary-Rankin
150 0.00 2.00 4♣ E +1 ♦A 1-Palmer-Woodford vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|