| 1 |
♠K
♥AT76543
♦75
♣A93
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠A 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 1-Collins-Hurley
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ N +2 ♠2 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Cleary-Potter
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ N ♦J 4-Collins-Dodson vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ N +1 ♦J 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♦J 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
|
| 2 |
♠532
♥AK953
♦983
♣K8
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♣7 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
660 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♣5 4-Collins-Dodson vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♦2 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 1-Collins-Hurley
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ N ♣9 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Cleary-Potter
100 0.00 4.00 5♥ N -1 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
|
| 3 |
♠J63
♥97
♦J92
♣K7542
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: -/1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6/7 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 2♦ S +2 ♣T 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 1-Collins-Hurley
100 3.00 1.00 1N E -1 ♥5 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
80 2.00 2.00 1♥ S ♣T 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Cleary-Potter
50 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -1 ♣T 4-Collins-Dodson vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
50 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -1 ♣T 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
|
| 4 |
♠T6542
♥87
♦J72
♣987
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠4 NT1 |
| EW: 6♣ 6/5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.50 0.50 4N W +1 ♣9 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Cleary-Potter
660 3.50 0.50 3N W +2 ♠4 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 1-Collins-Hurley
690 2.00 2.00 4N W +2 ♠4 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
720 1.00 3.00 4N W +3 ♠6 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
1440 0.00 4.00 6N W ♠4 4-Collins-Dodson vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
|
| 5 |
♠T65
♥J
♦J84
♣KQT932
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 2N S +1 4-Collins-Dodson vs 1-Collins-Hurley
150 3.50 0.50 3♣ S +2 ♦K 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 5-Cleary-Potter
130 1.50 2.50 3♣ S +1 ♦K 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
130 1.50 2.50 3♣ S +1 ♦K 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
50 0.00 4.00 3♥ W -1 ♦J 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
|
| 6 |
♠754
♥A862
♦62
♣AJ76
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦5 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ S ♥7 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 5-Cleary-Potter
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ S ♥7 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 ♥7 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ S ♥7 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
100 0.00 4.00 4♦ E -1 ♠A 4-Collins-Dodson vs 1-Collins-Hurley
|
| 7 |
♠953
♥92
♦Q53
♣AT854
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 1/-♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♣6 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
90 3.00 1.00 2♦ E ♠A 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
100 2.00 2.00 1♥ S -1 ♦4 4-Collins-Dodson vs 1-Collins-Hurley
200 1.00 3.00 2N N -2 ♦J 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
400 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -4 ♠8 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 5-Cleary-Potter
|
| 8 |
♠5
♥KJ
♦AQ532
♣KT982
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3/4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4/5 ♠2/1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♥7 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 5-Cleary-Potter
50 2.50 1.50 5♠ S -1 ♣A 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
50 2.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♥7 4-Collins-Dodson vs 1-Collins-Hurley
100 0.50 3.50 6♠ S -2 ♣A 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -2 ♣A 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
|
| 9 |
♠J3
♥QJ853
♦653
♣AQ7
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦2 NT5 |
| EW: 5♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 3♦ E ♥A 4-Collins-Dodson vs 5-Cleary-Potter
110 3.50 0.50 2♦ E +1 ♠5 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
150 1.50 2.50 3♦ E +2 ♥A 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
150 1.50 2.50 2♦ E +3 ♠5 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
600 0.00 4.00 5♦ E ♥A 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Collins-Hurley
|
| 10 |
♠AJ3
♥AQT6
♦AKT
♣JT6
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 4♦ 3/5♥ 1/2♠ 3/5NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠6 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Collins-Hurley
660 3.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠6 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
600 1.50 2.50 3N N ♠T 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
600 1.50 2.50 3N N ♠6 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
210 0.00 4.00 2N N +3 ♠6 4-Collins-Dodson vs 5-Cleary-Potter
|
| 11 |
♠82
♥J7
♦A8543
♣QJ75
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥2/3 ♠2 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♦T 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Collins-Hurley
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♦T 4-Collins-Dodson vs 5-Cleary-Potter
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦7 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ E ♦T 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♣6 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 12 |
♠643
♥KJ852
♦J92
♣KQ
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
| EW: 5♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♥A 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Collins-Hurley
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♥A 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♥A 4-Collins-Dodson vs 5-Cleary-Potter
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♥4 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♦3 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
|
| 13 |
♠AJ43
♥97
♦KQT84
♣T8
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ W ♣T 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Cleary-Potter
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ W ♦K 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ W ♦3 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 1-Collins-Hurley
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ W +1 ♣T 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ E +1 ♣8 4-Collins-Dodson vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
|
| 14 |
♠J92
♥AQ93
♦K865
♣T3
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 4♥ 2♠ 1NT
♣7/6 ♦6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♣T 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ E -1 ♣A 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 1-Collins-Hurley
100 1.50 2.50 1N S -2 ♣3 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Cleary-Potter
100 1.50 2.50 2♦ N -2 ♠5 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ W +2 ♣A 4-Collins-Dodson vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
|
| 15 |
♠T52
♥K73
♦T43
♣J983
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4/3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 2N E ♦6 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Cleary-Potter
120 3.50 0.50 1N W +1 ♣3 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♦T 4-Collins-Dodson vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
400 0.50 3.50 3N W ♣9 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 1-Collins-Hurley
400 0.50 3.50 3N E ♦6 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
|
| 16 |
♠J96
♥Q
♦8752
♣KQ986
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ S -1 ♦J 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
50 3.50 0.50 2♥ S -1 ♦A 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
100 1.50 2.50 3♥* S -1 ♦A 4-Collins-Dodson vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ S -2 ♦A 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 1-Collins-Hurley
150 0.00 4.00 1N W +2 ♣8 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Cleary-Potter
|
| 17 |
♠AQ62
♥AT64
♦Q9642
♣-
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1/2NT ♣5/6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ S ♣Q 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 5-Cleary-Potter
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♣Q 4-Collins-Dodson vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ S ♣Q 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
100 1.00 3.00 3♣ E -2 ♦T 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♥9 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Collins-Hurley
|
| 18 |
♠T643
♥64
♦94
♣KJT53
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ E ♣A 4-Collins-Dodson vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
150 3.00 1.00 2N W +1 ♥4 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
180 2.00 2.00 1N W +3 ♣J 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 5-Cleary-Potter
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ E ♦Q 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ E ♣A 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Collins-Hurley
|
| 19 |
♠A84
♥J76
♦5
♣Q96543
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ S -2 ♠K 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ S -3 ♠K 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ S -3 ♠K 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 5-Cleary-Potter
150 2.00 2.00 2♦ S -3 ♣K 4-Collins-Dodson vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
1100 0.00 4.00 4♦* S -5 ♠K 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Collins-Hurley
|
| 20 |
♠A6
♥654
♦9853
♣AK98
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4NT ♥5 ♠4 |
| EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 ♣5 5-Cogdill-Crail vs 5-Cleary-Potter
100 3.00 1.00 5♣ S -1 ♥J 4-Collins-Dodson vs 3-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E ♣Q 3-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Collins-Hurley
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ E ♥A 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Angione-Lagodimos
790 0.00 4.00 4♠* E ♥A 1-Sloan-Amantea vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
|