Hands and Results
| 1 |
♠75432
♥AK32
♦3
♣QT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2/1 ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3♦ E -2 ♥6 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 6-Schottle-Swift
50 3.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♠2 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
50 3.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♥5 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
110 2.00 3.00 3♦ E ♦3 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
130 1.00 4.00 2♦ E +2 ♥5 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 4-Rogers-Hale
150 0.00 5.00 3♣ E +2 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
|
| 2 |
♠AK9
♥Q987
♦AT6
♣K74
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 5.00 0.00 4♦* W -5 ♠A 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 6-Schottle-Swift
650 4.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♣2 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
630 3.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♦4 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
200 2.00 3.00 2♠ S +3 ♠Q 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
180 1.00 4.00 2N N +2 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
140 0.00 5.00 2♠ N +1 ♣T 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 4-Rogers-Hale
|
| 3 |
♠K8632
♥J
♦3
♣AJT932
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦2 ♥0 NT5 |
| EW: 5♦ 6♥ ♣3/4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 6♥** W -1 ♣A 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
200 4.00 1.00 5♦* E -1 ♠A 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
100 2.50 2.50 6♥ W -1 ♦3 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 4-Rogers-Hale
100 2.50 2.50 6♦ E -1 ♠A 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
680 1.00 4.00 5♥ W +1 ♦3 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 6-Schottle-Swift
710 0.00 5.00 5♥ W +2 ♦3 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
|
| 4 |
♠KT762
♥KQT8
♦-
♣KQ94
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1600 5.00 0.00 4♥** W -3 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
300 4.00 1.00 5♦ E -3 ♠Q 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
200 2.50 2.50 4♦ W -2 ♠T 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 4-Rogers-Hale
200 2.50 2.50 3♦ E -2 ♠5 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 6-Schottle-Swift
100 0.50 4.50 5♦ E -1 ♠Q 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
100 0.50 4.50 3♦ W -1 ♣K 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 5 |
♠KJ2
♥43
♦KQT43
♣652
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1/-♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥7/6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 1N E -2 ♣3 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
100 4.50 0.50 3♥ W -2 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 6-Schottle-Swift
50 3.00 2.00 1N W -1 ♦4 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 4-Rogers-Hale
90 2.00 3.00 1N E ♥T 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
100 1.00 4.00 2♦ N -1 ♠A 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
300 0.00 5.00 3N N -3 ♠A 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
|
| 6 |
♠QJ97
♥7
♦A982
♣Q652
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥5 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.30 0.70 3N S +1 ♥9 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
430 4.30 0.70 3N S +1 ♥9 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
150 2.50 2.50 2♦ S +3 ♣6 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
130 0.70 4.30 4♦ S ♥9 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
130 0.70 4.30 4♦ S ♥9 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 4-Rogers-Hale
|
| 7 |
♠QJ4
♥K76
♦7632
♣AT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
| EW: 6♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♦7 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
150 4.00 1.00 3♣ W +2 ♠Q 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 6-Schottle-Swift
170 3.00 2.00 3♣ W +3 ♦7 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
600 2.00 3.00 5♣ W ♦2 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
630 1.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♠Q 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
660 0.00 5.00 3N W +2 ♦7 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 4-Rogers-Hale
|
| 8 |
♠K543
♥Q864
♦Q873
♣J
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.30 0.70 2♠ W -2 ♣J 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 4-Rogers-Hale
100 4.30 0.70 2♠ E -2 ♦K 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
90 1.90 3.10 2♦ S ♠7 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 6-Schottle-Swift
90 1.90 3.10 2♣ S ♠2 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
50 0.10 4.90 3N E -1 ♣4 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
|
| 9 |
♠AT
♥JT65
♦A43
♣QJT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4NT ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠Q 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
460 4.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠Q 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 6-Schottle-Swift
150 3.00 2.00 3♣ N +2 ♠Q 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 4-Rogers-Hale
130 2.00 3.00 3♣ N +1 ♠Q 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
50 1.00 4.00 4♣ N -1 ♠Q 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
100 0.00 5.00 3N S -2 ♠8 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
|
| 10 |
♠AKJ63
♥AT42
♦KT
♣JT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ 1/-NT ♦5 ♥6 NT7/6 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 5.00 0.00 1♠ N ♥3 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
100 2.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♥3 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 4-Rogers-Hale
100 2.00 3.00 1N N -1 ♣2 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
100 2.00 3.00 3♠ N -1 ♥3 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 6-Schottle-Swift
100 2.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♥3 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
100 2.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 11 |
♠A9432
♥-
♦T954
♣Q954
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥4 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.00 0.00 2♦ S +2 ♠6 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 6-Schottle-Swift
100 3.50 1.50 4♥* E -1 ♠Q 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 4-Rogers-Hale
100 3.50 1.50 4♥* E -1 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
50 2.00 3.00 3♥ W -1 ♦T 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
50 0.50 4.50 3N S -1 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
50 0.50 4.50 4♦ S -1 ♥5 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
|
| 12 |
♠875
♥A3
♦T9873
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/2♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♦6 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
110 3.50 1.50 3♦ N ♥4 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 6-Schottle-Swift
110 3.50 1.50 3♦ N ♣A 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 4-Rogers-Hale
100 1.50 3.50 4♣ E -2 ♦A 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
100 1.50 3.50 3♣ E -2 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
50 0.00 5.00 2♥ W -1 ♠8 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
|
| 13 |
♠K8
♥JT92
♦J62
♣AK43
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 3♦ S +2 ♠5 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
