
To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session March 26, 2014
Scores after 7 rounds Average: 31.5 Section E
Pair Pct Score Section Rank Overall Rank MPs
A B C A B C
5 61.90 39.00 A 1 1 1.52(OA) John Peter Lagodimos - John Dusharme
4 57.94 36.50 B 2/3 1/2 2/3 1/2 1.00(OA) Rose Vogt - Thomas Turner
7 57.94 36.50 B 2/3 1/2 2/3 1/2 1.00(OA) Judi Bunch - Hiroko Kitamura
1 48.41 30.50 B Thomas Ciolli - James Ciolli
2 47.62 30.00 C 1 0.18(SC) Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter
8 46.03 29.00 A Kathie Angione - Vickie Palmer
3 42.86 27.00 C Pat Woodford - Cheryl Rankin
6 37.30 23.50 C Roy Shepard - Dave Cleary
NS 3♠; NS 2♥; EW 3♣; EW 1N; EW 2♦; Par +100: EW 4♣×−1 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ S ♠ 5 −1 50 2.00 1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Vogt-Turner
4 ♠ N ♣ K −1 50 2.00 1.00 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 6-Shepard-Cleary
4 ♥ S ♦ 10 −1 50 2.00 1.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
4 ♥ S ♠ 5 −2 100 0.00 3.00 3-Woodford-Rankin vs 7-Bunch-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
W 4♥; E 2♥; NS 3♦; EW 1N; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; Par −420 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♦ 2 −1 50 2.50 0.50 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 6-Shepard-Cleary
4 ♥ W ♠ 7 −1 50 2.50 0.50 8-Angione-Palmer vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
4 ♥ W ♣ A 4 420 1.00 2.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Vogt-Turner
4 ♥ W ♠ J 5 450 0.00 3.00 3-Woodford-Rankin vs 7-Bunch-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♥; EW 2N; EW 3♦; NS 2♣; Par −140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ E ♠ 7 −1 100 3.00 0.00 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 6-Shepard-Cleary
2 ♥ W 3 140 2.00 1.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 ♦ E ♣ J 5 150 1.00 2.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Vogt-Turner
4 ♥ W ♣ 8 5 650 0.00 3.00 3-Woodford-Rankin vs 7-Bunch-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♥; NS 4♦; NS 2N; EW 2♣; Par +140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ S ♣ 2 4 170 3.00 0.00 4-Vogt-Turner vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 ♦ N ♣ A 5 150 2.00 1.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♦ N ♣ A 3 110 1.00 2.00 6-Shepard-Cleary vs 7-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♣ E ♦ 4 −1 100 0.00 3.00 3-Woodford-Rankin vs 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3N; NS 3♠; EW 4♦; EW 2♥; Par −130 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠× S ♦ J 4 790 3.00 0.00 3-Woodford-Rankin vs 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme
3 ♠× S ♦ 5 3 730 2.00 1.00 4-Vogt-Turner vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
4 ♦ E ♥ 8 −1 50 1.00 2.00 6-Shepard-Cleary vs 7-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♦× E ♠ K 4 510 0.00 3.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 7N; EW 7♥; EW 7♦; EW 6♠; EW 2♣; Par −2220 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ W ♣ Q 6 680 3.00 0.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
6 ♠ E ♣ 5 6 1430 2.00 1.00 6-Shepard-Cleary vs 7-Bunch-Kitamura
6 NT E ♣ 3 7 1470 0.50 2.50 3-Woodford-Rankin vs 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme
6 NT E ♣ 5 7 1470 0.50 2.50 4-Vogt-Turner vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3N; EW 3♠; EW 3♥; EW 2♦; EW 2♣; Par −600 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♣ 6 −1 100 2.50 0.50 4-Vogt-Turner vs 6-Shepard-Cleary
4 ♥ W ♦ 6 −1 100 2.50 0.50 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠ W ♦ 6 5 200 1.00 2.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 3-Woodford-Rankin
3 NT W ♣ 6 3 600 0.00 3.00 7-Bunch-Kitamura vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 6♦; NS 4N; NS 3♠; N 3♥; NS 4♣; S 2♥; Par +920 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♥ 6 5 460 2.50 0.50 4-Vogt-Turner vs 6-Shepard-Cleary
3 NT N ♥ 6 5 460 2.50 0.50 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT N ♥ 5 3 400 0.50 2.50 7-Bunch-Kitamura vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 NT N ♥ 6 3 400 0.50 2.50 8-Angione-Palmer vs 3-Woodford-Rankin
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♠; NS 2N; NS 2♥; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +420 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ S ♦ 10 4 420 2.50 0.50 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ S ♦ 10 4 420 2.50 0.50 8-Angione-Palmer vs 3-Woodford-Rankin
2 ♠ S ♦ 4 4 170 0.50 2.50 4-Vogt-Turner vs 6-Shepard-Cleary
3 ♠ S ♦ 4 4 170 0.50 2.50 7-Bunch-Kitamura vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♣; NS 3♥; EW 4♦; EW 1N; EW 1♠; Par −500: NS 5♥×−2 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♣ W ♥ K −1 100 2.50 0.50 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 7-Bunch-Kitamura
5 ♦ E ♥ A −1 100 2.50 0.50 6-Shepard-Cleary vs 3-Woodford-Rankin
4 ♥ N ♠ Q −1 100 1.00 2.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 4-Vogt-Turner
