Hands and Results
| 1 |
♠843
♥KQT4
♦Q987
♣T4
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 1.50 0.50 3N E +1 ♠6 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 3-Osgood-Schneidewind
430 1.50 0.50 3N E +1 4-Angione-Gestiehr vs 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly
460 0.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♠6 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura
|
| 2 |
♠93
♥AJT64
♦AQ52
♣96
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥7 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 3-Osgood-Schneidewind
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♥7 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura
500 0.00 2.00 4♥* N -2 4-Angione-Gestiehr vs 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly
|
| 3 |
♠875432
♥643
♦AK
♣A3
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦T 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 3-Osgood-Schneidewind
180 1.00 1.00 2N N +2 ♦5 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ N ♣J 4-Angione-Gestiehr vs 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly
|
| 4 |
♠AQJT4
♥K32
♦A4
♣T75
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3/4NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦2/3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 1N W -2 ♠T 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 3-Osgood-Schneidewind
200 1.50 0.50 1N W -2 ♠A 4-Angione-Gestiehr vs 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♥5 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura
|
| 5 |
♠AJT7
♥5
♦42
♣K87654
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ N +1 ♦T 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
100 1.00 1.00 2♦* W -1 4-Angione-Gestiehr vs 3-Osgood-Schneidewind
50 0.00 2.00 1N W -1 ♣8 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly
|
| 6 |
♠943
♥K64
♦2
♣AKJ652
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥0 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♠K 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♠K 4-Angione-Gestiehr vs 3-Osgood-Schneidewind
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ S -2 ♠2 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly
|
| 7 |
♠AQ5
♥KJ3
♦T6
♣KJ765
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6/5 ♠6/5 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 0.50 3♣ N ♦6 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly
110 1.50 0.50 2♣ N +1 ♠4 4-Angione-Gestiehr vs 3-Osgood-Schneidewind
180 0.00 2.00 1N* W 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
|
| 8 |
♠JT3
♥AT854
♦AT95
♣3
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♦
♣2/3 ♥4 ♠3/4 NT5/6 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♥ 3♠ ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ S +1 ♠K 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
100 1.00 1.00 5♦* S -1 ♠A 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly
630 0.00 2.00 3♠* W +1 4-Angione-Gestiehr vs 3-Osgood-Schneidewind
|
| 9 |
♠AQ86
♥42
♦64
♣KJ973
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥2 NT3 |
| EW: 3♦ 5♥ 4NT ♣5/6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 6♥ W -1 ♦6 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 4-Angione-Gestiehr
650 1.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♥2 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly vs 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura
680 0.00 2.00 5♥ W +1 ♠A 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 3-Osgood-Schneidewind
|
| 10 |
♠KQT753
♥96
♦K2
♣J84
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 2.00 0.00 5♥* W -3 ♦K 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 4-Angione-Gestiehr
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ N ♥T 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 3-Osgood-Schneidewind
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♥4 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly vs 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura
|
| 11 |
♠3
♥8632
♦KT52
♣JT97
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS:
♣5/6 ♦5/6 ♥4/5 ♠3 NT3/4 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥K 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 4-Angione-Gestiehr
430 1.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♣7 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 3-Osgood-Schneidewind
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♣J 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly vs 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura
|
| 12 |
♠AKQ7
♥642
♦QJT92
♣2
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4/3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♣5 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly vs 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura
630 1.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♥T 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 4-Angione-Gestiehr
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥8 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 3-Osgood-Schneidewind
|
| 13 |
♠AKJ932
♥95
♦J
♣KT32
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 6♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 2♠* N -1 ♥J 3-Osgood-Schneidewind vs 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura
200 1.50 0.50 2♠ N -2 ♥J 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 4-Angione-Gestiehr
630 0.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♠8 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
|
| 14 |
♠J98
♥63
♦J64
♣KQJ96
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♣ 6♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠4 |
| EW: 2/1♥ 3♠ ♣0 ♦1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 2.00 0.00 4♦* S +2 ♠3 3-Osgood-Schneidewind vs 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura
140 0.50 1.50 3♠ E ♦A 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ E +1 ♦A 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 4-Angione-Gestiehr
|
| 15 |
♠32
♥J8
♦KQT73
♣K975
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6/5 ♥3 ♠2 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣6 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ W ♦K 3-Osgood-Schneidewind vs 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ W ♦K 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 4-Angione-Gestiehr
|
| 16 |
♠85
♥AQJ875
♦72
♣AT4
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠6 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♥3 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
100 1.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♥2 3-Osgood-Schneidewind vs 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura
660 0.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♠2 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 4-Angione-Gestiehr
|
| 17 |
♠JT743
♥8
♦KT953
♣65
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ ♣1 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 6♣ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ S ♠8 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
130 1.00 1.00 4♣ W 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 4-Angione-Gestiehr
430 0.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♥6 3-Osgood-Schneidewind vs 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly
|
| 18 |
♠AKT83
♥Q6
♦AK875
♣6
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♦ N +4 ♥8 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
150 1.00 1.00 3♦ N +2 ♥8 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 4-Angione-Gestiehr
130 0.00 2.00 2♦ N +2 ♥8 3-Osgood-Schneidewind vs 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly
|
| 19 |
♠Q842
♥AT943
♦A65
♣2
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♣ 2/1♦ 4/3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.00 0.00 1N* E -2 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 4-Angione-Gestiehr
90 1.00 1.00 1N S ♣4 3-Osgood-Schneidewind vs 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly
50 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♦4 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
|
| 20 |
♠J
♥K5432
♦AT4
♣KQ97
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 3♣ 6♦ 5♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ W ♣K 3-Osgood-Schneidewind vs 2-Goldsmith-Heatherly
800 0.50 1.50 3♥* N -3 ♠A 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
800 0.50 1.50 3♥* N -3 1-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 4-Angione-Gestiehr
|