130 4.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 ♠9 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 6-Schottle-Swift
120 3.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♠3 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
110 2.00 3.00 2♠ W ♥J 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
140 0.50 4.50 2♠ W +1 ♣A 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
140 0.50 4.50 2♥ E +1 ♣J 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 4-Rogers-Hale
|
| 14 |
♠QT54
♥6
♦53
♣AKJT43
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3/4 |
| EW: 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♣A 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
50 4.00 1.00 3♣ N -1 ♦6 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
100 2.50 2.50 4♣ N -2 ♥3 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 6-Schottle-Swift
100 2.50 2.50 3♣ N -2 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 4-Rogers-Hale
110 1.00 4.00 3♦ W ♥6 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
500 0.00 5.00 3♣* N -3 ♥3 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
|
| 15 |
♠4
♥743
♦T3
♣AQJ8654
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠1 NT2 |
| EW: 2♦ 6♠ 4NT ♣3 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 5.00 0.00 4♠ E +1 ♥K 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
480 3.00 2.00 5♠ E +1 ♦A 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
480 3.00 2.00 5♠ E +1 ♣T 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 6-Schottle-Swift
480 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♣T 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
980 1.00 4.00 6♠ E ♦A 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 4-Rogers-Hale
1400 0.00 5.00 5♥* S -5 ♠A 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
|
| 16 |
♠854
♥985
♦T65
♣KQJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥0 ♠2 NT1 |
| EW: 4♣ 6/5♦ 7/5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣T 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 6-Schottle-Swift
170 4.00 1.00 3♦ E +3 ♠6 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
600 3.00 2.00 3N W ♣K 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
630 2.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♦4 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
660 1.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♥2 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 4-Rogers-Hale
690 0.00 5.00 3N E +3 ♠6 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
|
| 17 |
♠A96
♥AKT3
♦76
♣A962
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♠ S ♦K 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 4-Rogers-Hale
100 4.00 1.00 4♥* E -1 ♦J 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
90 3.00 2.00 1N N ♠3 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
50 2.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♦A 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
100 0.50 4.50 3♠* S -1 ♥J 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 6-Schottle-Swift
100 0.50 4.50 2♠ S -2 ♦K 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
|
| 18 |
♠T
♥AQT8764
♦Q6
♣QT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♥3 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
50 2.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♥3 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
50 2.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♥3 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
50 2.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♥3 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 6-Schottle-Swift
50 2.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♥3 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
110 0.00 5.00 2♠ E ♠2 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 4-Rogers-Hale
|
| 19 |
♠AJ6
♥87432
♦76
♣KQ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
100 4.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♠A 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 6-Schottle-Swift
PASS 2.00 3.00 Pass Out 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
PASS 2.00 3.00 Pass Out 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
PASS 2.00 3.00 Pass Out 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
130 0.00 5.00 4♣ E ♥Q 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 4-Rogers-Hale
|
| 20 |
♠754
♥AKJT85
♦9852
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣1 ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 6♣ 2/1♦ 2/3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 5♣ W -1 ♥A 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
100 4.50 0.50 5♣ W -1 ♥A 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
130 3.00 2.00 4♣ E ♥Q 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 4-Rogers-Hale
170 2.00 3.00 2♠ E +2 ♥Q 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
620 1.00 4.00 5♣ E +1 ♥A 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
800 0.00 5.00 3♥* N -3 ♠A 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 6-Schottle-Swift
|
| 21 |
♠632
♥T952
♦A7
♣J932
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♥ S +2 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 6-Schottle-Swift
100 4.00 1.00 3♦* E -1 ♥K 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
90 3.00 2.00 1♣ S +1 ♥8 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
100 1.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♦Q 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
100 1.50 3.50 3♥ N -1 ♦Q 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
130 0.00 5.00 3♦ E +1 ♠7 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 4-Rogers-Hale
|
| 22 |
♠KJT942
♥T
♦632
♣QJ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 3♣ S ♦A 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
50 3.50 1.50 5♣ S -1 ♦K 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
50 3.50 1.50 3♣ S -1 ♦A 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 6-Schottle-Swift
100 1.00 4.00 3N S -2 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♦K 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 4-Rogers-Hale
100 1.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 ♦A 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
|
| 23 |
♠J984
♥Q98543
♦2
♣93
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/3♥ ♣6 ♦2 ♠6 NT3/5 |
| EW: 1♣ 5♦ 1♠ 2/1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
730 5.00 0.00 3♥* S ♦K 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
200 4.00 1.00 5♦* E -1 ♥J 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
140 3.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♥5 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
200 2.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 ♠3 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 6-Schottle-Swift
750 1.00 4.00 5♦* E ♠A 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
1100 0.00 5.00 4♣* S -4 ♥K 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 4-Rogers-Hale
|
| 24 |
♠AQ42
♥T52
♦987
♣Q43
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
| EW: 3♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♣Q 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 1-Bloomberg-Wetz
50 4.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 1-Angione-Dusharme vs 2-Lagodimos-Mottola
110 2.50 2.50 2♥ W ♦9 3-Sloan-Bishop vs 6-Schottle-Swift
110 2.50 2.50 3♦ E ♥8 4-Rubin-Molnar vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
450 1.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♠2 2-Stebbins-Richards vs 4-Rogers-Hale
480 0.00 5.00 4♥ W +2 ♦9 5-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
|