Hands and Results
| 1 |
♠AJ97
♥AKT
♦AJT2
♣84
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1/-♥ 2♠ ♦6 ♥7/6 NT6 |
| EW: -/1♦ ♣5 ♦6/7 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 1N N +1 ♥4 5-Ciolli-Block vs 4-Schottle-Swift
120 3.50 0.50 1N N +1 ♥2 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 ♠T 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
50 1.00 3.00 2N S -1 ♣A 1-Rogers-Hale vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
150 0.00 4.00 2♦ N -3 ♥2 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 2 |
♠AJ982
♥965
♦AK8
♣Q5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♦6 5-Ciolli-Block vs 4-Schottle-Swift
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♥2 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦4 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ N 1-Rogers-Hale vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
600 0.00 4.00 3N N ♥2 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
|
| 3 |
♠QJT63
♥K
♦986
♣AQ87
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT6 |
| EW: 4/3♦ 4♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ N +1 ♥A 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ N ♥A 1-Rogers-Hale vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ W ♠Q 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ W ♠Q 5-Ciolli-Block vs 4-Schottle-Swift
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ W ♦6 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 4 |
♠T4
♥A8642
♦A42
♣975
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦3/4 ♠2 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♥ S -1 ♠K 1-Rogers-Hale vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ W ♥A 5-Ciolli-Block vs 4-Schottle-Swift
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ W ♣9 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ W ♣5 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♥A 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 5 |
♠J975
♥Q73
♦KJT
♣QT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4/3 ♠6/5 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ E ♠4 1-Rogers-Hale vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ E ♠4 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ E +1 ♠8 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ E +1 ♦Q 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 4-Schottle-Swift
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♠6 5-Ciolli-Block vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
|
| 6 |
♠9863
♥765
♦Q63
♣A83
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ N ♦4 1-Rogers-Hale vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
100 2.00 2.00 1N W -1 ♣3 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ W -1 ♠9 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
100 2.00 2.00 2♦ W -1 ♠3 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 4-Schottle-Swift
100 0.00 4.00 2♠* N -1 ♥T 5-Ciolli-Block vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
|
| 7 |
♠A3
♥KT8
♦JT965
♣A75
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♦ 1♥ 2♠ 4NT ♣5 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦1 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠K 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
660 3.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♥6 5-Ciolli-Block vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
630 1.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♥8 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
630 1.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♣Q 1-Rogers-Hale vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
620 0.00 4.00 5♦ S +1 ♣8 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 4-Schottle-Swift
|
| 8 |
♠AKQ94
♥K7
♦6543
♣J7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♠A 1-Rogers-Hale vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
50 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♠A 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
50 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♠A 5-Ciolli-Block vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
120 0.50 3.50 2N W ♠A 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 4-Schottle-Swift
120 0.50 3.50 1N W +1 ♠K 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
|
| 9 |
♠J7
♥K9542
♦AT96
♣93
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 ♠Q 1-Rogers-Hale vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
140 3.00 1.00 1♥ N +2 ♦6 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
120 2.00 2.00 1N S +1 ♦3 5-Ciolli-Block vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
90 1.00 3.00 1N S ♦5 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
50 0.00 4.00 2N N -1 ♣2 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
|
| 10 |
♠7643
♥KJ7
♦JT6
♣A92
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♠A 1-Rogers-Hale vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ S 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ S ♠A 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 5-Ciolli-Block vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -1 ♠A 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
|
| 11 |
♠AJT
♥KQ7
♦AQ43
♣T53
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4/3♦ 4/3♥ 1♠ 4/2NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♣6 1-Rogers-Hale vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
430 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♠6 5-Ciolli-Block vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
400 2.00 2.00 3N N ♠4 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
150 1.00 3.00 4♠ W -3 ♣3 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
50 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♠4 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
|
| 12 |
♠KQ2
♥J2
♦KJ2
♣K8432
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥6/5 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♠5 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
660 3.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♠5 5-Ciolli-Block vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
660 3.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♠3 1-Rogers-Hale vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
