| 1 |
♠Q
♥932
♦AT765
♣T653
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5/6 ♦4/5 ♥5 ♠4/5 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 ♣T 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 2-Hurley-Collins
50 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 ♣T 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 3-Lagodimos-Collins
90 1.00 3.00 2♣ W ♥9 6-Rogers-Hale vs 6-Crail-Bloch
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♦A 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 2 |
♠AK9852
♥AKJ843
♦6
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2/3 ♠2 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♦7 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 2-Hurley-Collins
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♦7 6-Rogers-Hale vs 6-Crail-Bloch
600 2.00 2.00 5♣ S 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 3-Lagodimos-Collins
100 0.50 3.50 6♣ S -1 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
100 0.50 3.50 5♣ S -1 ♠Q 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 3 |
♠AQ87
♥A9
♦JT85
♣K98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2/3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♥2 6-Rogers-Hale vs 6-Crail-Bloch
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ N +1 ♥2 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 2-Hurley-Collins
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ N +1 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 3-Lagodimos-Collins
90 0.50 3.50 1N S ♣5 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
90 0.50 3.50 2♦ S ♥J 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 4 |
♠K32
♥QJ96
♦64
♣AQ82
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♣5 6-Rogers-Hale vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S ♣J 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Crail-Bloch
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ W -1 ♥Q 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 2-Hurley-Collins
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +1 ♦6 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♠4 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 5 |
♠QJT
♥K983
♦T76
♣754
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5/6♦ 5/6♥ 3/5NT ♣6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 ♠5 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
630 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♣J 6-Rogers-Hale vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♣J 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
150 1.00 3.00 4♦ S +1 ♠2 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Crail-Bloch
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ S +1 ♥5 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 2-Hurley-Collins
|
| 6 |
♠52
♥KQ865
♦AKQJ6
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/4♣ 6♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3/4NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥4/3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 4.00 0.00 6♦ N ♥J 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
460 2.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♥2 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Crail-Bloch
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♥J 6-Rogers-Hale vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
400 1.00 3.00 5♦ N ♥J 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 2-Hurley-Collins
150 0.00 4.00 2♦ N +3 ♥J 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 7 |
♠T73
♥JT
♦AK73
♣AQ74
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2/3 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣4 6-Rogers-Hale vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♥7 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 3-Lagodimos-Collins
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ W +2 ♠7 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 6-Crail-Bloch
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♦K 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♣4 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 8 |
♠AQ53
♥QT52
♦KQJT
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 1.00 3N N ♠7 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 3-Lagodimos-Collins
400 3.00 1.00 3N N ♠7 6-Rogers-Hale vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
400 3.00 1.00 3N N ♥3 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 6-Crail-Bloch
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♠4 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
50 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♠9 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 9 |
♠A8754
♥9
♦54
♣J8653
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥* W -1 ♦5 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 6-Crail-Bloch
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♦8 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 ♦2 6-Rogers-Hale vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W ♣5 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 3-Lagodimos-Collins
150 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -3 ♦7 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
|
| 10 |
♠AK9532
♥T7
♦KJT3
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♠ ♥3 NT5 |
| EW: 3♥ 2NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.25 0.75 4♠ N ♥2 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 6-Crail-Bloch
620 3.25 0.75 4♠ N ♥2 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 2-Hurley-Collins
100 0.75 3.25 4♥ W -1 ♣A 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
100 0.75 3.25 3♥ W -1 ♠K 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 11 |
♠9
♥K542
♦A9852
♣J73
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♦ S +2 ♠5 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 6-Crail-Bloch
130 2.50 1.50 4♦ S ♣A 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 2-Hurley-Collins
130 2.50 1.50 2♦ S +2 ♦3 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
50 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♥Q 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
100 0.00 4.00 5♦* S -1 ♣A 6-Rogers-Hale vs 3-Lagodimos-Collins
|
| 12 |
♠Q5
♥J3
♦AT9
♣KJT976
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 6/5♦ 5/4♥ 6/5NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦1 ♥2/1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.25 0.75 3N S ♠3 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
600 3.25 0.75 3N S ♠3 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 6-Crail-Bloch
100 1.38 2.63 3♠ E -2 ♥A 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 2-Hurley-Collins
100 0.13 3.88 3N S -1 ♠J 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
|
| 13 |
♠A
♥KJ42
♦AQJ83
♣A43
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1/2♥ ♣4/6 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.88 0.13 4♠* W -2 ♥2 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
100 2.63 1.38 4♠ W -1 ♦A 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Lagodimos-Collins
100 1.38 2.63 4♥ N -1 ♦2 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
140 0.13 3.88 3♠ W ♥K 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
|
| 14 |
♠KT3
♥96
♦K87642
♣J8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 2/3NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
610 3.88 0.13 4♦* N +1 ♣T 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Lagodimos-Collins
150 2.63 1.38 4♠ E -3 ♣A 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
130 1.38 2.63 3♦ N +1 ♠6 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
50 0.13 3.88 3♠ E -1 ♣A 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 15 |
♠942
♥J
♦AKJ98
♣AK42
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 4♥ E -3 ♦3 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 5-Revello-Sasson-Elphick
100 2.63 1.38 4♥ E -2 ♦T 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Lagodimos-Collins
50 1.38 2.63 3♥ E -1 ♦T 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
200 0.13 3.88 3♠ S -2 ♥7 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 16 |
♠AQ96
♥QJ
♦A843
♣863
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♣ E -2 ♦K 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 6-Rogers-Hale vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ E 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Hurley-Collins
130 1.00 3.00 2♣ E +2 ♦6 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 3-Lagodimos-Collins
150 0.00 4.00 2♦ N -3 ♣A 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 6-Crail-Bloch
|
| 17 |
♠KQJ974
♥7
♦92
♣KJ74
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
| EW: 5♦ 5♥ 3NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 4.00 0.00 Pass Out 6-Rogers-Hale vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
230 3.00 1.00 3♥ E +3 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Hurley-Collins
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♠T 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 3-Lagodimos-Collins
480 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +2 ♠T 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
480 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +2 ♠T 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 6-Crail-Bloch
|
| 18 |
♠AKQT6432
♥2
♦52
♣Q9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ 2NT ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 2-Sloan-Dodson vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 6-Rogers-Hale vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
200 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -2 ♠4 3-Parikh-Parikh vs 6-Crail-Bloch
200 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -2 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Hurley-Collins
500 0.00 4.00 5♠* N -2 ♦K 4-Kitamura-Cleary vs 3-Lagodimos-Collins
|