3 ♣ W ♥ K 5 150 0.00 3.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3N; EW 3♥; EW 4♦; NS 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −400 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♠ 5 4 420 2.00 1.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ W ♠ 5 4 420 2.00 1.00 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 7-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♥ W ♠ Q 4 420 2.00 1.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 4-Vogt-Turner
4 ♥ W ♠ 5 5 450 0.00 3.00 6-Shepard-Cleary vs 3-Woodford-Rankin
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 4N; EW 3♥; EW 4♦; EW 4♣; EW 2♠; Par −430 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♠ 8 −1 50 3.00 0.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♣ W ♠ 9 3 110 2.00 1.00 6-Shepard-Cleary vs 3-Woodford-Rankin
3 NT W ♦ 4 3 400 0.50 2.50 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme vs 7-Bunch-Kitamura
3 NT E ♠ 10 3 400 0.50 2.50 8-Angione-Palmer vs 4-Vogt-Turner
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 2N; EW 2♥; EW 3♣; EW 2♦; Par −140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♣ E ♦ 6 3 110 2.00 1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Woodford-Rankin
3 ♣ E ♣ 6 3 110 2.00 1.00 7-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Vogt-Turner
2 ♠ E ♦ 6 2 110 2.00 1.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme
1 NT E ♣ 6 4 180 0.00 3.00 6-Shepard-Cleary vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♥; NS 2N; NS 3♦; E 2♣; EW 1♠; W 1♣; Par +420 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ E ♣ 3 −4 200 3.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Woodford-Rankin
5 ♦ E ♦ A −3 150 2.00 1.00 6-Shepard-Cleary vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 ♠ E ♣ 3 −1 50 1.00 2.00 7-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Vogt-Turner
3 ♠× E ♦ A 3 530 0.00 3.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 4N; EW 4♦; NS 2♥; EW 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −430 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♦ W ♣ Q −2 100 3.00 0.00 7-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Vogt-Turner
3 NT E ♣ 2 4 430 2.00 1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Woodford-Rankin
3 NT E ♣ 3 5 460 0.50 2.50 6-Shepard-Cleary vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 NT E ♣ 5 5 460 0.50 2.50 8-Angione-Palmer vs 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; S 2N; NS 3♦; EW 3♣; N 1N; EW 1♥; Par −100: S 3N×−1; NS 4♦×−1 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♦ N ♠ 3 −2 100 3.00 0.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 6-Shepard-Cleary
2 ♠ W ♦ 3 3 140 2.00 1.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme
5 ♦× N ♥ 3 −3 500 1.00 2.00 7-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ W ♦ J 4 620 0.00 3.00 3-Woodford-Rankin vs 4-Vogt-Turner
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N 4N; NS 4♠; S 3N; NS 3♥; NS 4♦; NS 1♣; Par +430 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S ♣ 2 5 460 3.00 0.00 3-Woodford-Rankin vs 4-Vogt-Turner
2 ♠ N ♠ 2 4 170 2.00 1.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme
2 NT S ♣ 2 2 120 1.00 2.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 6-Shepard-Cleary
3 NT S ♣ 2 −1 50 0.00 3.00 7-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 5N; NS 5♦; NS 5♣; Par +660 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♥ 2 6 690 2.00 1.00 3-Woodford-Rankin vs 4-Vogt-Turner
3 NT S ♠ 3 6 690 2.00 1.00 7-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT N ♠ 3 6 690 2.00 1.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 6-Shepard-Cleary
2 ♣ N ♦ J 5 150 0.00 3.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♠; EW 3♥; NS 1N; N 2♦; NS 2♣; Par +140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠× N ♦ A 3 530 3.00 0.00 4-Vogt-Turner vs 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme
2 ♠ S ♥ K 3 140 2.00 1.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 7-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♠ N ♦ A −1 50 1.00 2.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Shepard-Cleary
4 ♠ S ♦ 10 −2 100 0.00 3.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Woodford-Rankin
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N 5♠; S 4♠; NS 4♥; NS 3♣; EW 1♦; Par +650 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT× S ♣ 6 4 950 3.00 0.00 4-Vogt-Turner vs 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme
3 NT N ♦ K −3 300 1.50 1.50 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Woodford-Rankin
3 NT N ♦ A −3 300 1.50 1.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Shepard-Cleary
3 NT N ♦ K −4 400 0.00 3.00 8-Angione-Palmer vs 7-Bunch-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 7♦; EW 6N; E 5♥; EW 4♠; W 4♥; EW 3♣; Par −1440 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♥ 4 6 490 3.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Shepard-Cleary
6 ♦ W ♣ Q 6 920 2.00 1.00 4-Vogt-Turner vs 5-Lagodimos-Dusharme
6 ♦ W ♥ 3 7 940 0.50 2.50 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Woodford-Rankin
6 ♦ W 7 940 0.50 2.50 8-Angione-Palmer vs 7-Bunch-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||