Hands and Results
| 1 |
♠762
♥JT972
♦T732
♣T
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♦ 6♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 3/2♣ 3♠ ♦1 ♥0 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 5♦* S +1 ♠K 4-Crail-Huffman vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
420 0.50 1.50 5♦ S +1 ♠K 5-Rankin-Lagodimos vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
420 0.50 1.50 5♦ S +1 ♠K 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Dusharme-Dusharme
|
| 2 |
♠6
♥T94
♦KQ96432
♣72
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥1/0 ♠1/0 NT1/0 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 6♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 6♥ E -3 ♣K 5-Rankin-Lagodimos vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
480 1.00 1.00 4♠ W +2 ♦K 4-Crail-Huffman vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
980 0.00 2.00 6♠ W ♦K 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Dusharme-Dusharme
|
| 3 |
♠K6432
♥QJ82
♦J9
♣Q5
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦4/5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ N ♠Q 5-Rankin-Lagodimos vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
50 1.00 1.00 3N S -1 ♦3 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Dusharme-Dusharme
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♠Q 4-Crail-Huffman vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
|
| 4 |
♠Q864
♥T
♦86
♣JT9764
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1/-♠ 1NT
♣4/3 ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ N ♠2 5-Rankin-Lagodimos vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
120 1.00 1.00 2N E ♠T 4-Crail-Huffman vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ E ♣K 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Dusharme-Dusharme
|
| 5 |
♠Q8
♥QT94
♦T854
♣KT6
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1/-NT
♣5/4 ♦5/4 ♠6 NT7/6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 ♣A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
50 1.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♥T 1-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Rankin-Lagodimos
50 1.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 ♣6 4-Crail-Huffman vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 6 |
♠T5
♥A85
♦A93
♣KJT53
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 1♥ S +3 ♠K 4-Crail-Huffman vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
130 1.00 1.00 3♣ N +1 ♠A 1-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Rankin-Lagodimos
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 ♣K 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
|
| 7 |
♠KQ97
♥6
♦JT752
♣AK8
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♥9 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
650 1.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♦K 1-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Rankin-Lagodimos
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ N ♦K 4-Crail-Huffman vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 8 |
♠KT854
♥KQ3
♦K8
♣J97
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥7 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ S ♣5 1-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 5-Rankin-Lagodimos
50 0.00 2.00 1♠ N -1 ♥J 4-Crail-Huffman vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 9 |
♠J6
♥J7542
♦Q98
♣Q96
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.00 0.00 1N S +3 ♣4 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
170 0.50 1.50 3♥ S +1 ♦7 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 1-Dusharme-Dusharme
170 0.50 1.50 2♥ S +2 ♦3 5-Rankin-Lagodimos vs 4-Crail-Huffman
|
| 10 |
♠AK3
♥QJ7
♦J63
♣QT92
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2♠ ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♣ W -1 ♠A 5-Rankin-Lagodimos vs 4-Crail-Huffman
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ W +2 ♥7 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 1-Dusharme-Dusharme
|
| 11 |
♠QJT
♥-
♦QJ732
♣JT987
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 5♣ S ♥3 5-Rankin-Lagodimos vs 4-Crail-Huffman
150 1.00 1.00 4♥ E -3 ♠A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
120 0.00 2.00 2N S ♥4 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 1-Dusharme-Dusharme
|
| 12 |
♠Q8
♥AQ95
♦AQT7
♣763
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♦ 6♥ 3♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 1.00 1.00 6♥ S ♠A 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 1-Dusharme-Dusharme
1430 1.00 1.00 6♥ S ♠A 5-Rankin-Lagodimos vs 4-Crail-Huffman
1430 1.00 1.00 6♥ S 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 13 |
♠K9
♥J8
♦KJ8765
♣865
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 1/-♥ 3♠ ♣1 ♦6 ♥7/6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 5♣ S ♥4 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Crail-Huffman
150 1.00 1.00 4♣ S +1 ♥T 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Dusharme-Dusharme
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 5-Rankin-Lagodimos
|
| 14 |
♠K54
♥Q75
♦A9642
♣K6
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ -/1NT
♥5 ♠6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 1N W +2 ♦4 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 5-Rankin-Lagodimos
150 1.50 0.50 1N W +2 ♦4 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Dusharme-Dusharme
180 0.00 2.00 1N W +3 ♦2 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Crail-Huffman
|
| 15 |
♠AK5
♥T76
♦A9532
♣J8
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ -/1NT
♣6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N N ♣3 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Crail-Huffman
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Dusharme-Dusharme
200 0.00 2.00 2N N -2 ♦4 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 5-Rankin-Lagodimos
|
| 16 |
♠KJ4
♥AQ8
♦8
♣AJ9653
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 3/4♥ 4♠ 1/4NT ♣6 ♦5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♣T 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Crail-Huffman
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ W ♦8 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Dusharme-Dusharme
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 2-Parikh-Parikh vs 5-Rankin-Lagodimos
|
| 17 |
♠AK74
♥K8
♦AJ963
♣A2
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♦ 1/2♠
♣3/4 ♥3/4 NT4/5 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠2 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♦8 1-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Crail-Huffman
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ E +2 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Lagodimos
|
| 18 |
♠KT
♥KJT92
♦-
♣KQJT52
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 2NT ♠5 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣1/2 ♦6 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 5♣ N ♥A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Lagodimos
200 1.00 1.00 3♥ N +2 ♣4 1-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Crail-Huffman
150 0.00 2.00 4♣ N +1 ♠A 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
|
| 19 |
♠A5
♥T865
♦A5
♣KJ953
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/4♣ 4♥ 2NT ♦2 ♠5 |
| EW: 4/5♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ S ♠4 1-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Crail-Huffman
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ S ♦Q 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Parikh-Parikh
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ S ♣A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Lagodimos
|
| 20 |
♠A7
♥A98
♦AKT
♣A9543
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1/2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 1.75 0.25 2N N +2 ♥4 1-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Crail-Huffman
90 0.25 1.75 2♣ N 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Lagodimos
|