Hands and Results
| 1 |
♠QT8
♥62
♦AQ9
♣KQJ86
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2NT ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 |
| EW: 2/3♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 3♣ N ♦4 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
50 5.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♣3 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
50 3.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♦4 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Rogers-Hale
50 3.50 2.50 2N N -1 ♦4 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 6-Angione-Lane
90 2.00 4.00 2♦ W ♣K 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
110 0.50 5.50 3♦ W ♥6 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
110 0.50 5.50 3♦ W ♣K 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
|
| 2 |
♠AQ
♥AQ842
♦AK862
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1700 6.00 0.00 4♥* E -7 ♦J 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 6-Angione-Lane
1400 5.00 1.00 4♥* E -6 ♦J 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
1100 4.00 2.00 4♥* E -5 ♠J 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
800 3.00 3.00 3♥* E -4 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
500 2.00 4.00 4♠* W -3 ♥A 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
100 1.00 5.00 3♠ W -2 ♣9 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Rogers-Hale
400 0.00 6.00 3♦ N -4 ♣A 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 3 |
♠542
♥QT932
♦J92
♣85
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
| EW: 6♣ 2♦ 3♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♦6 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
660 4.50 1.50 3N E +2 ♦6 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Rogers-Hale
660 4.50 1.50 3N E +2 ♦5 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
660 4.50 1.50 3N E +2 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
690 1.50 4.50 3N W +3 ♥T 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
690 1.50 4.50 3N W +3 ♥T 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 6-Angione-Lane
1370 0.00 6.00 6♣ E ♥A 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
|
| 4 |
♠A32
♥Q974
♦T43
♣J95
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 6.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♣4 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
630 4.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♣6 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
630 4.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♣6 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
630 4.00 2.00 3N N +1 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
150 2.00 4.00 1N S +2 ♣4 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Rogers-Hale
120 1.00 5.00 1N S +1 ♣4 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
110 0.00 6.00 2♦ S +1 ♠T 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 6-Angione-Lane
|
| 5 |
♠T2
♥K742
♦J97
♣8752
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ 6♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 6♠ E -1 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
450 3.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♥8 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 7-Rogers-Hale
450 3.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♦K 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
450 3.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♦K 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
450 3.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♦K 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
450 3.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♦3 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Angione-Lane
480 0.00 6.00 4♠ E +2 ♦K 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
|
| 6 |
♠Q
♥AK98743
♦7
♣AJT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 5.50 0.50 4♥ N +2 ♠K 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
480 5.50 0.50 4♥ N +2 ♠7 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 7-Rogers-Hale
450 2.00 4.00 4♥ N +1 ♠T 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
450 2.00 4.00 4♥ N +1 ♠K 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
450 2.00 4.00 4♥ N +1 ♠7 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Angione-Lane
450 2.00 4.00 4♥ N +1 ♥J 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
450 2.00 4.00 4♥ N +1 ♥J 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
|
| 7 |
♠Q765
♥AQJ98
♦652
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♦ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♣A 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
650 4.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♣A 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
650 4.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♣A 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
650 4.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
200 1.50 4.50 2♠ S +3 ♣K 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 7-Rogers-Hale
200 1.50 4.50 3♥ N +2 ♠T 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
100 0.00 6.00 4♥ N -1 ♣2 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Angione-Lane
|
| 8 |
♠K7
♥8432
♦9543
♣A63
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2/1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 5♠* E -1 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
140 4.50 1.50 3♠ E ♣4 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
140 4.50 1.50 2♠ E +1 ♥3 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 7-Rogers-Hale
200 2.00 4.00 2♠ E +3 ♠6 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
200 2.00 4.00 2♠ E +3 ♠5 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
200 2.00 4.00 2♠ E +3 ♣4 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Angione-Lane
450 0.00 6.00 4♠ E +1 ♥A 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
|
| 9 |
♠A942
♥3
♦J754
♣AKQT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-NT ♦6 ♥5/4 ♠6 NT7/6 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 3♣ N ♦K 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 7-Rogers-Hale
90 4.50 1.50 2♣ N ♥2 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
90 4.50 1.50 2♣ N 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
50 3.00 3.00 1♠ N -1 ♣3 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
100 1.50 4.50 2N S -2 ♠5 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
100 1.50 4.50 1N N -2 ♠5 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
120 0.00 6.00 1N W +1 ♦4 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 6-Angione-Lane
|
| 10 |
♠J76
♥AK76
♦A93
♣J53
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6/5♣ 4/3♥ 5NT ♦5 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣1 ♥2/1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 5.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♦K 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 6-Angione-Lane
660 5.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♦K 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
