Hands and Results
| 1 |
♠A7
♥JT4
♦JT7432
♣T3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♣5 1-Cogdill-Cherry vs 6-Collins-Bloch
120 3.00 1.00 2N W ♦4 5-Crail-Beinfest vs 9-Wilson-Lewis
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♣5 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Henning-Perdue
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ E ♣6 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos vs 2-McPhillips-Patchin
460 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♦7 3-Chene-Hurley vs 10-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 2 |
♠AJ873
♥K65
♦A75
♣T3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 1♠ ♣6/7 ♦4 ♥3 NT3/4 |
| EW: 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♠4 3-Chene-Hurley vs 10-Hunter-Hunter
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♦6 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Henning-Perdue
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ E ♣7 5-Crail-Beinfest vs 9-Wilson-Lewis
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ E 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos vs 2-McPhillips-Patchin
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +1 ♠4 1-Cogdill-Cherry vs 6-Collins-Bloch
|
| 3 |
♠T95
♥74
♦AQJT7
♣Q65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣0 ♦5 ♥1 ♠0 NT0 |
| EW: 5/6♣ 1♦ 4/5♥ 5/6♠ 2/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ E ♣J 1-Cogdill-Cherry vs 6-Collins-Bloch
660 3.00 1.00 3N W +2 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos vs 2-McPhillips-Patchin
690 1.50 2.50 3N W +3 ♦A 3-Chene-Hurley vs 10-Hunter-Hunter
690 1.50 2.50 3N W +3 ♦Q 5-Crail-Beinfest vs 9-Wilson-Lewis
720 0.00 4.00 3N W +4 ♦Q 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 7-Henning-Perdue
|
| 4 |
♠KJ6
♥Q52
♦AQT6
♣K42
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3/4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N N ♦4 2-McPhillips-Patchin vs 7-Henning-Perdue
90 3.00 1.00 1N N ♠3 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Collins-Bloch
100 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♦4 9-Wilson-Lewis vs 3-Chene-Hurley
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♠3 5-Crail-Beinfest vs 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos
300 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 ♠5 1-Cogdill-Cherry vs 10-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 5 |
♠AJ532
♥T
♦Q876
♣T42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♥ 1/-♠ 2NT ♦4 ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -3 ♣2 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Collins-Bloch
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 ♥A 2-McPhillips-Patchin vs 7-Henning-Perdue
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 9-Wilson-Lewis vs 3-Chene-Hurley
100 1.00 3.00 2♦ S -1 ♥K 1-Cogdill-Cherry vs 10-Hunter-Hunter
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ W +1 ♦6 5-Crail-Beinfest vs 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos
|
| 6 |
♠T54
♥T732
♦87
♣Q653
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 2♠ 2/1NT ♣5 ♦3 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♦ ♥6/5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ S ♣A 2-McPhillips-Patchin vs 7-Henning-Perdue
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ S -1 ♣A 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 6-Collins-Bloch
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -2 ♣A 9-Wilson-Lewis vs 3-Chene-Hurley
100 1.50 2.50 3♠ S -2 ♣K 1-Cogdill-Cherry vs 10-Hunter-Hunter
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ E +2 ♠A 5-Crail-Beinfest vs 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos
|
| 7 |
♠K32
♥A963
♦QJ2
♣J73
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♦4 1-Cogdill-Cherry vs 9-Wilson-Lewis
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♠4 10-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♠4 2-McPhillips-Patchin vs 6-Collins-Bloch
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 3-Chene-Hurley vs 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♦5 5-Crail-Beinfest vs 7-Henning-Perdue
|
| 8 |
♠-
♥QJ87
♦Q63
♣KJ8653
