Hands and Results
| 1 |
♠KQ9
♥KJT83
♦QJ3
♣93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ N ♦4 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
50 1.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 ♦4 5-Pratt-Atkins vs 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♦4 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Lane-Angione
|
| 2 |
♠954
♥QJ82
♦J7
♣AKT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 2.00 0.00 Pass Out 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Lane-Angione
150 1.00 1.00 1N E +2 5-Pratt-Atkins vs 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind
200 0.00 2.00 1N S -2 ♦2 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 3 |
♠T
♥543
♦73
♣AKJT942
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦1 ♥1/2 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ W +1 ♣A 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
150 1.00 1.00 3♦ E +2 ♣8 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Lane-Angione
500 0.00 2.00 4♣* N -3 ♥8 5-Pratt-Atkins vs 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind
|
| 4 |
♠QJT3
♥AJ3
♦J973
♣K3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
| EW: 3♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4/3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♦Q 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 ♣5 5-Pratt-Atkins vs 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ E +2 ♠A 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Lane-Angione
|
| 5 |
♠Q9
♥982
♦AKT432
♣64
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥1 ♠1 NT2/3 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♥ E +2 ♦8 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 2-Lane-Angione
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ W ♦A 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Pratt-Atkins
430 0.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♣3 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind
|
| 6 |
♠T63
♥T84
♦8
♣QT9865
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3/2♥ 4/3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♣8 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 2-Lane-Angione
100 0.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♥3 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind
100 0.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♦7 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Pratt-Atkins
|
| 7 |
♠QT4
♥AKQ42
♦7
♣J943
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♥ N -1 ♦4 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 2-Lane-Angione
200 0.50 1.50 3N N -2 ♠9 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Pratt-Atkins
200 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -2 ♠3 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind
|
| 8 |
♠T2
♥AQ8543
♦QT3
♣85
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 ♥7 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 2-Lane-Angione
50 1.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♠A 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Pratt-Atkins
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ E ♥7 4-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind
|
| 9 |
♠853
♥743
♦QJ64
♣JT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 2/1♦ 3/2♥ 1/-♠ ♣5/4 ♠7/6 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♦ E -2 ♥A 5-Pratt-Atkins vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ E ♠T 2-Lane-Angione vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ E ♣A 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind
|
| 10 |
♠763
♥974
♦K95
♣AJ84
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ S ♦T 2-Lane-Angione vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♦T 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♦T 5-Pratt-Atkins vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
|
| 11 |
♠9654
♥87
♦T754
♣Q92
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦0 ♥4 ♠0 NT0 |
| EW: 6♣ 7♦ 3♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 0.00 4♠ W +2 ♥7 5-Pratt-Atkins vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
490 1.00 1.00 3N E +3 2-Lane-Angione vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
980 0.00 2.00 6♠ W ♦4 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind
|
| 12 |
♠Q642
♥J64
♦J
♣AT965
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 2/3♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 1N E -1 ♣K 2-Lane-Angione vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠T 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ E ♦A 5-Pratt-Atkins vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
|
| 13 |
♠QT9
♥K84
♦KJ962
♣KQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5/4♦ 5/4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 2-Lane-Angione vs 5-Pratt-Atkins
100 0.00 2.00 5♠ S -1 ♣J 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
|
| 14 |
♠9732
♥KQ62
♦A2
♣Q96
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2N E -2 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
90 1.00 1.00 1N E ♣2 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
120 0.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♦Q 2-Lane-Angione vs 5-Pratt-Atkins
|
| 15 |
♠AQ6
♥KJ
♦QJ97
♣A864
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 0.00 3N N +2 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
120 1.00 1.00 2N N ♦3 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥7 2-Lane-Angione vs 5-Pratt-Atkins
|
| 16 |
♠9742
♥AQT742
♦J7
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣5/3 ♦4/3 ♥5 ♠5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♣3 2-Lane-Angione vs 5-Pratt-Atkins
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ N ♠A 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 17 |
♠Q52
♥Q
♦AKJ984
♣432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 2/3♣ 5♥ 5♠ 1/4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
250 2.00 0.00 6♥ E -5 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind vs 2-Lane-Angione
200 1.00 1.00 5♦ S -4 ♣A 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 5-Pratt-Atkins
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ W ♦A 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
|
| 18 |
♠AK653
♥KT3
♦A94
♣K4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 7♦ 4♥ 7♠ 7NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦0 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
2490 2.00 0.00 7N* S ♥9 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind vs 2-Lane-Angione
1470 1.00 1.00 6N S +1 ♥7 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
1430 0.00 2.00 6♠ S ♥9 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 5-Pratt-Atkins
|
| 19 |
♠AJ832
♥T54
♦742
♣K9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2N W +1 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind vs 2-Lane-Angione
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ W ♣9 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
650 0.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♥4 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 5-Pratt-Atkins
|
| 20 |
♠9
♥T9
♦AT62
♣Q97642
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT5 |
| EW: 1/-♣ 1♥ 1NT ♣7/6 ♦2 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -4 ♠A 6-Gestiehr-Stebbins vs 5-Pratt-Atkins
300 1.00 1.00 4♥ E -3 ♠A 3-Lagodimos-Schneidewind vs 2-Lane-Angione
100 0.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♠A 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Dusharme-Dusharme
|