Hands and Results
| 1 |
♠K8
♥KT85
♦T5
♣KJ764
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 2NT ♣5 ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♦2 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Lagodimos-Coates
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♠J 2-Wilson-Lewis vs 4-Curd-Von Sydow
90 1.00 2.00 2♦ E ♣A 8-Cogdill-Main vs 1-Locke-Neel
110 0.00 3.00 2♦ E +1 ♠6 3-Huffman-Crail vs 7-Bucknell-Eklund
|
| 2 |
♠8643
♥Q9
♦KQJ52
♣84
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥5 8-Cogdill-Main vs 1-Locke-Neel
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♣7 2-Wilson-Lewis vs 4-Curd-Von Sydow
170 1.50 1.50 2♥ S +2 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Lagodimos-Coates
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ N ♣5 3-Huffman-Crail vs 7-Bucknell-Eklund
|
| 3 |
♠AQT3
♥AJ9
♦Q43
♣J65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ S ♦J 6-Lagodimos-Coates vs 7-Bucknell-Eklund
100 1.50 1.50 1N N -2 ♦7 4-Curd-Von Sydow vs 1-Locke-Neel
100 1.50 1.50 2♥ S -2 ♦J 8-Cogdill-Main vs 2-Wilson-Lewis
110 0.00 3.00 2♦ E +1 ♥K 3-Huffman-Crail vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 4 |
♠2
♥K972
♦J86543
♣KJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT ♣6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♣T 8-Cogdill-Main vs 2-Wilson-Lewis
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 ♣8 6-Lagodimos-Coates vs 7-Bucknell-Eklund
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ S ♣7 3-Huffman-Crail vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
100 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♣7 4-Curd-Von Sydow vs 1-Locke-Neel
|
| 5 |
♠QJT8
♥4
♦6
♣J986542
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1/-♥ 3♠ 3/2NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♣ W -4 ♠Q 7-Bucknell-Eklund vs 1-Locke-Neel
100 1.50 1.50 3N W -2 ♥4 4-Curd-Von Sydow vs 6-Lagodimos-Coates
100 1.50 1.50 3N W -2 ♥4 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Wilson-Lewis
150 0.00 3.00 2N W +1 ♣6 8-Cogdill-Main vs 3-Huffman-Crail
|
| 6 |
♠QT87
♥KT53
♦95
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ S ♦Q 4-Curd-Von Sydow vs 6-Lagodimos-Coates
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣2 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Wilson-Lewis
170 1.00 2.00 2♠ S +2 ♠J 7-Bucknell-Eklund vs 1-Locke-Neel
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ S ♦Q 8-Cogdill-Main vs 3-Huffman-Crail
|
| 7 |
♠J954
♥8
♦K852
♣A865
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 6-Lagodimos-Coates vs 3-Huffman-Crail
200 2.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♣6 8-Cogdill-Main vs 4-Curd-Von Sydow
100 0.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 ♦J 1-Locke-Neel vs 2-Wilson-Lewis
100 0.50 2.50 3♥ E -1 ♣9 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Bucknell-Eklund
|
| 8 |
♠T42
♥K3
♦KT6
♣K7653
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 2/3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 6♥ E -2 ♦A 8-Cogdill-Main vs 4-Curd-Von Sydow
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ E ♥Q 1-Locke-Neel vs 2-Wilson-Lewis
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣5 5-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Bucknell-Eklund
490 0.00 3.00 3N W +3 6-Lagodimos-Coates vs 3-Huffman-Crail
|
| 9 |
♠T9
♥AKQJ7
♦93
♣AJ65
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3♠ W -4 ♥A 6-Lagodimos-Coates vs 1-Locke-Neel
200 1.50 1.50 2N W -2 ♥A 2-Wilson-Lewis vs 3-Huffman-Crail
200 1.50 1.50 2N E -2 ♥5 7-Bucknell-Eklund vs 4-Curd-Von Sydow
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ N ♦A 8-Cogdill-Main vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 10 |
♠T82
♥K52
♦AK8
♣A763
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 1♦ 6NT ♥5 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣1 ♦6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 5♣ S ♦J 2-Wilson-Lewis vs 3-Huffman-Crail
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ S +1 ♥9 7-Bucknell-Eklund vs 4-Curd-Von Sydow
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♣Q 6-Lagodimos-Coates vs 1-Locke-Neel
80 0.00 3.00 1♥ E ♣Q 8-Cogdill-Main vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 11 |
♠AQ8
♥QT542
♦765
♣A3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N N ♣5 7-Bucknell-Eklund vs 2-Wilson-Lewis
50 1.50 1.50 1N N -1 ♦2 3-Huffman-Crail vs 4-Curd-Von Sydow
50 1.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♣9 1-Locke-Neel vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
100 0.00 3.00 2♠ S -2 ♦4 8-Cogdill-Main vs 6-Lagodimos-Coates
|
| 12 |
♠KJ
♥AT842
♦JT9
♣Q65
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 6♦ 4♥ 6♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♥3 7-Bucknell-Eklund vs 2-Wilson-Lewis
210 2.00 1.00 2N N +3 ♥3 3-Huffman-Crail vs 4-Curd-Von Sydow
140 0.50 2.50 2♥ N +1 ♠4 1-Locke-Neel vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
140 0.50 2.50 2♥ N +1 ♣9 8-Cogdill-Main vs 6-Lagodimos-Coates
|
| 13 |
♠42
♥A9652
♦42
♣AT97
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 1.00 2♦ S +2 ♠Q 8-Cogdill-Main vs 7-Bucknell-Eklund
130 2.00 1.00 2♦ S +2 ♠2 2-Wilson-Lewis vs 6-Lagodimos-Coates
130 2.00 1.00 1♦ S +3 4-Curd-Von Sydow vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
100 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠T 1-Locke-Neel vs 3-Huffman-Crail
|
| 14 |
♠KT9852
♥AKJ9
♦5
♣J3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 1♠ N +1 ♥2 4-Curd-Von Sydow vs 5-Palmer-Palmer
100 2.00 1.00 2♠ N -2 ♦9 1-Locke-Neel vs 3-Huffman-Crail
110 1.00 2.00 3♦ E ♠A 2-Wilson-Lewis vs 6-Lagodimos-Coates
150 0.00 3.00 1N E +2 ♠Q 8-Cogdill-Main vs 7-Bucknell-Eklund
|