630 1.00 3.00 3N N +1 ♠5 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
500 0.00 4.00 6N* N -2 ♥Q 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
|
| 13 |
♠AJ976
♥Q9
♦A
♣KJT87
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♥3 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦9 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦9 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦5 1-Rogers-Hale vs 4-Schottle-Swift
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N +2 ♦9 5-Ciolli-Block vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
|
| 14 |
♠QJT53
♥A86432
♦4
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 4♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1/-NT ♥4 ♠3 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ N ♦K 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
50 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♦K 5-Ciolli-Block vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♦A 1-Rogers-Hale vs 4-Schottle-Swift
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♦K 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
50 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♦K 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 15 |
♠AJ85
♥Q42
♦T64
♣J84
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
| EW: 6♣ 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♦7 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
200 3.00 1.00 2♥ W +3 ♠5 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
400 2.00 2.00 3N W ♠5 1-Rogers-Hale vs 4-Schottle-Swift
460 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♣5 5-Ciolli-Block vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
490 0.00 4.00 3N W +3 ♦4 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 16 |
♠82
♥KJ743
♦KQT62
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦5 ♠2/1 NT1 |
| EW: 6♣ 1♦ 5♠ 5NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♣ W -1 ♥4 1-Rogers-Hale vs 4-Schottle-Swift
150 3.00 1.00 5♥ N -3 ♣6 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
500 2.00 2.00 5♥* N -3 ♦A 5-Ciolli-Block vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
640 1.00 3.00 5♣ W +2 ♠8 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
1370 0.00 4.00 6♣ W ♥3 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
|
| 17 |
♠AKT4
♥QJT743
♦74
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦5 |
| EW: 2/1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠2/1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 ♦5 5-Ciolli-Block vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♣T 1-Rogers-Hale vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦5 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ S ♦5 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ S 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Schottle-Swift
|
| 18 |
♠AT542
♥KJ8
♦K9
♣QT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♣A 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Schottle-Swift
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♣K 5-Ciolli-Block vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ N ♣A 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ N ♣A 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ N ♣K 1-Rogers-Hale vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
|
| 19 |
♠832
♥A65
♦AKT853
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♦ 7♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠3 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦0 ♥0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♣9 1-Rogers-Hale vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
50 2.00 2.00 5♥ S -1 ♠A 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
50 2.00 2.00 5♥ S -1 ♠A 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Schottle-Swift
50 2.00 2.00 5♥ S -1 ♠A 5-Ciolli-Block vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ W ♦A 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
|
| 20 |
♠2
♥732
♦KQJ5
♣AKT86
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♦K 1-Rogers-Hale vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♣A 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 1-Bloomberg-Lagodimos
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♠2 5-Ciolli-Block vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
100 1.00 3.00 5♣ N -1 ♥J 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
500 0.00 4.00 4♣* N -2 ♥J 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Schottle-Swift
|
| 21 |
♠AKQ96
♥J
♦KQ962
♣T6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ ♣6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦1 ♥1 ♠1/3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 5♣* W -4 ♥Q 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 4-Schottle-Swift
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♦A 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
630 2.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♦4 5-Ciolli-Block vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ S +1 ♣K 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♣A 1-Rogers-Hale vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 23 |
♠AT42
♥JT75
♦QJ72
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 |
| EW: 3♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠K 5-Ciolli-Block vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 ♠8 1-Rogers-Hale vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 ♠8 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
200 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -2 ♠K 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
200 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -2 ♣A 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 4-Schottle-Swift
|
| 24 |
♠QJ64
♥QT2
♦J9853
♣6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥8 5-Ciolli-Block vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ W ♥2 1-Rogers-Hale vs 2-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ E +1 ♦A 2-Stebbins-Cerezo vs 4-Schottle-Swift
150 1.00 3.00 3♣ W +2 ♦3 3-Bloch-Cogdill vs 6-Mackey-Dodson
400 0.00 4.00 3N W ♠Q 4-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Syversen-Vogt
|