660 5.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♦K 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
600 3.00 3.00 5♣ S ♣2 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
150 1.00 5.00 4♣ S +1 ♦T 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 7-Rogers-Hale
150 1.00 5.00 4♣ S +1 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
150 1.00 5.00 4♣ N +1 ♦T 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
|
| 11 |
♠AK987
♥Q42
♦T53
♣J4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.00 0.00 3♥ S +1 ♣7 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 7-Rogers-Hale
50 5.00 1.00 4♣ W -1 ♠K 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 6-Angione-Lane
50 3.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♠5 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
50 3.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♣9 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
50 3.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♣7 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
100 1.00 5.00 4♥ S -2 ♣Q 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
600 0.00 6.00 5♥** S -2 ♠5 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
|
| 12 |
♠KJ97
♥T632
♦9743
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣0 ♦3 ♥0 ♠6 NT0 |
| EW: 6♣ 3♦ 6♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 6.00 0.00 3N E 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
420 5.00 1.00 5♣ E +1 ♠A 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 7-Rogers-Hale
460 2.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♠3 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 6-Angione-Lane
460 2.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♠3 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
460 2.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♠3 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
460 2.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♣7 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
480 0.00 6.00 4♥ W +2 ♣4 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
|
| 13 |
♠QT76
♥5
♦J65
♣K6542
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦0 ♥0 NT0 |
| EW: 7♦ 7♥ 7NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 7♥ W -2 ♥5 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 6-Angione-Lane
640 5.00 1.00 5♦ E +2 ♣J 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
710 4.00 2.00 4♥ W +3 ♣4 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
1390 2.50 3.50 6♦ E +1 ♠5 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
1390 2.50 3.50 6♦ E +1 ♠4 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
1460 1.00 5.00 6♥ W +1 ♣4 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 7-Rogers-Hale
2220 0.00 6.00 7N W ♣4 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
|
| 14 |
♠85
♥Q752
♦Q98
♣7632
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠4 |
| EW: 2/1♦ 3/2♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 2.00 2N S -1 ♠4 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
50 4.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♠3 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
50 4.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♦A 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
50 4.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♣4 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 6-Angione-Lane
50 4.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 ♣A 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
90 1.00 5.00 1N E ♥6 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
140 0.00 6.00 2♠ E +1 ♣5 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 7-Rogers-Hale
|
| 15 |
♠T762
♥AQ43
♦J543
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠5 |
| EW: 1/2♥ ♣5 ♦2/3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.50 0.50 3♦ S ♠A 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 6-Angione-Lane
110 5.50 0.50 2♦ S +1 ♠A 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
100 3.50 2.50 2♠ E -2 ♥T 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
100 3.50 2.50 2♠* E -1 ♥T 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
100 2.00 4.00 4♦ S -1 ♠A 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
110 1.00 5.00 2♠ E ♠3 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
140 0.00 6.00 3♥ E ♦K 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 7-Rogers-Hale
|
| 16 |
♠AK75
♥Q86
♦J842
♣84
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 4♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.50 0.50 4♥ S ♦A 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
420 5.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣Q 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 7-Rogers-Hale
170 4.00 2.00 2♥ S +2 ♥3 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
140 2.50 3.50 3♠ S ♣Q 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
140 2.50 3.50 3♥ S ♣Q 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
50 1.00 5.00 4♠ S -1 ♣Q 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 6-Angione-Lane
100 0.00 6.00 5♥ S -2 ♥7 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
|
| 17 |
♠A42
♥AKT973
♦98
♣KT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 ♦7 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
140 5.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♦3 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
110 3.00 3.00 2♠ S ♦3 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
110 3.00 3.00 2♥ N ♦7 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 6-Angione-Lane
110 3.00 3.00 2♥ N ♦7 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
50 0.50 5.50 4♠ S -1 ♦5 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 7-Rogers-Hale
50 0.50 5.50 4♥ N -1 ♦7 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
|
| 18 |
♠5
♥QT843
♦J753
♣952
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♦ 4/3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 6.00 0.00 4♠ E +2 ♦2 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
980 4.00 2.00 6♠ E ♥2 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
980 4.00 2.00 6♠ E ♣K 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 7-Rogers-Hale
980 4.00 2.00 6♠ E ♣K 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
990 2.00 4.00 6N E ♣K 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
1010 0.50 5.50 6♠ E +1 ♦Q 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 6-Angione-Lane
1010 0.50 5.50 6♠ E +1 ♦2 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
|
| 19 |
♠J6543
♥Q65
♦98
♣T32
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦1 ♥4/5 NT5 |
| EW: 4♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♣A 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
200 5.50 0.50 5♦ W -2 ♣T 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
100 4.00 2.00 4♣ S -2 ♦A 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
130 1.50 4.50 3♦ W +1 ♣T 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
130 1.50 4.50 3♦ W +1 ♣2 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 6-Angione-Lane