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 4♦ 5♠ 3NT ♣3 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ W ♥Q 2-McPhillips-Patchin vs 6-Collins-Bloch
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ W ♥7 5-Crail-Beinfest vs 7-Henning-Perdue
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ W ♣6 10-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♣5 1-Cogdill-Cherry vs 9-Wilson-Lewis
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 3-Chene-Hurley vs 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos
|
| 9 |
♠Q52
♥AKQ9
♦852
♣J86
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
530 4.00 0.00 3♥* N 3-Chene-Hurley vs 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ S ♦A 2-McPhillips-Patchin vs 6-Collins-Bloch
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ N ♠4 10-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Palmer-Palmer
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠4 1-Cogdill-Cherry vs 9-Wilson-Lewis
90 0.00 4.00 1♦ W +1 ♥A 5-Crail-Beinfest vs 7-Henning-Perdue
|
| 10 |
♠QJ432
♥K976
♦T4
♣J4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1/-NT ♦5 ♠4 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 3♣ E ♥5 3-Chene-Hurley vs 7-Henning-Perdue
110 3.50 0.50 2♣ E +1 ♥2 2-McPhillips-Patchin vs 10-Hunter-Hunter
130 2.00 2.00 2♣ E +2 ♥5 6-Collins-Bloch vs 5-Crail-Beinfest
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +2 ♦5 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 9-Wilson-Lewis
600 0.00 4.00 3N W ♥6 1-Cogdill-Cherry vs 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos
|
| 11 |
♠4
♥Q52
♦T953
♣T9742
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠1 NT6 |
| EW: 1♦ 4♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 1♥ W +1 ♣T 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 9-Wilson-Lewis
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♠4 6-Collins-Bloch vs 5-Crail-Beinfest
170 2.00 2.00 1♥ W +3 ♣9 3-Chene-Hurley vs 7-Henning-Perdue
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W ♠4 1-Cogdill-Cherry vs 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos
460 0.00 4.00 4N W +1 ♥2 2-McPhillips-Patchin vs 10-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 12 |
♠62
♥QJT863
♦J82
♣AJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 ♦A 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 9-Wilson-Lewis
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 ♠J 3-Chene-Hurley vs 7-Henning-Perdue
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♦A 6-Collins-Bloch vs 5-Crail-Beinfest
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 ♣Q 1-Cogdill-Cherry vs 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♦A 2-McPhillips-Patchin vs 10-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 13 |
♠AQ8
♥K86532
♦K3
♣Q4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♥ 5♠ 6NT ♦5 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣3/2 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 7-Henning-Perdue vs 1-Cogdill-Cherry
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♣7 3-Chene-Hurley vs 6-Collins-Bloch
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♠7 5-Crail-Beinfest vs 10-Hunter-Hunter
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ N ♦6 2-McPhillips-Patchin vs 9-Wilson-Lewis
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ S ♠2 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos
|
| 14 |
♠KT6
♥Q986
♦JT9
♣832
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♣ W -1 ♥6 5-Crail-Beinfest vs 10-Hunter-Hunter
110 3.00 1.00 2♣ W +1 ♥6 7-Henning-Perdue vs 1-Cogdill-Cherry
130 1.50 2.50 3♣ W +1 ♠6 2-McPhillips-Patchin vs 9-Wilson-Lewis
130 1.50 2.50 2♣ W +2 ♠6 3-Chene-Hurley vs 6-Collins-Bloch
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♠4 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos
|
| 15 |
♠KQ
♥AKJ9
♦KJ53
♣J72
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ 1/-NT ♣6 ♥5/6 NT7/6 |
EW: -/1♣ 1♥ ♣6/7 ♦5/6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥3 3-Chene-Hurley vs 6-Collins-Bloch
90 2.50 1.50 1N N ♥3 7-Henning-Perdue vs 1-Cogdill-Cherry
90 2.50 1.50 1♦ N +1 ♥2 2-McPhillips-Patchin vs 9-Wilson-Lewis
100 0.50 3.50 2N N -1 ♥5 4-Palmer-Palmer vs 8-Dusharme-Lagodimos
100 0.50 3.50 2N N -1 ♥3 5-Crail-Beinfest vs 10-Hunter-Hunter
|