130 1.50 4.50 2♦ W +2 ♣T 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 7-Rogers-Hale
130 1.50 4.50 2♦ W +2 ♣2 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 20 |
♠K52
♥AQT54
♦9642
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 6♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥1 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 6.00 0.00 4♥ N +3 ♥2 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
680 4.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 ♦T 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
680 4.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 ♣Q 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
650 3.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 ♣K 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
230 1.50 4.50 3♥ N +3 ♠6 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 6-Angione-Lane
230 1.50 4.50 2♥ N +4 ♠8 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 7-Rogers-Hale
100 0.00 6.00 4♥ N -1 ♠8 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
|
| 21 |
♠Q98
♥T3
♦Q97
♣KJ643
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♥ 3♠ 3/1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♦Q 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
140 5.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 ♠7 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
140 5.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 ♣8 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
200 1.50 4.50 3♥ E +2 ♦T 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
200 1.50 4.50 2♥ W +3 ♦7 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 7-Rogers-Hale
200 1.50 4.50 2♥ E +3 ♥A 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
200 1.50 4.50 2♥ E +3 ♦A 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 6-Angione-Lane
|
| 22 |
♠T8
♥QJT3
♦A9754
♣76
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♠2 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
170 4.50 1.50 3♥ E +1 ♦3 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
170 4.50 1.50 2♥ E +2 ♠Q 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 7-Rogers-Hale
200 3.00 3.00 2♥ E +3 ♠2 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
620 1.00 5.00 4♥ W ♠T 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 6-Angione-Lane
620 1.00 5.00 4♥ E ♠Q 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
620 1.00 5.00 4♥ E ♦3 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 23 |
♠QJ94
♥83
♦T84
♣9876
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦3/4 ♥3/2 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 6♥ E -1 ♦A 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
620 5.00 1.00 4♥ E ♦A 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 6-Angione-Lane
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♠6 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♠6 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦A 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 7-Rogers-Hale
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦A 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦A 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
|
| 24 |
♠T86432
♥64
♦J52
♣K2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
210 6.00 0.00 1N W +4 ♥6 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
400 5.00 1.00 3N E ♦7 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
430 4.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♥5 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
460 2.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♥6 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 6-Angione-Lane
460 2.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♠7 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 7-Rogers-Hale
460 2.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♦7 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
490 0.00 6.00 3N E +3 ♦7 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
|
| 25 |
♠AT83
♥K932
♦T872
♣6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 2♥ S ♦4 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
100 5.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 ♦Q 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
80 4.00 2.00 1♥ N ♦A 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
100 3.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 ♦A 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 7-Rogers-Hale
110 2.00 4.00 3♣ E ♥6 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 6-Angione-Lane
150 0.50 5.50 1N E +2 ♥6 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
150 0.50 5.50 3♣ E +2 ♦3 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 26 |
♠QJ952
♥98
♦AK7
♣Q75
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 6.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠6 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
140 5.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♠6 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
100 2.50 3.50 3N N -1 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 6-Angione-Lane
100 2.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♠A 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
100 2.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♣9 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
100 2.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♣8 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 7-Rogers-Hale
300 0.00 6.00 3N N -3 ♣7 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
|
| 27 |
♠KJ9
♥AK75
♦842
♣963
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 1/2♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 2♥ S ♣Q 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
PASS 5.00 1.00 Pass Out 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
50 4.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♠4 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
140 2.00 4.00 3♠ W ♦2 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 7-Rogers-Hale
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♥A 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 6-Angione-Lane
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♦8 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
570 0.00 6.00 2♠* W +1 ♥A 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
|
| 28 |
♠4
♥KJT9763
♦43
♣J94
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♥ 1NT ♣2 ♦2 ♠3 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♠ ♥2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 6.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♣A 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
100 4.50 1.50 6♦ E -2 ♥A 3-Lagodimos-Buswell vs 6-Angione-Lane
100 4.50 1.50 6♦* E -1 ♣2 5-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
50 3.00 3.00 6♣ E -1 ♠A 7-Vannoy-Shaffer vs 7-Rogers-Hale
400 2.00 4.00 5♣ E ♥A 6-Rankin-Rafenstein vs 5-Bloomberg-Wetz
550 0.50 5.50 5♦* E ♠A 1-Stebbins-Neel vs 2-Block-Schneidewind
550 0.50 5.50 5♦* E ♣2 2-Dodson-Mackey vs 4-Chaganlal-Syversen
|